12 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sunserigreen2 sentences2025“The timing of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is critical to identifying the governing legal standard.” Sunseri, 165 Idaho at 13 , 437 P.3d at 13 . 2025“The timing of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is critical to identifying the governing legal standard.” Sunseri, 165 Idaho at 13 , 437 P.3d at 13 . | 1 | 2 |
United States v. James and Mallaygreen1 sentence2015Because no position received support from a majority of the justices, Williams does not provide us a governing legal principle and this Court views the decision as limited to the unique set of facts presented in that case. 5 See e.g., *337 United States v. James, 712 F.3d 79, 95 (2nd Cir.2013); Jenkins v. United States, 75 A.3d 174, 176 (D.C.2013) (“Williams ... creates no new rule of law that we can apply in this case.”). | 1 | 1 |
Jenkins v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015Because no position received support from a majority of the justices, Williams does not provide us a governing legal principle and this Court views the decision as limited to the unique set of facts presented in that case. 5 See e.g., *337 United States v. James, 712 F.3d 79, 95 (2nd Cir.2013); Jenkins v. United States, 75 A.3d 174, 176 (D.C.2013) (“Williams ... creates no new rule of law that we can apply in this case.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Perrygreen2 sentences2012See Perry, 150 Idaho at 218 , 245 P.3d at 970 . 2012See Perry, 150 Idaho at 218 , 245 P.3d at 970 . | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.green2 sentences2006Under the FAA, an award may be vacated if it reflects the arbitrator's "manifest disregard of the law," which requires "(1) the arbitrators knew of the governing legal principle and refused to apply it or ignored it altogether, and (2) the governing law was well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable." Moore v. Omnicare, Inc., 141 Idaho 809, 819 , 118 P.3d 141, 151 (2005); 9 U.S.C. § 10 . 2006Under the FAA, an award may be vacated if it reflects the arbitrator's "manifest disregard of the law," which requires "(1) the arbitrators knew of the governing legal principle and refused to apply it or ignored it altogether, and (2) the governing law was well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable." Moore v. Omnicare, Inc., 141 Idaho 809, 819 , 118 P.3d 141, 151 (2005); 9 U.S.C. § 10 . | 1 | 1 |
DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.green2 sentences2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). 2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
H2O Envtl., Inc. v. Farm Supply Distribs., Inc.
green
2 sentences2020H2O Envtl., 164 Idaho at 300, 429 P.3d at 188 . 2019H2O Envtl., 164 Idaho at 300, 429 P.3d at 188 . | 2 | 2019–2020 |
cluster 547296
green
2 sentences2019Colafranceschi argues that the administrative judge failed to apply the governing legal standard outlined in De Long v. Hennessey , 912 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1990). 2019Colafranceschi argues that the administrative judge failed to apply the governing legal standard outlined in De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1990). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Flowers
green
2 sentences2018"The rule distinguishes between [motions to withdraw a guilty plea] made prior to and after sentencing, exacting a less rigorous measure of proof for presentence motions." State v. Flowers , 150 Idaho 568 , 571, 249 P.3d 367 , 370 (2011) (quoting Dopp , 124 Idaho at 485 , 861 P.2d at 55 ). 2018"The rule distinguishes between [motions to withdraw a guilty plea] made prior to and after sentencing, exacting a less rigorous measure of proof for presentence motions." State v. Flowers , 150 Idaho 568 , 571, 249 P.3d 367 , 370 (2011) (quoting Dopp , 124 Idaho at 485 , 861 P.2d at 55 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Dopp
green
2 sentences2018"The rule distinguishes between [motions to withdraw a guilty plea] made prior to and after sentencing, exacting a less rigorous measure of proof for presentence motions." State v. Flowers , 150 Idaho 568 , 571, 249 P.3d 367 , 370 (2011) (quoting Dopp , 124 Idaho at 485 , 861 P.2d at 55 ). 2018"The rule distinguishes between [motions to withdraw a guilty plea] made prior to and after sentencing, exacting a less rigorous measure of proof for presentence motions." State v. Flowers , 150 Idaho 568 , 571, 249 P.3d 367 , 370 (2011) (quoting Dopp , 124 Idaho at 485 , 861 P.2d at 55 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Barbee v. WMA Securities, Inc.
green
1 sentence2009Further, the only difference in the standard of review between the FAA and UAA is that an FAA award can be overturned on the basis of the arbitrator’s "manifest disregard of the law,” "which requires [that] (I) the arbitrators’ knew of the governing legal principle and refused to apply it or ignored it altogether, and (2) the governing law was well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable.” Id. (quoting 9 U.S.C. § 10 (2006)). 3 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Schwartz v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). 2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Einheber v. Public Employment Relations Board
green
2 sentences2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). 2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Osborne v. United States
green
2 sentences2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). 2005DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1049 , 118 S.Ct. 695 , 139 L.Ed.2d 639 (1998). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.