Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re JBgreen2 sentences2004Id. at 561; In re J.B. , 93 S.W.3d 609, 629-31 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. denied) (explaining why Nenno framework should be used to evaluate “soft science” testimony in civil cases pending guidance from the supreme court); see also In re G.B. , No. 07-01-0210-CV, 2003 WL 22327191 , *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Oct. 10, 2003, no pet.) (memo op.) (applying Nenno to a parental termination case). 2004Id. at 561; In re J.B., 93 S.W.3d 609, 629-31 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, pet. denied) (explaining why Nenno framework should be used to evaluate “soft science” testimony in civil cases pending guidance from the supreme court); see also In re G.B., No. 07-01-0210-CV, 2003 WL 22327191 , *2 (TexApp.-Amarillo Oct.10, 2003, no pet.) (memo op.) (applying Nenno to a parental termination ease). | 3 | 3 |
Nenno v. Statered2 sentences2002Later, in Nenno , the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals gave us a framework by which to test the reliability of "fields of study aside from the hard sciences, such as social sciences or fields that are based primarily upon experience and training as opposed to the scientific method." Nenno v. State, 970 S.W.2d 549, 561 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). 2002Later, in Nenno, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals gave us a framework by which to test the reliability of “fields of study aside from the hard sciences, such as social sciences or fields that are based primarily upon experience and training as opposed to the scientific method.” Nenno v. State, 970 S.W.2d 549, 561 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). | 2 | 2 |
J.R.W. v. Stategreen1 sentence1994See J.R.W. v. State, 879 S.W.2d 254, 256-57 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994, n.w.h.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2002Specifically, Maysonet contends that “[wjhatever the officer’s suspicions may have been, the far reaching questions he asked [Maysonet] went well beyond any level of inquiry reasonably related to a stop for speeding.” Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), provides the framework for our inquiry into this traffic stop. 2002Specifically, Maysonet contends that “[wjhatever the officer’s suspicions may have been, the far reaching questions he asked [Maysonet] went well beyond any level of inquiry reasonably related to a stop for speeding.” Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), provides the framework for our inquiry into this traffic stop. | 5 | 2001–2002 |
Snyder Communications v. Magana
green
2 sentences2004Federal appellate courts have held that "the term 'rigorous analysis' does not mean that a reviewing court must apply a less deferential standard of review than abuse of discretion, but rather that the trial court must exercise its discretion within the framework of the rule." Snyder , 94 S.W.3d at 224 ; see Fed. 2004Federal appellate courts have held that “the term ‘rigorous analysis’ does not mean that a reviewing court must apply a less deferential standard of review than abuse of discretion, but rather that the trial court must exercise its discretion within the framework of the rule.” Snyder, 94 S.W.3d at 224 ; see Fed.R.Civ.P. 23; Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89, 100 , 101 S.Ct. 2193 , 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981). | 3 | 2001–2004 |
Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard
green
2 sentences2004Federal appellate courts have held that “the term ‘rigorous analysis’ does not mean that a reviewing court must apply a less deferential standard of review than abuse of discretion, but rather that the trial court must exercise its discretion within the framework of the rule.” Snyder, 94 S.W.3d at 224 ; see Fed.R.Civ.P. 23; Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89, 100 , 101 S.Ct. 2193 , 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981). 2004Federal appellate courts have held that “the term ‘rigorous analysis’ does not mean that a reviewing court must apply a less deferential standard of review than abuse of discretion, but rather that the trial court must exercise its discretion within the framework of the rule.” Snyder, 94 S.W.3d at 224 ; see Fed.R.Civ.P. 23; Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89, 100 , 101 S.Ct. 2193 , 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981). | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Marin v. State
green
1 sentence2025On discretionary review the Court of Criminal Appeals analyzed whether a trial objection was required based on where Article 38.05 fit in the framework for error preservation described in Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Barajas v. State
green
1 sentence2019“The question ‘can you be fair and impartial under a given set of facts?’ can be repeated to include every fact in a given case.” Id. at 41 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2016In Jackson , Jackson killed his brother following a fight. 160 S.W.3d at 569-70 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013U.S. Supreme Court trio: Morales, Wolens, Rowe In Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., the Supreme Court construed the ADA’s preemption provision as having a broad scope. 504 U.S. at 383 , 112 S.Ct. at 2037 . 2013U.S. Supreme Court trio: Morales, Wolens, Rowe In Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., the Supreme Court construed the ADA’s preemption provision as having a broad scope. 504 U.S. at 383 , 112 S.Ct. at 2037 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Mussemann v. Villarreal Ex Rel. Elizondo
green
1 sentence2009We did likewise in Mussemann . 178 S.W.3d at 324 . [16] Appellants = first issue addresses the framework of our analysis and does not urge a particular outcome. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Long v. State
green
1 sentence1992Long, 823 S.W.2d at 272 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Harris v. State
green
2 sentences1992We have examined the factors set out in Harris, 790 S.W.2d at 587 -88 and the framework in which the factors are to be applied. 1992We have examined the factors set out in Harris, 790 S.W.2d at 587 -88 and the framework in which the factors are to be applied. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Paprskar v. State
green
1 sentence1990Nastu, 589 S.W.2d at 440 ; Paprskar, 484 S.W.2d at 738 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Nastu v. State
green
1 sentence1990Nastu, 589 S.W.2d at 440 ; Paprskar, 484 S.W.2d at 738 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.