governing legal principle in Louisiana

2008Robert S. Robertson, Ltd., 05-435 at 5, 921 So.2d at 1091 ; Louisiana Physician Corp., 03-1721 at 2-3; 870 So.2d at 577, 578 ; Welch , 95-2085 at 6, 677 So.2d at 524 . [4] The arbitration agreement reads, in relevant part: It is understood that any disputes as to the medical services rendered under this contract will be determined by submission to arbitration proceedings as provided (sic) Louisiana Arbitration Law R.S. 9:4301 et seq., and not by a claim filed with the Commissioner of Insurance, or by a suit filed in court.

2006Louisiana Physician Corp., 03-1721 at 2-3; 870 So.2d at 577, 578 ; Welch , 95-2085 at 6, 677 So.2d at 524 .

1993(Citations omitted.) It appears that this theory has been previously accepted by Louisiana courts as set forth in I.D.C., Inc. v. Natchitoches Development Company, 482 So.2d 958, 960 (La.App. 3d Cir.1986), quoting Allen v. A & W Contractors, Inc., 433 So.2d 839 (La.

1991(Citations omitted.) It appears that this theory has been previously accepted by Louisiana courts as set forth in I.D.C., Inc. v. Natchitoches Development Company, 482 So.2d 958, 960 (La.

2016Favalora bases this argument on the judicially created doctrine that an arbitration award may be overturned when the arbitrator commits an error “which is obvious and capable of being readily and instantly percéived by an average person qualified to serve as an arbitrator,” thereby implying that “the arbitrator appreciates the existence of a clearly governing legal principle but decides to ignore it.” Brice, 2015-1110, p. 5, 194 So.3d at 1289 (citations omitted).