development doctrine in Minnesota

7 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earthgreen minn · 1988 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024See Minn. Stat. § 3.736 (2022); Nusbaum v. Blue Earth County, 422 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn. 1988) (discussing the development of the doctrine of sovereign immunity in Minnesota following our decision in Nieting v. Blondell, 235 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1975), and the passage of the Tort Claims Act).	1	1
State v. Laughlingreen minnctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003According to the court of appeals in State v. Laughlin, 508 N.W.2d 545, 548 (Minn.App.1993), because Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3C(1) “require[s] disqualification where there is an appearance of partiality, a [reviewing] court’s inquiry must go beyond the challenged judge’s statements and include an objective examination into the circumstances surrounding the removal request.” This objective examination displaces any deference that might otherwise be paid to the challenged judge’s decision to not re-cuse. 6 Respondents argue that our standard of review should be considerably narr	1	1
State v. Burnsgreen minn · 1943 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1948–1948 2 sentences 1948See, State v. Burns, 215 Minn. 182 , 9 N. W. (2d) 518 , where we had occasion to point out the difference in the development of the doctrine of respondeat superior in civil and criminal cases. 1948See, State v. Burns, 215 Minn. 182 , 9 N. W. (2d) 518 , where we had occasion to point out the difference in the development of the doctrine of respondeat superior in civil and criminal cases.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Nieting v. Blondell green minn · 1975 1 sentence 2024See Minn. Stat. § 3.736 (2022); Nusbaum v. Blue Earth County, 422 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn. 1988) (discussing the development of the doctrine of sovereign immunity in Minnesota following our decision in Nieting v. Blondell, 235 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1975), and the passage of the Tort Claims Act).	1	2024–2024
Almendarez-Torres v. United States red scotus · 1998 2 sentences 2006The prior conviction exception was first recognized in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). 4 The defendant in Almendarez-Toms was charged under a federal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1988), that made it a crime for “any alien” to return to the United States after deportation. 2006The prior conviction exception was first recognized in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). 4 The defendant in Almendarez-Toms was charged under a federal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1988), that made it a crime for “any alien” to return to the United States after deportation.	1	2006–2006
Kilowatt Organization (TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & Development green minn · 1983 2 sentences 1992(TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & Dev., 336 N.W.2d 529 (Minn.1983). (“Application of section 562.02 was consistent with the legislative goal of permitting public projects to advance by discouraging needlessly duplicative proceedings” even where litigant was not “irresponsible.” Id. at 532 .) Germane to the trial court’s holding in this case, the supreme court has also stated that the statute protects taxpayers against inordinate delays in the implementation of legislative acts. 1992(TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & Dev., 336 N.W.2d 529 (Minn.1983). (“Application of section 562.02 was consistent with the legislative goal of permitting public projects to advance by discouraging needlessly duplicative proceedings” even where litigant was not “irresponsible.” Id. at 532 .) Germane to the trial court’s holding in this case, the supreme court has also stated that the statute protects taxpayers against inordinate delays in the implementation of legislative acts.	1	1992–1992
Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. green minn · 1976 2 sentences 1987In particular, the court reviewed the case of Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 307 Minn. 48 , 240 N.W.2d 303 (1976), where the supreme court “appeared to have adopted the latent-patent danger rule which relieves a manufacturer from liability if the dangers of his product are obvious to the user.” Holm, 324 N.W.2d at 209-10 . 1987In particular, the court reviewed the case of Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 307 Minn. 48 , 240 N.W.2d 303 (1976), where the supreme court “appeared to have adopted the latent-patent danger rule which relieves a manufacturer from liability if the dangers of his product are obvious to the user.” Holm, 324 N.W.2d at 209-10 .	1	1987–1987
Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc. green minn · 1982 2 sentences 1987In particular, the court reviewed the case of Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 307 Minn. 48 , 240 N.W.2d 303 (1976), where the supreme court “appeared to have adopted the latent-patent danger rule which relieves a manufacturer from liability if the dangers of his product are obvious to the user.” Holm, 324 N.W.2d at 209-10 . 1987In particular, the court reviewed the case of Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 307 Minn. 48 , 240 N.W.2d 303 (1976), where the supreme court "appeared to have adopted the latent-patent danger rule which relieves a manufacturer from liability if the dangers of his product are obvious to the user." Holm, 324 N.W.2d at 209-10 .	1	1987–1987
Ober v. Golden Rule green minn · 1920 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. green minn · 1969 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Wood v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America green minn · 1942 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Rue v. Wendland green minn · 1948 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Dickson v. the Emporium Merc. Co. Inc. green minn · 1935 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Reber v. Hanson green wis · 1952 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973
Severson v. City of Beloit neutral wis · 1969 2 sentences 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952). 1973Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. 2d 617 (1942). 2 Id. 3 See, Dickson v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc. 193 Minn. 629 , 259 N. W. 375 (1935). 4 Cf. Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 283 Minn. 332 , 167 N. W. 2d 739 (1969). 5 See, Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , 178 N. W. 586 (1920). 6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. 2d 593 (1948). 7 For the development of this doctrine in Wisconsin, see Severson v. City of Beloit, 42 Wis. 2d 559 , 167 N. W. 2d 258 (1969); Reber v. Hanson, 260 Wis. 632 , 51 N. W. 2d 505 (1952).	1	1973–1973

Where else courts name it

NY 47 (1902–2025) CA 33 (1933–2026) PA 21 (1887–2024) FL 18 (1955–2020) MD 17 (1959–2022) WA 14 (1909–2008) MO 14 (1949–2019) TX 14 (1915–2023) NJ 13 (1955–2018) TN 12 (1943–2025) IL 12 (1931–2022) OR 12 (1895–2021) KS 11 (1934–2022) MA 10 (1921–2004) IA 10 (1914–2018) DC 10 (1973–2021) KY 9 (1933–2011) MI 9 (1929–2003) LA 8 (1931–2014) AL 8 (1915–2012) CO 7 (1905–2017) MN 7 (1948–2024) NM 7 (1921–2021) WY 6 (1923–1995) IN 6 (1958–2009) SD 5 (1927–1991) WV 5 (1947–2009) GA 5 (1905–2001) VT 5 (1880–2012) NC 5 (1913–2000) WI 5 (1941–2001) OK 4 (1926–1984) CT 4 (1975–1989) ID 4 (1982–2025) UT 4 (1944–2025) ND 3 (1893–2011) AZ 3 (2003–2008) VA 3 (1940–2008) RI 2 (1976–1981) AR 2 (1985–2016) NE 2 (1939–2001) OH 2 (1962–2019) MS 2 (1962–2022) HI 2 (2001–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check