acknowledged rule in Pennsylvania

1993Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court firmly held in Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219 , 108 S.Ct. 538 , 98 L.Ed.2d 555 (1988), that personnel decisions such as hiring and firing of court employees are administrative rather than judicial in na ture; and in Ellenbogen , the court acknowledged the principle that judges should devote their attention to judicial responsibilities rather than “non-judicial or non-adjudicatory” activities of the collective bargaining.

1993Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court firmly held in Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219 , 108 S.Ct. 538 , 98 L.Ed.2d 555 (1988), that personnel decisions such as hiring and firing of court employees are administrative rather than judicial in na ture; and in Ellenbogen , the court acknowledged the principle that judges should devote their attention to judicial responsibilities rather than “non-judicial or non-adjudicatory” activities of the collective bargaining.

2024The trial court acknowledged its standard of review, which was limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, whether an error of law was committed, and whether the Bureau’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.1 The trial court nevertheless concluded: 1 In Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 965 A.2d 226 (Pa. 2009), our Supreme Court recognized that the PPA is a hybrid regulatory agency with multiple functions at the local and statewide level.

2022In its Rule 1925(a) opinion, the trial court acknowledged the rule in Grant, but stated that it had exercised its discretion to consider Raker’s claims in post-sentence motions under the “good cause shown/waiver” exception to Grant carved out by our Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Holmes, 79 A.3d 562 (Pa. 2013) (holding trial court could exercise discretion to entertain ineffectiveness claims on post-sentence motions when claim of ineffectiveness is apparent from record and meritorious such that immediate consideration serves interest of justice or there is good cause shown and defendant has

2020Id. (emphasis added)).

2018We granted allowance of appeal to consider the following issue: "Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the PCRA court's grant of a new trial based on after-discovered evidence by finding that Tyson's testimony was merely cumulative and corroborative of the exculpatory evidence presented at [appellant]'s trial?" Commonwealth v. Small, --- Pa. ----, 172 A.3d 1117 (Pa. 2017) ( per curiam ).

2015Cushing ed., 1984) (Pennsylvania statute authorizing warrantless searches of ships by customs official but requiring a warrant for dwellings suspected of housing smuggled goods)). 4 *315 The United States Supreme Court first addressed a Fourth Amendment challenge to a warrantless search of a car in Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925).

2015Cushing ed., 1984) (Pennsylvania statute authorizing warrantless searches of ships by customs official but requiring a warrant for dwellings suspected of housing smuggled goods)). 4 *315 The United States Supreme Court first addressed a Fourth Amendment challenge to a warrantless search of a car in Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925).

2014Id. at 485, 17 A.3d at 322 .

2002Id. at 208, 107 S.Ct. 1702 .

2002Id. at 208, 107 S.Ct. 1702 .

1993However, the Court went on to explain that the “essence of this duty” was merely to extend “the compensatory damages necessary to make a plaintiff whole.” 496 Pa. at 66 , 436 A.2d at 154 .

1993However, the Court went on to explain that the “essence of this duty” was merely to extend “the compensatory damages necessary to make a plaintiff whole.” 496 Pa. at 66 , 436 A.2d at 154 .

1981When appellant Groves excepted, however, on the basis that interest is not recoverable on damages in unliquidated tort claims, the lower court acknowledged its error citing School Dist. of the City of Carbondale v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 346 Pa. 491 , 31 A.2d 279 (1943) for the proposition that interest runs only from the time of verdict.

1981When appellant Groves excepted, however, on the basis that interest is not recoverable on damages in unliquidated tort claims, the lower court acknowledged its error citing School Dist. of the City of Carbondale v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 346 Pa. 491 , 31 A.2d 279 (1943) for the proposition that interest runs only from the time of verdict.

1953In the case of Morin v. Kreidt, 310 Pa. 90, 97 , this Court said: “When a person is killed in an accident there is a presumption arising from the general knowledge of the strength of the instinct of self-preservation and the natural desire to avoid pain and injury to oneself that the deceased at the time of the accident was exercising due care.” The trial court acknowledged this presumption and then protected the defendant’s rights in over-measure by explaining: “Now, that presumption may be overcome by the testimony and that is for you to determine whether or not Eobert M.

1909(Per Story, J., in Hughes v. Blake, 1 Mason, 515 .) This exception to the maxim invoked by the defendant in error, if indeed it can strictly be called an exception, since it assumes the character of a general rule, is almost, if not altogether, coexistent with the rule itself. . . .

1869It is certainly an acknowledged principle that the entire capital stock of a corporation is a trust fund for the payment of its debts: Wood v. Dummer, 3 Mason 308 ; Mann v. Pentz, 3 Comst. 422.

1843It is an acknowledged principle that the title and disposition of real property is exclusively subject to the laws of the country where it is situated, which can alone prescribe the mode by which a title can pass from one person to another; ( 7 Cranch, 116 ; 6Wheat. 579; 9 Wheat. 571 ; 10 Wheat. 202 .) to which may be added the case of Bryant v. Hunter, to which we have been referred, as authorizing the sale of the Virginia lands, now asked to be directed. 2 Wheat. 32 , &c.

1843It is an acknowledged principle that the title and disposition of real property is exclusively subject to the laws of the country where it is situated, which can alone prescribe the mode by which a title can pass from one person to another; ( 7 Cranch, 116 ; 6Wheat. 579; 9 Wheat. 571 ; 10 Wheat. 202 .) to which may be added the case of Bryant v. Hunter, to which we have been referred, as authorizing the sale of the Virginia lands, now asked to be directed. 2 Wheat. 32 , &c.