Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1957–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Saferiangreen2 sentences2002Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 95 , 315 N.E.2d 878, 882-83 (1974) (emphasis added). 2002Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 95 , 315 N.E.2d 878, 882-83 (1974) (emphasis added). | 2 | 2 |
Jampole v. Touchygreen2 sentences1996The cornerstone of discovery is to “seek the truth, so that disputes may be decided by what the facts reveal, not by what facts are concealed.” Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 573 (Tex.1984). 1996The cornerstone of discovery is to "seek the truth, so that disputes may be decided by what the facts reveal, not by what facts are concealed." Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 573 (Tex.1984). | 2 | 2 |
Izard v. Townsendgreen1 sentence2024However, relying on Izard v. Townsend, Appellants espouse a broader formulation of this exception whereby heirs have standing to bring suit on an estate’s behalf when “the interest of the estate requires action and there is no representative qualified to act.” See 208 S.W.2d 666, 668 (Tex. App.—Galveston 1948, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Gwendolyn E. Johnsongreen1 sentence2018Compare United States v. Johnson, 475 F.2d 977, 978 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
Lancon v. Stategreen1 sentence2010There is, therefore, no meaningful distinction between the Jackson v. Virginia legal-sufficiency standard and the Clewis factual-sufficiency standard, and these two standards have become indistinguishable. 19 A dissenting opinion in Lancon stated that the majority opinion “seems to say that from now on, the level of deference due a jury’s decision will be total deference when the decision is based on an evaluation of credibility.” See Lancon, 253 S.W.3d at 708 (Johnson, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
Sharp v. Broadway National Bankgreen2 sentences1996Sharp v. Broadway Nat’l Bank, 784 S.W.2d 669, 671 (Tex.1990); Tex.R.Civ.P. 215(5). 6 However, to properly answer the question presented by this point, it is helpful to analyze the policies and purposes underlying the formulation of the rule. 1996Sharp v. Broadway Nat'l Bank, 784 S.W.2d 669, 671 (Tex.1990); Tex.R.Civ.P. 215(5). [6] However, to properly answer the question presented by this point, it is helpful to analyze the policies and purposes underlying the formulation of the rule. | 1 | 1 |
Mohamed v. Exxon Corp.green1 sentence1994Mohamed v. Exxon Corp., 796 S.W.2d 751, 756 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Perez
green
2 sentences2014The classic formulation of the test for manifest necessity was penned by United States Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story in United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. 579, 580 , 6 L.Ed. 165 , 9 Wheat. 579 (1824) as follows: [w]e think, that in all cases of this nature, the law has invested Courts of justice with authority to discharge a jury for giving any verdict, whenever, in their opinion, taking all circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. 2014The classic formulation of the test for manifest necessity was penned by United States Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story in United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. 579, 580 , 6 L.Ed. 165 , 9 Wheat. 579 (1824) as follows: [w]e think, that in all cases of this nature, the law has invested Courts of justice with authority to discharge a jury for giving any verdict, whenever, in their opinion, taking all circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. | 3 | 2012–2014 |
Horton v. California
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 831–32. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Panetti v. Quarterman
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 957 , 127 S.Ct. 2842 (citing Ford, 477 U.S. at 409-10 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 ). 2017Id. at 957 , 127 S.Ct. 2842 (citing Ford, 477 U.S. at 409-10 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ford v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 957 , 127 S.Ct. 2842 (citing Ford, 477 U.S. at 409-10 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 ). 2017Id. at 957 , 127 S.Ct. 2842 (citing Ford, 477 U.S. at 409-10 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 1194-95 & n. 3 (citing Lohr, 518 U.S. at 485 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 and Rice, 331 U.S. at 230 , 67 S.Ct. 1146 ). 2010Id. at 1194-95 & n. 3 (citing Lohr, 518 U.S. at 485 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 and Rice, 331 U.S. at 230 , 67 S.Ct. 1146 ). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 1194-95 & n. 3 (citing Lohr, 518 U.S. at 485 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 and Rice, 331 U.S. at 230 , 67 S.Ct. 1146 ). 2010Id. at 1194-95 & n. 3 (citing Lohr, 518 U.S. at 485 , 116 S.Ct. 2240 and Rice, 331 U.S. at 230 , 67 S.Ct. 1146 ). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
City of Lancaster v. Chambers
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 656 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Underhill v. Hernandez
green
2 sentences1978Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves. 376 U.S. 398, 416 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 934 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964) quoting Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897). 1978Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves. 376 U.S. 398, 416 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 934 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964) quoting Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino
green
2 sentences1978Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves. 376 U.S. 398, 416 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 934 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964) quoting Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897). 1978Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves. 376 U.S. 398, 416 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 934 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964) quoting Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Hawkins v. Texas Co.
green
2 sentences1957In Hawkins v. Texas Co., 146 Tex. 511 , 209 S.W.2d 338, 340 , it was said that in the formulation of the rule that the order of the agency will be sustained if it is reasonably supported by substantial evidence, the word “reasonably” was deliberately used and its use “gives to the judicial review a broader scope than it would have if some substantial evidence were regarded sufficient * * *. 1957In Hawkins v. Texas Co., 146 Tex. 511 , 209 S.W.2d 338, 340 , it was said that in the formulation of the rule that the order of the agency will be sustained if it is reasonably supported by substantial evidence, the word “reasonably” was deliberately used and its use “gives to the judicial review a broader scope than it would have if some substantial evidence were regarded sufficient * * *. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.