Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re: Petition of J.J. T.R.green2 sentences2015The trial court acknowledged the presumption in favor of placing the child with a natural parent and applied the facts of this case to the five factors for determining whether terminating parental rights-is in the child’s best interest, pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-2363(b) (2012 Repl.); see generally In re J.J., 111 A.3d 1038 (D.C.2015). 2015The trial court acknowledged the presumption in favor of placing the child with a natural parent and applied the facts of this case to the five factors for determining whether terminating parental rights is in the child’s best interest, pursuant to D.C. 3 Code § 16-2353 (b) (2012 Repl.); see generally In re J.J., 111 A.3d 1038 (D.C. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
Blackman v. Visiting Nurses Ass'ngreen1 sentence2005Though the court acknowledged this rule, it did not apply the requisite de novo standard applicable to questions of law, see Blackman v. Visiting Nurses Ass'n, 694 A.2d 865, 868 (D.C.1997), holding-instead that the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sanders v. United States
green
2 sentences2026Id. at 4 . 2025Id. at 4 . | 2 | 2025–2026 |
McNeil v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences1993McNeil, supra, ___ U.S. at ___, 111 S.Ct. at 2207 . 1993McNeil, supra, — U.S. at -, 111 S.Ct. at 2207 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Battocchi v. Washington Hospital Center
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Boddie v. Robinson
green
1 sentence1992In Boddie the mailed notice of expiration of the redemption period erroneously listed the quadrant of the property owner’s address as “S.W.” instead of “N.W.,” thus violating the regulatory command that notice be mailed “to the last known address of the property owner as recorded in the real estate assessment records of the District.” Upon suit to set aside the tax deed, the defendant-appel- *44 lee argued that “this acknowledged error should not vitiate the sale because post office procedures corrected the District’s mistake.” 430 A.2d at 522 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Best v. United States
green
2 sentences1986On appeal, this court acknowledged that defense counsel made an incomplete and therefore "deficien[t]’’ proffer by failing to show how the hitting demonstrated the officer’s bias and how bias "was ultimately related to the question of guilt or innocence.” 328 A.2d at 382 . 1986On appeal, this court acknowledged that defense counsel made an incomplete and therefore "deficien[t]" proffer by failing to show how the hitting demonstrated the officer's bias and how bias "was ultimately related to the question of guilt or innocence." 328 A.2d at 382 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.