11 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1881–1964 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kileen v. Kennedygreen2 sentences1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. 1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. | 1 | 1 |
Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co.green2 sentences1935See also Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co. 91 Minn. 482 , 98 N. W. 463 ; and the annotation “Judgment as lien on judgment debtor’s equitable interest in real property,” 30 A. L. 1935See also Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co. 91 Minn. 482 , 98 N. W. 463 ; and the annotation “Judgment as lien on judgment debtor’s equitable interest in real property,” 30 A. L. | 1 | 1 |
Marston v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1904See also Marston v. Williams, 45 Minn. 116 ; 47 N. W. 644 . 1904See also Marston v. Williams, 45 Minn. 116 ; 47 N. W. 644 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Newlin v. Hoyt
green
2 sentences1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. 1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Ferguson v. Trovaten
green
2 sentences1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. 1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Bey v. Keeping
green
2 sentences1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. 1964See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N. W. 126 ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , 98 N. W. 323 ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , 102 N. W. 373 . *497 In Bey v. Keeping, 192 Minn. 283 , 256 N. W. 140 , also, we held that in order to conform to the requirements of the statute of frauds the acceptance of the terms of a written proposal for the purchase of real estate must be in writing. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Krause v. Krause
green
1 sentence1964In Krause v. Krause, 285 N. Y. 27 , 32 N. E. (2d) 779, the trust was found to be illusory in an opinion which apparently held that under the facts in that case there was an intent to cut off the surviving spouse with little or nothing. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Ristau v. Riley
green
2 sentences1959In Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 , this court laid down a rule which we think has application here. 1959In Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 , this court laid down a rule which we think has application here. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Heinrich v. Englund
neutral
2 sentences1958Whitaker v. McClung, 14 Minn. 131 (170); Leyde v. Martin, 16 Minn. 24 (38); Heinrich v. Englund, 34 Minn. 395 , 26 N. W. 122 ; Ferch v. Hiller, 209 Minn. 124 , 295 N. W. 504 . 1958Whitaker v. McClung, 14 Minn. 131 (170); Leyde v. Martin, 16 Minn. 24 (38); Heinrich v. Englund, 34 Minn. 395 , 26 N. W. 122 ; Ferch v. Hiller, 209 Minn. 124 , 295 N. W. 504 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Friederick v. Skellet Co.
neutral
2 sentences1958It is our opinion that this court laid down the rule applicable to this case in Friederick v. Skellet Co. 180 Minn. 382 , 231 N. W. 7 . 1958It is our opinion that this court laid down the rule applicable to this case in Friederick v. Skellet Co. 180 Minn. 382 , 231 N. W. 7 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Ferch v. Hiller
green
2 sentences1958Whitaker v. McClung, 14 Minn. 131 (170); Leyde v. Martin, 16 Minn. 24 (38); Heinrich v. Englund, 34 Minn. 395 , 26 N. W. 122 ; Ferch v. Hiller, 209 Minn. 124 , 295 N. W. 504 . 1958Whitaker v. McClung, 14 Minn. 131 (170); Leyde v. Martin, 16 Minn. 24 (38); Heinrich v. Englund, 34 Minn. 395 , 26 N. W. 122 ; Ferch v. Hiller, 209 Minn. 124 , 295 N. W. 504 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Barrett v. Smith
green
1 sentence1945Minn. 431, 237 N. W. 15 , where it stated: “* * * And if the matter is to be reconsidered, the first order should be vacated pending the reconsideration.” No notice was served upon plaintiff of the filing of the first order denying the motion for new trial. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Follansbee v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences1908This court laid down the rule in Follansbee v. Johnson, 28 Minn. 311 , 9 N. W. 882 , following the general trend of the adjudicated cases elsewhere, that the grantee in a deed of conveyance, by assuming the payment of an outstanding mortgage on the land, for which his grantor is personally liable, legally obligates himself to pay the debt, and his contract may be enforced by the mortgagee. 1908This court laid down the rule in Follansbee v. Johnson, 28 Minn. 311 , 9 N. W. 882 , following the general trend of the adjudicated cases elsewhere, that the grantee in a deed of conveyance, by assuming the payment of an outstanding mortgage on the land, for which his grantor is personally liable, legally obligates himself to pay the debt, and his contract may be enforced by the mortgagee. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Atwater v. Manchester Savings Bank
green
2 sentences1904Bank, 45 Minn. 341 , 48 N. W. 187 , this court laid down the rule that under the statutes above cited equitable interests in real property are subject to the lien of a judgment, and may be sold on execution. 1904Bank, 45 Minn. 341 , 48 N. W. 187 , this court laid down the rule that under the statutes above cited equitable interests in real property are subject to the lien of a judgment, and may be sold on execution. | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Reitan v. Goebel
neutral
2 sentences1900In Reitan v. Goebel, 33 Minn. 151 , 22 N. W. 291 , the court laid down the rule that words charging an unmarried female with incontinence are actionable per se. 1900In Reitan v. Goebel, 33 Minn. 151 , 22 N. W. 291 , the court laid down the rule that words charging an unmarried female with incontinence are actionable per se. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Chalmers v. Whittemore
neutral
1 sentence1881In Chalmers v. Whittemore, 22 Minn. 305 , this court laid down the rule that “where an unauthorized communication is made to a juror in a cause on trial, which may have influenced his mind in favor of the successful party, a new trial will be granted for that reason; but if it is apparent that the communication could not have had such influence, it is no ground for a new trial.” And in Koehler v. Cleary 23 Minn. 325 , “the proper rule in such cases we deem to be, that if it does not appear that the misconduct was occasioned by the prevailing party, or any one in his behalf, and if it does not | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Koehler v. Cleary
neutral
1 sentence1881In Chalmers v. Whittemore, 22 Minn. 305 , this court laid down the rule that “where an unauthorized communication is made to a juror in a cause on trial, which may have influenced his mind in favor of the successful party, a new trial will be granted for that reason; but if it is apparent that the communication could not have had such influence, it is no ground for a new trial.” And in Koehler v. Cleary 23 Minn. 325 , “the proper rule in such cases we deem to be, that if it does not appear that the misconduct was occasioned by the prevailing party, or any one in his behalf, and if it does not | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.