Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People in Interest of AMDgreen2 sentences1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra ; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). 1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). | 2 | 2 |
In Re the Marriage of Bowlesgreen1 sentence2026See In re Marriage of Bowles, 916 P.2d 615, 617 (Colo. App. 1995). ¶ 10 Moreover, during the continued hearing, mother’s counsel asked mother why she was asking the court to order father to pay a portion of her fees. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People in Interest of C.L.I.
green
2 sentences1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra ; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). 1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). | 2 | 1985–1985 |
People in Interest of MCC
green
2 sentences1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra ; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). 1985See People in Interest of A.M.D., 648 P.2d 625 (Colo.1982); People in Interest of C.L.I., supra; People in Interest of M.C.C., 641 P.2d 306 (Colo.App.1982). | 2 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Arguello
green
1 sentence2020Id. (noting the importance of “adequately explaining to [the defendant] the potential consequences of his behavior” before imposing a forfeiture of a right based on such behavior). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Davis v. Washington
green
1 sentence2006Davis, 126 S.Ct. at 2278 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Lessee of Ewing v. Burnet
green
1 sentence1915But to be adverse it must be a pedis possessio, or an actual possession'.’ In Ewing v. Burnett, 11 Pet. 41, 53 , it was held that neither actual occupancy, nor cultivation, nor residence was necessary to constitute actual possession; that where the property is so situated as not to admit of any permanent useful improvements, and the continued claim of the party has been evidenced by public acts of ownership, such as he would exercise over property which he claimed in his own right, and would not exercise over property he did not claim, such possession will create a bar under the statute of lim | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.