development clause (Kentucky) · Go Syfert
← Kentucky issues

development clause in Kentucky

9 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1933–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Cartellonegreen
ohnd · 1957 · cited in 1 Kentucky opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972
1 sentence

1972See also In the Matter of Adolfe Cartellone, 148 F.Supp. 676 (N.D.Ohio) 1957.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Smith v. Hodges green
kyctapp · 2005
2 sentences

2011An excellent and scholarly discussion of the development of the privilege to its present state in Kentucky law is set forth by Court of Appeals Judge Guidugli in Smith v. Hodges, 199 S.W.3d 185 (Ky.App.2005), and thus will not be discussed at length here.

2011An excellent and scholarly discussion of the development of the privilege to its present state in Kentucky law is set forth by Court of Appeals Judge Guidugli in Smith v. Hodges, 199 S.W.3d 185 (Ky.App.2005), and thus will not be discussed at length here.

12011–2011
Ratliff v. Epling green
kyctapphigh · 1966
1 sentence

1985Id.

11985–1985
AW SCHAFFER v. United States green
sdd · 1956
1 sentence

1972The Court, in limiting the scope of its review of a ruling of the department, said: “In the development of the doctrine and rule of administrative finality, courts have uniformly held that it is the exclusive province and function of administrative agencies to draw legitimate inferences of fact and make findings and conclusions of fact, to appraise conflicting testimony or other evidence, to judge the credibility of witnesses and the evidence adduced by the parties, and to determine the weight of the evidence (see cases cited in Schaffer v. United States, 139 F.Supp. 444 (S.D.1956)).

11972–1972
Sharp v. United States green
· 1903
2 sentences

1965See Nichols on Eminent Domain, 3rd Ed., Vol. 4, section 14.31(1), page 728; Sharp v. United States, 191 U.S. 341 , 24 S.Ct. 114 , 48 L.Ed. 211 ; United States ex rel.

1965See Nichols on Eminent Domain, 3rd Ed., Vol. 4, section 14.31(1), page 728; Sharp v. United States, 191 U.S. 341 , 24 S.Ct. 114 , 48 L.Ed. 211 ; United States ex rel.

11965–1965
Kentucky Home Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Wise green
kyctapp · 1961
1 sentence

1964We have recently reconsidered the doctrine from the standpoint of procedural effect in Kentucky Home Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Wise, Ky., 364 S.W.2d 338 , and Lee v. Tucker, Ky., 365 S.W.2d 849 , and have substantially accepted the views of Prosser. 2 The doctrine does no more than recognize the persuasive force of a particular kind of circumstantial evidence.

11964–1964
Lee v. Tucker green
kyctapphigh · 1963
1 sentence

1964We have recently reconsidered the doctrine from the standpoint of procedural effect in Kentucky Home Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Wise, Ky., 364 S.W.2d 338 , and Lee v. Tucker, Ky., 365 S.W.2d 849 , and have substantially accepted the views of Prosser. 2 The doctrine does no more than recognize the persuasive force of a particular kind of circumstantial evidence.

11964–1964
Freeland v. Edwards green
ill · 1957
2 sentences

1961The period is not to be extended by ‘indirect, ambiguous and negative language in the development clause,’ for oil and gas leases in case of ambiguity with respect *545 to development are construed to be for the benefit of the lessor and against the lessee.” In Freeland v. Edwards, 1957, 11 Ill.2d 395 , 142 N.E.2d 701, 702 , a Producers 88 form was used in making a lease for a 60-day primary term.

1961The period is not to be extended by ‘indirect, ambiguous and negative language in the development clause,’ for oil and gas leases in case of ambiguity with respect *545 to development are construed to be for the benefit of the lessor and against the lessee.” In Freeland v. Edwards, 1957, 11 Ill.2d 395 , 142 N.E.2d 701, 702 , a Producers 88 form was used in making a lease for a 60-day primary term.

11961–1961
Kelley v. Hardwick green
kyctapphigh · 1929
2 sentences

1957Fagan Co. v. Burns, 247 Mich. 674 , 226 N.W. 653 , 67 A.L.R. 522 ; Kelley v. Hardwick, 228 Ky. 349 , 14 S.W.2d 1098 .

1957Fagan Co. v. Burns, 247 Mich. 674 , 226 N.W. 653 , 67 A.L.R. 522 ; Kelley v. Hardwick, 228 Ky. 349 , 14 S.W.2d 1098 .

11957–1957
J. J. Fagan & Co. v. Burns green
mich · 1929
2 sentences

1957Fagan Co. v. Burns, 247 Mich. 674 , 226 N.W. 653 , 67 A.L.R. 522 ; Kelley v. Hardwick, 228 Ky. 349 , 14 S.W.2d 1098 .

1957Fagan Co. v. Burns, 247 Mich. 674 , 226 N.W. 653 , 67 A.L.R. 522 ; Kelley v. Hardwick, 228 Ky. 349 , 14 S.W.2d 1098 .

11957–1957
Commonwealth v. Manuel neutral
kyctapp · 1919
2 sentences

1946An exhaustive history of the development of this principle is contained in this Court’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Manuel, 183 Ky. 48 , 208 S. W. 327 .

1946An exhaustive history of the development of this principle is contained in this Court’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Manuel, 183 Ky. 48 , 208 S. W. 327 .

11946–1946
Guffey v. Smith green
scotus · 1915
2 sentences

1933Guffey v. Smith, 237 U. S. 101, 116 , 35 S. Ct. 526 , 59 L.

1933Guffey v. Smith, 237 U. S. 101, 116 , 35 S. Ct. 526 , 59 L.

11933–1933

Where else courts name it

NY 47 (1902–2025) CA 33 (1933–2026) PA 21 (1887–2024) FL 18 (1955–2020) MD 17 (1959–2022) WA 14 (1909–2008) MO 14 (1949–2019) TX 14 (1915–2023) NJ 13 (1955–2018) TN 12 (1943–2025) IL 12 (1931–2022) OR 12 (1895–2021) KS 11 (1934–2022) MA 10 (1921–2004) IA 10 (1914–2018) DC 10 (1973–2021) KY 9 (1933–2011) MI 9 (1929–2003) LA 8 (1931–2014) AL 8 (1915–2012) CO 7 (1905–2017) MN 7 (1948–2024) NM 7 (1921–2021) WY 6 (1923–1995) IN 6 (1958–2009) SD 5 (1927–1991) WV 5 (1947–2009) GA 5 (1905–2001) VT 5 (1880–2012) NC 5 (1913–2000) WI 5 (1941–2001) OK 4 (1926–1984) CT 4 (1975–1989) ID 4 (1982–2025) UT 4 (1944–2025) ND 3 (1893–2011) AZ 3 (2003–2008) VA 3 (1940–2008) RI 2 (1976–1981) AR 2 (1985–2016) NE 2 (1939–2001) OH 2 (1962–2019) MS 2 (1962–2022) HI 2 (2001–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check