time-honored rule in Ohio

11 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Renalist, Inc.green ohio · 1978 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015“The necessity for a court adhering to this time-honored presumption is that it prohibits one branch of state government from encroaching on the duties and prerogatives of another.” State v. Renalist, Inc., 56 Ohio St.2d 276, 278 (1978).	1	1
Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organizationgreen scotus · 1939 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 1 sentence 1986We begin with the time-honored principle that: “ * * * Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.” Hague v. CIO (1939), 307 U.S. 496, 515 (opinion of Roberts, J.).	1	1
Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals, Inc.green ohio · 1981 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 2 sentences 1983In Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 86, 90 [ 20 O.O.3d 71 ], this court, in footnote 5 to the opinion written by Justice Sweeney, stated that R.C. 2315.19 need not be considered in a cause of action which arose prior to its effective date but was tried after such date. 1983In Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 86, 90 [ 20 O.O.3d 71 ], this court, in footnote 5 to the opinion written by Justice Sweeney, stated that R.C. 2315.19 need not be considered in a cause of action which arose prior to its effective date but was tried after such date.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. green ohio · 1988 2 sentences 2017We begin, therefore, “with the time-honored rule that words used by the General Assembly are to be construed according to their common usage.” Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 100, 103 . 2014We begin, therefore, ‘with the time-honored rule that words used by the General Assembly are to be construed according to their common usage.’ Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 100, 103 , 522 N.E.2d 489 .	5	2005–2017
Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc. green ohio · 1990 1 sentence 2005In our opinion, such a message should never be countenanced by this court." 49 Ohio St.3d at 291 -292 ; see, also, Stehr v. TGI Friday's, Inc. (Oct. 28, 1999), Cuyahoga App. No. 74846 (following Smith and prohibiting a cause of action for injuries sustained by reason of one's own intoxication). {¶ 5} It is a time-honored rule in Ohio that an intoxicated person has no cause of action against a liquor permit holder under R.C. 4301.22 (B) where the injury, death, or property damage sustained by the intoxicated person off the premises of the permit holder was proximately caused by the patron's own	1	2005–2005
Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc. green ohio · 1999 1 sentence 2005Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc. (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 419 , 715 N.E.2d 536 ; Fifer v. Buffalo Café (1991), 76 Ohio App.3d 297 , 601 N.E.2d 601 .	1	2005–2005
Fifer v. Buffalo Cafe green ohioctapp · 1991 2 sentences 2005Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc. (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 419 , 715 N.E.2d 536 ; Fifer v. Buffalo Café (1991), 76 Ohio App.3d 297 , 601 N.E.2d 601 . 2005Klever v. Canton Sachsenheim, Inc. (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 419 , 715 N.E.2d 536 ; Fifer v. Buffalo Café (1991), 76 Ohio App.3d 297 , 601 N.E.2d 601 .	1	2005–2005
In re Cunningham green ohio · 1979 2 sentences 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 . 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 .	1	1988–1988
Pruitt v. Jones green ohio · 1980 2 sentences 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 . 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 .	1	1988–1988
In re Palmer green ohio · 1984 2 sentences 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 . 1988See Gishwiler v. Dodez (1855), 4 Ohio St. 615 ; In re Cunningham (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 100 , 13 O.O. 3d 78, 391 N.E. 2d 1034 ; Pruitt v. Jones (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 237 , 16 O.O. 3d 276, 405 N.E. 2d 276 ; In re Palmer (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 194 , 12 OBR 259, 465 N.E. 2d 1312 .	1	1988–1988
Eastman v. State green · 1936 2 sentences 1988Eastman v. State (1936), 131 Ohio St. 1 , 5 O.O. 248 , 1 N.E. 2d 140 , paragraph five of the syllabus; R.C. 1.42. 1988Eastman v. State (1936), 131 Ohio St. 1 , 5 O.O. 248 , 1 N.E. 2d 140 , paragraph five of the syllabus; R.C. 1.42.	1	1988–1988
United States v. Grace green scotus · 1983 1 sentence 1986Included in the category of public forum property are sidewalks: “ * * * Sidewalks, of course, are among those areas of public property that traditionally have been held open to the public for expressive activities and are clearly within those areas of public property that may be considered, generally without further inquiry, to be public forum property.” United States v. Grace (1983), 461 U.S. 171, 179 .	1	1986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.02 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 104 (1901–2025) PA 52 (1919–2018) FL 31 (1955–2014) NY 29 (1941–2023) TX 21 (1930–2026) TN 20 (1979–2022) IL 15 (1947–2005) VA 15 (1996–2026) OK 14 (1961–2020) GA 13 (1934–2008) MO 13 (1913–2018) CT 12 (1985–2021) OH 11 (1983–2017) MI 10 (1966–2025) IA 9 (1961–2026) KS 9 (1970–2018) MD 8 (1991–2026) MS 8 (1969–2017) WI 7 (1940–2023) LA 6 (1971–2024) NJ 6 (1951–2010) IN 6 (1980–2020) UT 6 (1951–2019) DE 5 (1966–1997) AL 4 (1975–1992) MN 4 (1984–2000) WV 4 (1932–2013) WA 4 (1899–1970) ID 4 (1959–2017) CO 4 (1998–2026) AZ 3 (1971–1994) MT 3 (1935–2002) RI 3 (1983–2010) KY 3 (1968–2012) NC 3 (1995–2010) OR 2 (2001–2019) NV 2 (1942–1985) AR 2 (1986–1998) ND 2 (1980–1994) NM 2 (1955–2025) WY 2 (1981–1981) DC 2 (1947–1995) HI 2 (1967–2002) ME 2 (1976–1978)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check