searching inquiry in Iowa

2019Id.

2019Id.

2019The NAACP notes that in Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ___ , ___, 136 S. Ct. 1737 , 1754–55 (2016), the Supreme Court required trial courts to engage in a searching inquiry of the prosecutor’s demeanor and stated justifications for striking jurors of color, including a comparative juror analysis to determine whether the stated race-neutral reasons for striking black jurors were in fact even-handedly applied to white jurors.

2019The NAACP notes that in Foster v. Chatman , 578 U.S. ----, ----, 136 S. Ct. 1737 , 1754-55, 195 L.Ed.2d 1 (2016), the Supreme Court required trial courts to engage in a searching inquiry of the prosecutor's demeanor and stated justifications for striking jurors of color, including a comparative juror analysis to determine whether the stated race-neutral reasons for striking black jurors were in fact even-handedly applied to white jurors.

2019Further, in Peña-Rodriguez, 580 U.S. at ___, 137 S. Ct. at 868–69, the NAACP points out that the Supreme Court noted that racially biased comments in jury deliberations could require the trial court to overturn a jury verdict.

2019Further, in Peña-Rodriguez , 580 U.S. at ----, 137 S. Ct. at 868 -69 , the NAACP points out that the Supreme Court noted that racially biased comments in jury deliberations could require the trial court to overturn a jury verdict.

2009While the decision in IPO requires a more searching analysis than earlier Second Circuit precedent, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals also warned courts against engaging in such an extensive analysis of an expert’s credibility that it must make a decision on the merits of the case. 471 F.3d at 41 .

2009First, the amended rule removes . . . the provision that class certification “may be conditional.” Second, the amended rule replaces the provision . . . that a class certification decision be made “as soon as practicable” with a provision requiring the decision “at an early practicable time.” IPO, 471 F.3d at 39 . 14 against engaging in such an extensive analysis of an expert’s credibility that it must make a decision on the merits of the case. 471 F.3d at 41 .

2019Davis, Bd. of Trs., 225 F.3d 1115, 1124 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting Schnidrig v. Columbia Mach., Inc., 80 F.3d 1406 , 1410 (9th Cir. 1996)).

2019Davis, Bd. of Trs. , 225 F.3d 1115 , 1124 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting Schnidrig v. Columbia Mach., Inc. , 80 F.3d 1406 , 1410 (9th Cir. 1996) ).

2012The centrality of the home in search and seizure law dictates that we engage in a searching analysis before we conclude that the constitutional right to privacy in the home has been waived in the knock-and-talk context. “[T]he closer officers come to intrusion into a dwelling, the greater the constitutional protection.” State v. Ferrier, 136 Wash.2d 103 , 960 P.2d 927, 931 (1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Brown, 356 Ark. 460 , 156 S.W.3d 722, 731 (2004) (fundamental interest in the home requires that any violation requires strict scrutiny and compelling

1974Rather, such rebuttal evidence is admitted under the test, "[D]id the criminal design originate in the mind of the accused, or was such design originated in the mind of the entrapping officer?" State v. Heeron, supra. As stated in Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 451 , 53 S.Ct. 210, 216 , 77 L.Ed. 413, 422 , "[I]f the defendant seeks acquittal by reason of entrapment he cannot complain of an appropriate and searching inquiry into his own conduct and predisposition as bearing upon that issue." I have been able to find very few decisions supporting this court's present position.

1974Rather, such rebuttal evidence is admitted under the test, "[D]id the criminal design originate in the mind of the accused, or was such design originated in the mind of the entrapping officer?" State v. Heeron, supra. As stated in Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 451 , 53 S.Ct. 210, 216 , 77 L.Ed. 413, 422 , "[I]f the defendant seeks acquittal by reason of entrapment he cannot complain of an appropriate and searching inquiry into his own conduct and predisposition as bearing upon that issue." I have been able to find very few decisions supporting this court's present position.

1969Thurmond v. Mancusi, (D.C.) 275 F.Supp. 508 , another habeas case, the court in vacating a state court judgment of conviction, and remanding, said at page 519: “A searching inquiry by the court at the time the defendant enters his plea is the most reliable and efficient means of determining whether the defendant fully understands the nature of the commitment that has been made to him.

1969Thurmond v. Mancusi, (D.C.) 275 F.Supp. 508 , another habeas case, the court in vacating a state court judgment of conviction, and remanding, said at page 519: "A searching inquiry by the court at the time the defendant enters his plea is the most reliable and efficient means of determining whether the defendant fully understands the nature of the commitment that has been made to him.