11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Bagleygreen2 sentences2012The full formulation of the test is as follows: "The evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different." United States v. Bagley, supra, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 . [12] I note that, similar to the framework that I propose, the test governing whether a defendant is entitled to a new trial on the basis of a prosecutor's nondisclosure of material evidence applies regardless of whether the failure to disclose was intentional or merely negligent. 2012The full formulation of the test is as follows: "The evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different." United States v. Bagley, supra, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 . [12] I note that, similar to the framework that I propose, the test governing whether a defendant is entitled to a new trial on the basis of a prosecutor's nondisclosure of material evidence applies regardless of whether the failure to disclose was intentional or merely negligent. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Robert D. Sutton, James H. Fleming, and Michael L. Browngreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGrudergreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Steven G. Clarkgreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 1 |
cluster 788340green1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 1 |
State v. Stangegreen2 sentences2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. 2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. | 1 | 1 |
Catawba Indian Tribe Of South Carolina v. State Of South Carolinagreen1 sentence1997See, e.g., [United States v. Candelaria, supra, 442 ; Catawba Indian Tribe v. South Carolina, supra, 1298; Joint Tribal Council of Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton, supra, 377].” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Golden Hill, supra, 39 F.2d 59 . “[Consequently] . . . tribal status for purposes of obtaining federal benefits is not necessarily the same as tribal status under the Nonintercourse Act. . . . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Canbygreen1 sentence1988In State v. Guertin, supra, 453 , the court adopted the following rule as articulated in State v. Canby, 252 S.E.2d 164, 167 (W. | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Ivesgreen2 sentences1974See Baker v. Ives, 162 Conn. 295, 298 , 294 A.2d 290 , and the many cases cited; and see Fidelity Bank v. State, 166 Conn. 251 , 348 A.2d 633 , for a recent formulation of the doctrine. 1974See Baker v. Ives, 162 Conn. 295, 298 , 294 A.2d 290 , and the many cases cited; and see Fidelity Bank v. State, 166 Conn. 251 , 348 A.2d 633 , for a recent formulation of the doctrine. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. Charlesworth
green
2 sentences2024Finally, in Nelson v. Charlesworth, 82 Conn. App. 710 , 846 A.2d 923 (2004), this court held that an attorney’s fraudulent conduct was sufficient to allow the court to exercise its equitable authority to open the judgment after the passage of the four month period even though the judgment itself was not obtained by fraud, deviating from the traditional formulation of that exception.10 After the court granted the plaintiff’s motion for default against the defendant and rendered a judgment award- ing damages to the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s attorney and the defendant’s insurer engaged in settle 2024Finally, in Nelson v. Charlesworth, 82 Conn. App. 710 , 846 A.2d 923 (2004), this court held that an attorney’s fraudulent conduct was sufficient to allow the court to exercise its equitable authority to open the judgment after the passage of the four month period even though the judgment itself was not obtained by fraud, deviating from the traditional formulation of that exception.10 After the court granted the plaintiff’s motion for default against the defendant and rendered a judgment award- ing damages to the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s attorney and the defendant’s insurer engaged in settle | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Stillman v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
1 sentence2007The trial court concluded that because the record is devoid of evidence that the property has little or no value because of the setback regulations, no hardship has been shown.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 635-36 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Reid v. Holmes, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
green
1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Neaves v. City of San Diego, California
neutral
1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Armaly v. United States
neutral
1 sentence2006See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 388 F.3d 1199, 1256 (9th Cir. 2004) (error is harmful “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Clark, 385 F.3d 609, 619 (6th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless “unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict” [internal quotation marks omitted]); United States v. Crenshaw, 359 F.3d 977, 1004 (8th Cir. 2004) (error is harmless if “the substantial rights of the defendant were unaffected, and . . . the error did not influence | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Irala
green
1 sentence2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Westberry
green
1 sentence2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Westberry
green
2 sentences2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. 2003See State v. Stange, 212 Conn. 612, 616-17 , 563 A.2d 681 (1989); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (2); State v. Westberry, 68 Conn. App. 622, 627 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002); C. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Calogero Costa
green
2 sentences1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. 1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Leopold
green
2 sentences1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. 1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Hoyeson
green
2 sentences1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. 1993The defendant urges this court to construe § 53a-54a in accordance with three of our older cases; State v. Hoyeson, 154 Conn. 302 , 224 A.2d 735 (1966); State v. Leopold, 110 Conn. 55 , 147 A. 118 (1929); State v. Costa, 95 Conn. 140 , 110 A. 875 (1920); all of which recognized, in dictum, the doctrine of transferred intent in its traditional form. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
green
2 sentences1990This formula is known as the "cigarette rule", because of the companies involved in the formulation of the rule in the case of FTC v. Sperry Hutchinson Co., 405 U.S. 233 , 92 S.Ct. 898 , 31 L.Ed.2d 170 (1972). 1990This formula is known as the "cigarette rule", because of the companies involved in the formulation of the rule in the case of FTC v. Sperry Hutchinson Co., 405 U.S. 233 , 92 S.Ct. 898 , 31 L.Ed.2d 170 (1972). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Diaz v. United States
green
2 sentences1976This formulation of the rule was expressed in dictum in Diaz v. United States, 223 U.S. 442, 454 , 32 S. Ct. 250 , 56 L. 1976This formulation of the rule was expressed in dictum in Diaz v. United States, 223 U.S. 442, 454 , 32 S. Ct. 250 , 56 L. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Fidelity Bank v. State
green
2 sentences1974See Baker v. Ives, 162 Conn. 295, 298 , 294 A.2d 290 , and the many cases cited; and see Fidelity Bank v. State, 166 Conn. 251 , 348 A.2d 633 , for a recent formulation of the doctrine. 1974See Baker v. Ives, 162 Conn. 295, 298 , 294 A.2d 290 , and the many cases cited; and see Fidelity Bank v. State, 166 Conn. 251 , 348 A.2d 633 , for a recent formulation of the doctrine. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.