12 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1943–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nix v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2014The rationale behind the development of this doctrine is that “the interest of society in deterring unlawful police conduct and the public interest in having juries receive all probative evidence of a crime are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse, position that they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred.” Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 (1984). 2011The rationale behind the development of this doctrine is that “the interest of society in deterring unlawful police conduct and the public interest in having juries receive all probative evidence of a crime are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse, position that they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred.” Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 (1984). | 2 | 2 |
Totty v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2012As the Court observed, “[f]ew areas of American Jurisprudence have been more challenging through the years than the development of the standard of care applicable in medical malpractice cases.” Shipley, at 539, quoting Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). 2011We agree with the Court of Appeals’ observation in Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676, 679 (Tenn.Ct.App.2003), that “[f]ew areas of American Jurisprudence have been more challenging through the years than the development of the standard of care applicable in medical malpractice cases.” This Court first considered a challenge to the qualifications of a claimant’s expert under the locality rule in Searle v. Bryant, 713 S.W.2d 62 (Tenn.1986). | 1 | 2 |
American Land Co. v. Zeissgreen2 sentences1996See Hamilton v. Brown, supra, 161 U.S. [256], at 275, 16 S.Ct. [585], at 592 [ 40 L.Ed. 691 (1896) ]; American Land Co. v. Zeiss, 219 U.S. 47, 61-62, 65-66 , 31 S.Ct. 200, 206-207 , 55 L.Ed. 82 (1911). 1996See Hamilton v. Brown, supra, 161 U.S. [256], at 275, 16 S.Ct. [585], at 592 [ 40 L.Ed. 691 (1896) ]; American Land Co. v. Zeiss, 219 U.S. 47, 61-62, 65-66 , 31 S.Ct. 200, 206-207 , 55 L.Ed. 82 (1911). | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton v. Browngreen1 sentence1996See Hamilton v. Brown, supra, 161 U.S. [256], at 275, 16 S.Ct. [585], at 592 [ 40 L.Ed. 691 (1896) ]; American Land Co. v. Zeiss, 219 U.S. 47, 61-62, 65-66 , 31 S.Ct. 200, 206-207 , 55 L.Ed. 82 (1911). | 1 | 1 |
Batchelor v. Heiskell, Donelson, Bearman, Adams, Williams & Kirschgreen1 sentence1995See also Caledonia Leasing & Equipment Co. v. Armstrong, Allen, Braden, Goodman, McBride & Prewitt, 865 S.W.2d 10, 15 (Tenn.App.1992); Batchelor v. Heiskell, Donelson, Bearman, Adams, Williams & Kirsch, P.C., 828 S.W.2d 388, 393 (Tenn.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Caledonia Leasing & Equipment Co. v. Armstrong, Allen, Braden, Goodman, McBride & Prewittgreen1 sentence1995See also Caledonia Leasing & Equipment Co. v. Armstrong, Allen, Braden, Goodman, McBride & Prewitt, 865 S.W.2d 10, 15 (Tenn.App.1992); Batchelor v. Heiskell, Donelson, Bearman, Adams, Williams & Kirsch, P.C., 828 S.W.2d 388, 393 (Tenn.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowen ex rel. Doe v. Arnold
green
1 sentence2025Doe, 502 S.W.3d at 107–17 (discussing the development of the doctrine). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Deck v. Missouri
green
2 sentences2013Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. at 630-31 , 125 S.Ct. 2007 . 2013Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. at 630-31 , 125 S.Ct. 2007 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Searle v. Bryant
green
2 sentences2011We agree with the Court of Appeals’ observation in Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676, 679 (Tenn.Ct.App.2003), that “[f]ew areas of American Jurisprudence have been more challenging through the years than the development of the standard of care applicable in medical malpractice cases.” This Court first considered a challenge to the qualifications of a claimant’s expert under the locality rule in Searle v. Bryant, 713 S.W.2d 62 (Tenn.1986). 2011We agree with the Court of Appeals’ observation in Totty v. Thompson, 121 S.W.3d 676, 679 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003), that “[f]ew areas of American Jurisprudence have been more challenging through the years than the development of the standard of care applicable in medical malpractice cases.” This Court first considered a challenge to the qualifications of a claimant’s expert under the locality rule in Searle v. Bryant, 713 S.W.2d 62 (Tenn. 1986). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Sutphin v. Platt
green
1 sentence2003Historically, Tennessee followed the “strict locality rule” until it was legislatively supplanted in 1975 by Tennessee’s version of the “similar locality rule.” Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn. 1986); Haskins v. Howard, 159 Tenn. 86 , 16 S.W.2d 20 (1929); Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1941); 1975 Tenn. Pub. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Floyd v. Walls
green
2 sentences2003Historically, Tennessee followed the “strict locality rule” until it was legislatively supplanted in 1975 by Tennessee’s version of the “similar locality rule.” Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn. 1986); Haskins v. Howard, 159 Tenn. 86 , 16 S.W.2d 20 (1929); Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1941); 1975 Tenn. Pub. 2003Historically, Tennessee followed the “strict locality rule” until it was legislatively supplanted in 1975 by Tennessee’s version of the “similar locality rule.” Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn. 1986); Haskins v. Howard, 159 Tenn. 86 , 16 S.W.2d 20 (1929); Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1941); 1975 Tenn. Pub. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Haskins v. Howard
green
2 sentences2003Historically, Tennessee followed the “strict locality rule” until it was legislatively supplanted in 1975 by Tennessee’s version of the “similar locality rule.” Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn. 1986); Haskins v. Howard, 159 Tenn. 86 , 16 S.W.2d 20 (1929); Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1941); 1975 Tenn. Pub. 2003Historically, Tennessee followed the “strict locality rule” until it was legislatively supplanted in 1975 by Tennessee’s version of the “similar locality rule.” Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn. 1986); Haskins v. Howard, 159 Tenn. 86 , 16 S.W.2d 20 (1929); Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1941); 1975 Tenn. Pub. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams
green
1 sentence1996The Court in a footnote at 796, 103 S.Ct. at page 2710 of the opinion, traces the development of the standard and concluded: Where the identity of interested residents could not be ascertained after a diligent inquiry, however, their interest in property could be affected by the proceedings in rem as long as constructive notice was provided. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Ameraccount Club, Inc. v. Hill
green
1 sentence1995The development of this rule took place in a series of supreme court opinions in the 1980s, namely, Ameraccount Club, Inc. v. Hill, 617 S.W.2d 876 (Tenn.1981); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Fabricating, Inc., 673 S.W.2d 860 (Tenn.1980); and Chambers v. Dillow, 713 S.W.2d 896 (Tenn.1986). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Chambers v. Dillow
green
1 sentence1995The development of this rule took place in a series of supreme court opinions in the 1980s, namely, Ameraccount Club, Inc. v. Hill, 617 S.W.2d 876 (Tenn.1981); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Fabricating, Inc., 673 S.W.2d 860 (Tenn.1980); and Chambers v. Dillow, 713 S.W.2d 896 (Tenn.1986). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Security Bank & Trust Co. of Ponca City v. Fabricating, Inc.
green
1 sentence1995The development of this rule took place in a series of supreme court opinions in the 1980s, namely, Ameraccount Club, Inc. v. Hill, 617 S.W.2d 876 (Tenn.1981); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Fabricating, Inc., 673 S.W.2d 860 (Tenn.1980); and Chambers v. Dillow, 713 S.W.2d 896 (Tenn.1986). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Canola
green
2 sentences1988The formulation of the felony-murder principle by such authorities as Lord Coke, Foster, and Blackshire indicates that it applies only when the “felon or a confederate did the actual killing.” State v. Canola, 374 A.2d 20, 21 , 73 N.J. 206 (1977) (citing 24 Rutgers L.Rev. 591, 600-601 (1970)). 1988The formulation of the felony-murder principle by such authorities as Lord Coke, Foster, and Blackshire indicates that it applies only when the “felon or a confederate did the actual killing.” State v. Canola, 374 A.2d 20, 21 , 73 N.J. 206 (1977) (citing 24 Rutgers L.Rev. 591, 600-601 (1970)). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Eager v. McCoy
neutral
1 sentence1955We will say only that the limit, under the rule, for the creation of executory interests to commence, is “within the period of a life or lives in being and 21 years, allowing for the period of gestation.” Eager v. McCoy, 143 Tenn. 693 , 228 S. W. 709 ; Yarbrough v. Yarbrough, 151 Tenn. 221 , 269 S. W. 36 , and a host of others. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Yarbrough v. Yarbrough
green
1 sentence1955We will say only that the limit, under the rule, for the creation of executory interests to commence, is “within the period of a life or lives in being and 21 years, allowing for the period of gestation.” Eager v. McCoy, 143 Tenn. 693 , 228 S. W. 709 ; Yarbrough v. Yarbrough, 151 Tenn. 221 , 269 S. W. 36 , and a host of others. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Sternberger v. Glenn
green
2 sentences1943Malone, Esquire, who, as special justice of the (Supreme Court, also wrote the opinion in White v. O’ Bryan, supra. This article is referred to with approval in Sternberger v. Glenn, 175 Tenn., 644 , 137 S. W. (2d), 269 , and will be found profitable to those who have occasion to pursue the subject. 1943Malone, Esquire, who, as special justice of the (Supreme Court, also wrote the opinion in White v. O’ Bryan, supra. This article is referred to with approval in Sternberger v. Glenn, 175 Tenn., 644 , 137 S. W. (2d), 269 , and will be found profitable to those who have occasion to pursue the subject. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.