6 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2013In Brown v. State, 458 N.E.2d 245, 248-49 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983), we noted “the time-honored principle that a statutory requirement of verification of pleadings is not jurisdictional.” Want of verification is waived if an objection is not presented at the earliest possible opportunity. 2013Id. at 249 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garciagreen1 sentence2000Garcia, 500 N.E.2d at 163-64 (DeBruler, J. dissenting) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lori Barcroft v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2020I respectfully dissent from this opinion fundamentally misapplying the time-honored standard of review this Court recently reaffirmed in Barcroft v. State, 111 N.E.3d 997 (Ind. 2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Farm Credit Services of Mid-America v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
green
1 sentence1999In Farm Credit *1092 Services, 677 N.E.2d at 647 , the Court stated that “[t]he parties do not dispute the time-honored rule that the federal government and its instrumentalities are immune from state and local taxation absent express waiver by Congress.” In this case, the Department contends that there is no such rule and that federal instrumentalities are subject to state taxation unless Congress expressly exempts them from state taxation. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Beecher v. White
green
1 sentence1983As Judge Neal recently observed, "[i}n our decision we must be ever mindful that we are not engaged in the fabrication or selection of the wisest, or most desirable [,] of a number of possible courses in the common law." Beecher v. White (1983) Ind.App., 447 N.E.2d 622 , Any other course would sound the death knell for the time honored principle that this court will not engage in judicial legislation. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc.
green
2 sentences1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind. App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . 1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind.App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Beavers
green
2 sentences1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind. App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . 1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind.App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind. App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . 1980Gross Income Tax Division v. National Bank & Trust Co. (1948), 226 Ind. 293 , 79 N.E.2d 651 ; Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. (1978), Ind.App., 380 N.E.2d 555 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.