continued hearing (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

continued hearing in Michigan

10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Chapin v. Perringreen
mich · 1881 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See, e.g., Dora v Lesinski, 351 Mich 579, 582 ; 88 NW2d 592 (1958), quoting Chapin, 46 Mich at 131 (“As Justice Cooley said in the Chapin case: ‘But neither party can complain of a consent order, for the error in it, if there is any, is their own, and not the error of the court.’ ”).

11
Dora v. Lesinskigreen
mich · 1958 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024See, e.g., Dora v Lesinski, 351 Mich 579, 582 ; 88 NW2d 592 (1958), quoting Chapin, 46 Mich at 131 (“As Justice Cooley said in the Chapin case: ‘But neither party can complain of a consent order, for the error in it, if there is any, is their own, and not the error of the court.’ ”).

2024See, e.g., Dora v Lesinski, 351 Mich 579, 582 ; 88 NW2d 592 (1958), quoting Chapin, 46 Mich at 131 (“As Justice Cooley said in the Chapin case: ‘But neither party can complain of a consent order, for the error in it, if there is any, is their own, and not the error of the court.’ ”).

11
General Motors Corp. v. Department of Treasurygreen
michctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015See Gen Motors Corp v Dep’t of Treasury, 290 Mich App 355, 387 ; 803 NW2d 698 (2010).

2015See Gen Motors Corp v Dep’t of Treasury, 290 Mich App 355, 387 ; 803 NW2d 698 (2010).

11
Keller v. Lockegreen
michctapp · 1975 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See, e.g., Keller v Locke, 62 Mich App 591, 592-593 ; 233 NW2d 666 (1975) (infrequent and minor maintenance will not make a public highway out of a private road).

2003See, e.g., Keller v Locke, 62 Mich App 591, 592-593 ; 233 NW2d 666 (1975) (infrequent and minor maintenance will not make a public highway out of a private road).

11
Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.green
mich · 1971 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994See Farrington, Franks, and Dussia, supra. Third, MCL 418.331(l)(b); MSA 17.237(331)(l)(b) does not require the continued presumption of dependency in cases of remarriage of the surviving spouse or the end of the 500-week benefits period.

11
People v. Crittlegreen
mich · 1973 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974
2 sentences

1974This instruction refers to a capacity standard which has been rejected as it relates to specific-intent crimes by a unanimous Michigan Supreme Court in People v Crittle, 390 Mich 367, 372 ; 212 NW2d 196, 198-199 (1973).

1974This instruction refers to a capacity standard which has been rejected as it relates to specific-intent crimes by a unanimous Michigan Supreme Court in People v Crittle, 390 Mich 367, 372 ; 212 NW2d 196, 198-199 (1973).

11
People v. Holbrookgreen
mich · 1964 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
1 sentence

1966See People v. Holbrook (1964), 373 Mich 94 , where the Court was not so moved by a considerable history of administrative disregard of explicit statutory commands as to give an unlawful practice its imprimature.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Kessler v. Kessler green
michctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2015In relation to all issues on remand, we note that “the trial court ‘should consider up-to- date information’ and ‘any other changes in circumstances arising since the trial court’s original custody order.’ ” Kessler v Kessler, 295 Mich App 54, 62-63 ; 811 NW2d 39 (2011), quoting Fletcher, 447 Mich at 889 .

2015In relation to all issues on remand, we note that “the trial court ‘should consider up-to- date information’ and ‘any other changes in circumstances arising since the trial court’s original custody order.’ ” Kessler v Kessler, 295 Mich App 54, 62-63 ; 811 NW2d 39 (2011), quoting Fletcher, 447 Mich at 889 .

12015–2015
Fletcher v. Fletcher green
mich · 1994
1 sentence

2015In relation to all issues on remand, we note that “the trial court ‘should consider up-to- date information’ and ‘any other changes in circumstances arising since the trial court’s original custody order.’ ” Kessler v Kessler, 295 Mich App 54, 62-63 ; 811 NW2d 39 (2011), quoting Fletcher, 447 Mich at 889 .

12015–2015
Columbia Casualty Co. v. Klettke green
mich · 1932
2 sentences

1993But where the same matter has been actually tried, or so in issue that it might have been tried, it is not again admissible; the party is estopped to set up such fraud, because the judgment is the highest evidence and cannot be contradicted.' "In accordance with the principles laid down above, it is held, by the weight of authority, that neither perjury nor forgery is sufficient ground for equitable interference." [ Id. at 565-567.] The Court continued that the principle set forth in Pomeroy had been approved by this Court in earlier cases. [3] In Fawcett , the Court quoted at length from Colu

1993But where the same matter has been actually tried, or so in issue that it might have been tried, it is not again admissible; the party is estopped to set up such fraud, because the judgment is the highest evidence and cannot be contradicted.’ "In accordance with the principles laid down above, it is held, by the weight of authority, that neither perjury nor forgery is sufficient ground for equitable interference.” [Id. at 565-567.] The Court continued that the principle set forth in Pomeroy had been approved by this Court in earlier cases. 3 In Fawcett , the Court quoted at length from Columbi

11993–1993
People v. Latzman green
michctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1987Latzman, supra, p 273 .

11987–1987
Murray v. Hudson green
mich · 1887
1 sentence

1951“In Murray v. Hudson, 65 Mich 670 , we approved the following: “ ‘To constitute possession it is not necessary that the land should be enclosed with a fence, or that the same should be cultivated or resided upon, or that buildings should be erected thereon.

11951–1951
Fractional School District No. 4 v. Hedlund neutral
mich · 1951
1 sentence

1951Where property is so situated as not to admit of permanent useful improvements, the continued claim of the party, evidenced by public acts of ownership such as he would exercise over property which he claimed in his own. right and would not exercise over property which he did not claim, may constitute actual possession.” A recent expression of the applicable test is to be found in Fractional School District No. 4 of Golden Township, Oceana County v. Hedlund, 330 Mich 73 , as follows: “In order to claim title by adverse possession the acts of possession must be open and of a hostile character.

11951–1951

Where else courts name it

CA 146 (1881–2026) TX 41 (1915–2025) IL 29 (1895–2025) NY 25 (1941–2025) PA 21 (1941–2023) OH 17 (1932–2026) OR 14 (1959–2025) FL 13 (1964–2024) MO 12 (1894–2019) MS 11 (1904–2022) MI 10 (1951–2024) AZ 9 (1973–2023) NJ 8 (1926–2008) AL 8 (1988–2009) IN 8 (1875–2012) CT 8 (1940–2020) VT 8 (1990–2024) HI 7 (1990–2021) GA 6 (1978–2008) DC 6 (1971–2024) CO 6 (1915–2026) VA 6 (1994–2025) AR 5 (1925–2017) LA 5 (1892–2007) MD 5 (1992–2013) RI 5 (1903–2011) TN 5 (1993–2023) ME 5 (1967–2002) NE 5 (1906–2013) KS 4 (1994–2014) KY 4 (1988–2023) AK 4 (1988–2024) WI 4 (1938–2026) UT 4 (2014–2015) NM 4 (1946–2012) MN 3 (1897–1989) SD 3 (1988–2022) OK 3 (1931–2003) IA 3 (1989–2022) ID 3 (1916–2011) NC 2 (1930–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check