13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ashcroft v. Iqbalgreen2 sentences2010See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 , 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 , 173 L. 2010See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 , 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 , 173 L. | 2 | 2 |
cluster 431104green1 sentence2014Among other courts, two different approaches have emerged: The more difficult test is the “complete domination” test, under which a plaintiff who seeks to toll the statute under adverse domination must show “full, complete and exclusive control in the directors or officers charged.” Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir. [1984]) (quoting International Rys. of Cent. | 1 | 1 |
International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Companygreen1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Conley v. Gibsonred2 sentences2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per 2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per | 1 | 1 |
Christensen v. Swedish Hospitalgreen2 sentences2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per 2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per | 1 | 1 |
Halvorson v. Dahlgreen2 sentences2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per 2010See Halvorson *863 v. Dahl, 89 Wash.2d 673, 674 , 574 P.2d 1190 (1978) ("On a [CR] 12(b)(6) motion, a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations must be denied unless no state of facts which plaintiff could prove, consistent with the complaint, would entitle the plaintiff to relief on the claim."); see also Christensen v. Swedish Hosp., 59 Wash.2d 545, 548 , 368 P.2d 897 (1962) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). ¶ 8 However the United States Supreme Court has recently revised its dismissal standard under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), per | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Noltie
green
2 sentences2021When it comes to assessing a trial court’s decision on a challenge for cause, we must keep in mind that the trial court has the advantage of observing a juror’s demeanor and is therefore “in the best position to determine a juror’s ability to be fair and impartial.” Id. at 839 . 2021When it comes to assessing a trial court’s decision on a challenge for cause, we must keep in mind that the trial court has the advantage of observing a juror’s demeanor and is therefore “in the best position to determine a juror’s ability to be fair and impartial.” Id. at 839 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB
green
2 sentences2013FSB. 169 Wn.2d 96, 101 , 233 P.3d 861 (2010). 76 In McCurrv. our Supreme Court declined to adopt the federal standard for dismissal. 2013P. 12(b)(6) permits dismissal “unless the claim is plausibly based upon the factual allegations in the complaint — a more difficult standard to satisfy.” McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, 169 Wn.2d 96, 101 , 233 P.3d 861 (2010). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB
green
2 sentences2013FSB. 169 Wn.2d 96, 101 , 233 P.3d 861 (2010). 76 In McCurrv. our Supreme Court declined to adopt the federal standard for dismissal. 2013P. 12(b)(6) permits dismissal “unless the claim is plausibly based upon the factual allegations in the complaint — a more difficult standard to satisfy.” McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, 169 Wn.2d 96, 101 , 233 P.3d 861 (2010). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Lord
green
2 sentences2006Lord, 117 Wash.2d at 849 , 822 P.2d 177 . 2006Lord, 117 Wn.2d at 849 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. McDowell
green
2 sentences2006This court held in State v. McDowell, 102 Wn.2d 341, 344 , 685 P.2d 595 (1984) that “Washington case law, in accord with [United States v.] Goodwin, [ 457 U.S. 368 , 102 S. Ct. 2485 , 73 L. 2006This court held in State v. McDowell, 102 Wn.2d 341, 344 , 685 P.2d 595 (1984) that “Washington case law, in accord with [United States v.] Goodwin, [ 457 U.S. 368 , 102 S. Ct. 2485 , 73 L. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. McCreven
green
1 sentence2025The court of appeals held that the instruction did not reflect the proper standard for self-defense and lessened the prosecution’s burden of proof in disproving self-defense because it raised the degree of threat of injury that the defendants must have reasonably perceived to act in self-defense, id. at 464 , a more difficult standard to meet for self- defense, and conversely an easier burden to disprove. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Beall Pipe & Tank Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
green
1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Tivey v. Rhay
green
1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Mosesian
green
1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Wolfson v. United States
green
1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Cathcart v. Matthews
green
1 sentence2014Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
United States v. Goodwin
green
2 sentences2006This court held in State v. McDowell, 102 Wn.2d 341, 344 , 685 P.2d 595 (1984) that “Washington case law, in accord with [United States v.] Goodwin, [ 457 U.S. 368 , 102 S. Ct. 2485 , 73 L. 2006This court held in State v. McDowell, 102 Wn.2d 341, 344 , 685 P.2d 595 (1984) that “Washington case law, in accord with [United States v.] Goodwin, [ 457 U.S. 368 , 102 S. Ct. 2485 , 73 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Walker v. Colorado Springs Sun, Inc.
green
2 sentences1976Although the Times malice test is a difficult test to meet, it has been met before and after Gertz, most recently in Walker v. Colorado Springs Sun, Inc., ___ Colo. ___, 538 P.2d 450 (1975). 1976Although the Times malice test is a difficult test to meet, it has been met before and after Gertz , most recently in Walker v. Colorado Springs Sun, Inc.,............Colo. ............, 538 P.2d 450 (1975). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.