11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.green1 sentence2015In Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 81 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), the court acknowledged the principle that a nonparty in the trial court is a “stranger to the record” but also ruled that the “unique circumstances” of that case gave the appellant standing to appeal. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andersongreen1 sentence2005The trial court acknowledged the error but found that the error was harmless because "Mathews' sentence was well within the statutory maximum and could have been imposed under a correct scoresheet." While we are aware of the recent Florida Supreme Court statement in State v. Anderson, 905 So.2d 111, 118 (Fla.2005), which indicates that the "would-have-been-imposed standard may be too speculative and subjective for purposes of rule 3.800(a)," the law of this district, as it presently stands, nevertheless requires the trial court to grant post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.800(a) unless t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Delvagreen1 sentence2005However, we concluded that "failure to instruct the jury on that element of the crime [knowledge that the substance was cocaine] could not be fundamental error" because this "was not at issue as a defense." Id. at 645. | 1 | 1 |
Wilson v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See Wilson v. State, 877 So.2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Porter v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See Porter v. State, 702 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
ERP Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Sanders
green
1 sentence2015This Court acknowledged that the rule that “a plaintiff cannot sustain this burden of proof by relying on pure speculation ... also applies to medical experts.” Id. at 799-800 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Huff v. State
green
1 sentence2004NOTES [1] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [2] The trial court acknowledged that analysis of the case was hampered by penalty phase counsel's limited personal recollection of the case and the loss of the public defender's case file. [3] These conclusions now mirror those of a forensic psychologist, Dr. Craig Beaver, also presented by Hodges during the postconviction proceeding. [4] Dr. Maher conceded that Hodges exhibited an emotional flatness during the initial evaluation prior to trial and that he must have simply missed the diagnosis at that time. [5] Contrary to the view expressed | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Turner v. Rinker Materials
green
1 sentence1994Indeed, when the pertinent language in section 440.34(3)(b) was first enacted, section 440.19(1)(e) did not even mention an acknowledged claim. [2] Furthermore, the employer/carrier's assertion that they may await receipt of an acknowledged claim despite having actual notice of the filed claim is inconsistent with the legislative intent, as expressed in section 440.015, Florida Statutes (1991), of assuring a quick and efficient delivery of benefits, and the characterization of the Workers' Compensation Law, as expressed in cases such as Turner v. Rinker Materials, 622 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 19 | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gunter v. Sauer, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1994As this court recently ruled in Gunter v. Sauer, Inc., 629 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) the 21 days begins to run from actual notice of a claim, not receipt of the acknowledged claim. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Chambers v. Maroney
green
1 sentence1983Rather, the court acknowledged that the exception was based on the fact that "the opportunity to search is fleeting since a car is readily movable." (Id. at *99 51, 90 S.Ct. at 1981 ). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Gray v. Bryant
green
1 sentence1978In Gray v. Bryant, supra, the Court acknowledged the principle that the will of the people is paramount in determining whether a constitutional amendment is self-executing and directed that the language of the provision be examined to determine whether implementing legislation is necessary. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Conran v. State
green
1 sentence1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Houchins v. State
neutral
1 sentence1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Pearce v. State
green
2 sentences1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . 1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Mayers v. State
green
2 sentences1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . 1958Pearce v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 347 , 196 So. 685 ; Mayers v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 640 , 171 So. 824 ; and Houchins v. State, 1944, 154 Fla. 283 , 17 So.2d 82 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.