time-honored rule in Louisiana

2024Russell v. Goldsby, 2000-2595, 780 So.2d 1048 (La. 9/22/00).

2009CKB & Associates, Inc. v. Moore McCormack Petroleum, Inc., 734 S.W.2d 653, 655 (Tex.1987); State, Dep’t of Public Safety & Corrections v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm., 94-1872, p. 17 (La.5/22/95), 655 So.2d 292, 302 ; Lamonica & Jones, 20 La.

2009State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-1872, p. 17 (La.5/22/95), 655 So.2d 292, 802 ; Lamonica & Jones, 20 La.

1993The overwhelming importance of open employment opportunity and job mobility is a time-honored principle deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, enshrined in such landmark cases as Pitcher v. United Oil and Gas Syndicate, 174 La. 66 ; 139 So. 760 (1932), wherein the Supreme Court held: An employee is never presumed to engage his services permanently, thereby cutting himself off from all chances of improving his condition; indeed, in this land of opportunity it would be against public policy and the spirit of our institutions that any man should thus handicap himself; and the law will presume almost

1993The overwhelming importance of open employment opportunity and job mobility is a time-honored principle deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, enshrined in such landmark cases as Pitcher v. United Oil and Gas Syndicate, 174 La. 66 ; 139 So. 760 (1932), wherein the Supreme Court held: An employee is never presumed to engage his services permanently, thereby cutting himself off from all chances of improving his condition; indeed, in this land of opportunity it would be against public policy and the spirit of our institutions that any man should thus handicap himself; and the law will presume almost

1985The time-honored standard for determining whether a modification of alimony penden-te lite is warranted is “change of circumstances.” Whatley v. Whatley, 430 So.2d 129 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1983); Creech v. Creech, 449 So.2d 1192 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1984); La.C.C.

1985The time-honored standard for determining whether a modification of alimony penden-te lite is warranted is “change of circumstances.” Whatley v. Whatley, 430 So.2d 129 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1983); Creech v. Creech, 449 So.2d 1192 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1984); La.C.C.

1973Nevertheless, we do not believe that interpretation and decision of pension plan disputes by a committee would license arbitrary or capricious action under Louisiana law any more than under New York law. *793 As to the actions of public boards or bodies the Louisiana law is described in Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess, 252 La. 136 , 209 So.2d 733 (1968), as follows: "... the time-honored rule that it is not the province of the judiciary to substitute its judgment for that of a legislative or administrative body unless the action of such body is unsupported by evidence and hen

1973Nevertheless, we do not believe that interpretation and decision of pension plan disputes by a committee would license arbitrary or capricious action under Louisiana law any more than under New York law. *793 As to the actions of public boards or bodies the Louisiana law is described in Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess, 252 La. 136 , 209 So.2d 733 (1968), as follows: "... the time-honored rule that it is not the province of the judiciary to substitute its judgment for that of a legislative or administrative body unless the action of such body is unsupported by evidence and hen

1971Moreira v. Schwan, 113 La. 643 , 37 So. 542 ; Stinson v. Marston, above.

1971Moreira v. Schwan, 113 La. 643 , 37 So. 542 ; Stinson v. Marston, above.