10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Des Moines v. Public Employment Relations Boardgreen2 sentences2008See City of Des Moines v. PERB, 275 N.W.2d 753, 759 (Iowa 1979) (adopting the twofold test of standing derived from administrative agency cases involving statutes modeled after the Model State Administrative Procedure Act); John C. 2008See City of Des Moines v. PERB, 275 N.W.2d 753, 759 (Iowa 1979) (adopting the twofold test of standing derived from administrative agency cases involving statutes modeled after the Model State Administrative Procedure Act); John C. | 2 | 2 |
Miller v. Lawlorgreen1 sentence2018The Iowa Supreme Court recognized and set forth the elements of a promissory-estoppel claim in the seminal decision Miller v. Lawlor, 66 N.W.2d 267, 272 (Iowa 1954). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coffingreen2 sentences2014The test we have settled on to determine whether a crime is a lesser included offense of a greater crime generally inquires “whether the greater offense cannot be committed without also committing all elements of the lesser offense.” State v. Coffin, 504 N.W.2d 893, 894 (Iowa 1993). 2014The test we have settled on to determine whether a crime is a lesser included offense of a greater crime generally inquires “whether the greater offense cannot be committed without also committing all elements of the lesser offense.” State v. Coffin, 504 N.W.2d 893, 894 (Iowa 1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Graham v. Florida
green
2 sentences2016Graham, 560 U.S. at 78 , 130 S.Ct. at 2032 , 176 L.Ed.2d at 847-48 ; cf. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 320 , 122 S.Ct. at 2252 , 153 L.Ed.2d at 350 . xi. 2016Graham, 560 U.S. at 78 , 130 S.Ct. at 2032 , 176 L.Ed.2d at 847-48 ; cf. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 320 , 122 S.Ct. at 2252 , 153 L.Ed.2d at 350 . xi. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Atkins v. Virginia
green
2 sentences2016Graham, 560 U.S. at 78 , 130 S.Ct. at 2032 , 176 L.Ed.2d at 847-48 ; cf. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 320 , 122 S.Ct. at 2252 , 153 L.Ed.2d at 350 . xi. 2016Graham, 560 U.S. at 78 , 130 S.Ct. at 2032 , 176 L.Ed.2d at 847-48 ; cf. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 320 , 122 S.Ct. at 2252 , 153 L.Ed.2d at 350 . xi. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Humphrey
green
2 sentences1985We mentioned those hearings and their place in the development of their rule in our prior opinion. 355 N.W.2d at 568 . 1985We mentioned those hearings and their place in the development of their rule in our prior opinion. 355 N.W.2d at 568 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Sinift v. Sinift
green
2 sentences1968Up to and including Sinift v. Sinift, 229 Iowa 56 , 293 N.W. 841 , the rule as to join tenancy set out in Taylor v. Grimes, 223 Iowa 821, 826 , 273 N.W. 898 , was the law of Iowa. 1968Up to and including Sinift v. Sinift, 229 Iowa 56 , 293 N.W. 841 , the rule as to join tenancy set out in Taylor v. Grimes, 223 Iowa 821, 826 , 273 N.W. 898 , was the law of Iowa. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Taylor v. Grimes
green
2 sentences1968Up to and including Sinift v. Sinift, 229 Iowa 56 , 293 N.W. 841 , the rule as to join tenancy set out in Taylor v. Grimes, 223 Iowa 821, 826 , 273 N.W. 898 , was the law of Iowa. 1968Up to and including Sinift v. Sinift, 229 Iowa 56 , 293 N.W. 841 , the rule as to join tenancy set out in Taylor v. Grimes, 223 Iowa 821, 826 , 273 N.W. 898 , was the law of Iowa. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Christensen v. Floriston Pulp & Paper Co.
neutral
1 sentence1914The development of the rule as thus broadly stated is traced in Christensen v. Floriston Pulp & Paper Co., 29 Nev. 552 ( 92 Pac. 210 ); the court concluding that: The right to bring such an action in a foreign jurisdiction does not rest, as some of the decisions seem to put it, upon principles of comity, but rather because ‘the action by which the remedy is to be enforced is a personal, and not a real, action, and is of that character which the law recognizes as transitory, and not local. ’ Because the cause of action is in its nature transitory, courts of other jurisdictions will enforce such | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.