continued hearing (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

continued hearing in Arkansas

5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Jackson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services green
arkctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2017Jackson, 2013 Ark.

12017–2017
Goodloe v. Goodloe green
arkctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2013At the continued hearing, the court found that Ms. Headlee was not credible. 2 Cite as 2013 Ark.

12013–2013
McDonald v. Fort Smith & Western Railroad green
ark · 1912
2 sentences

1972Co., 105 Ark. 5 , 150 S.W. 135 , to permit a judgment to be disregarded as void on collateral attack.

1972Co., 105 Ark. 5 , 150 S.W. 135 , to permit a judgment to be disregarded as void on collateral attack.

11972–1972
Wilson v. Luck green
ark · 1941
2 sentences

1951In Wilson v. Luck, 203 Ark. 377 , 156 S. W. 2d 795 , there was presented the question of voters voting in the wrong township, and Mr. Justice Frank Gr.

1951In Wilson v. Luck, 203 Ark. 377 , 156 S. W. 2d 795 , there was presented the question of voters voting in the wrong township, and Mr. Justice Frank Gr.

11951–1951
Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Henderson green
ark · 1922
1 sentence

1925Counsel rely on our decision in Road Improvement District v. Henderson, 155 Ark. 482 , as sustaining their contention that the court had no power to continue for the purpose of awaiting the decision of the federal court.

11925–1925

Where else courts name it

CA 155 (1881–2026) TX 42 (1915–2025) IL 29 (1895–2025) NY 26 (1941–2025) PA 21 (1941–2023) OH 18 (1932–2026) FL 13 (1964–2024) MO 12 (1894–2019) AZ 11 (1973–2025) MS 11 (1904–2022) MI 11 (1891–2024) IN 9 (1875–2020) VT 8 (1990–2024) OR 8 (1959–2024) AL 8 (1988–2009) NJ 8 (1926–2008) CT 8 (1940–2020) DC 7 (1971–2026) HI 7 (1990–2021) VA 7 (1994–2026) CO 7 (1895–2026) GA 6 (1978–2008) RI 5 (1903–2011) NE 5 (1906–2013) MD 5 (1992–2013) ME 5 (1967–2002) LA 5 (1892–2007) AR 5 (1925–2017) UT 5 (2014–2026) TN 5 (1993–2023) KY 4 (1988–2023) NM 4 (1946–2012) WI 4 (1938–2026) KS 4 (1994–2014) AK 4 (1988–2024) SD 3 (1988–2022) MN 3 (1897–1989) IA 3 (1989–2022) ID 3 (1916–2011) OK 3 (1931–2003) WY 2 (1935–1989) NC 2 (1930–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check