case comes within rule (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

case comes within rule in Mississippi

10 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1877–1968 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Jones v. Richards green
miss · 1966
2 sentences

1968Appellant alleges that this case comes within the rule announced in Jones v. Richards, 254 Miss. 617 , 181 So.2d 923 (1966), wherein Mrs. Jones was a passenger in an automobile and was injured when the car collided with another vehicle.

1968Appellant alleges that this case comes within the rule announced in Jones v. Richards, 254 Miss. 617 , 181 So.2d 923 (1966), wherein Mrs. Jones was a passenger in an automobile and was injured when the car collided with another vehicle.

11968–1968
Crabb v. Wilkinson green
miss · 1947
2 sentences

1957This case comes within the rule announced in the case of Crabb, et al v. Wilkinson, et al, 202 Miss. 274 , 32 So. 2d 356 , where the Court quoted with approval 12 C.

1957This case comes within the rule announced in the case of Crabb, et al v. Wilkinson, et al, 202 Miss. 274 , 32 So. 2d 356 , where the Court quoted with approval 12 C.

11957–1957
Moore v. State green
· 1925
2 sentences

1929We think that upon the facts here involved the court below committed no error in adjudicating that probable cause for the search existed, and therefore that .the case comes within the rule announced in the case of Moore v. State, 138 Miss. 116 , 103 So. 483 , that “Belief by a police officer, based on information given him,by a credible person, that intoxicating' liquor is being transported in an automobile is sufficient probable cause to justify a search by him of the automobile without a warrant therefor under section 2, chapter 244, Laws of 1924.” The judgment of the court below will theref

1929We think that upon the facts here involved the court below committed no error in adjudicating that probable cause for the search existed, and therefore that .the case comes within the rule announced in the case of Moore v. State, 138 Miss. 116 , 103 So. 483 , that “Belief by a police officer, based on information given him,by a credible person, that intoxicating' liquor is being transported in an automobile is sufficient probable cause to justify a search by him of the automobile without a warrant therefor under section 2, chapter 244, Laws of 1924.” The judgment of the court below will theref

11929–1929
Falkner v. State green
miss · 1924
2 sentences

1926We think the case comes within the rule announced in Falkner v. State, 134 Miss. 253 , 98 So. 691 , which is supported by the Tucker case, 128 Miss. 211 , 90 So. 845 , 24 A. L.

1926We think the case comes within the rule announced in Falkner v. State, 134 Miss. 253 , 98 So. 691 , which is supported by the Tucker case, 128 Miss. 211 , 90 So. 845 , 24 A. L.

11926–1926
Tucker v. State green
miss · 1922
2 sentences

1926We think the case comes within the rule announced in Falkner v. State, 134 Miss. 253 , 98 So. 691 , which is supported by the Tucker case, 128 Miss. 211 , 90 So. 845 , 24 A. L.

1926We think the case comes within the rule announced in Falkner v. State, 134 Miss. 253 , 98 So. 691 , which is supported by the Tucker case, 128 Miss. 211 , 90 So. 845 , 24 A. L.

11926–1926
Scarver v. State green
miss · 1876
1 sentence

1922Appellant contends that this case comes within the principle announced in Scarver v. State, 53 Miss. 407 .

11922–1922
Scott v. State neutral
miss · 1902
1 sentence

1922This case comes within the rule announced in Scott v. State, 80 Miss. 197 , 31 So. 710 ; Watson v. State, 81 Miss. 700 , 33 So. 491 ; and Caldwell v. State, 85 Miss. 383 , 37 So. 816 .

11922–1922
Watson v. State neutral
miss · 1902
1 sentence

1922This case comes within the rule announced in Scott v. State, 80 Miss. 197 , 31 So. 710 ; Watson v. State, 81 Miss. 700 , 33 So. 491 ; and Caldwell v. State, 85 Miss. 383 , 37 So. 816 .

11922–1922
Caldwell v. State neutral
miss · 1904
1 sentence

1922This case comes within the rule announced in Scott v. State, 80 Miss. 197 , 31 So. 710 ; Watson v. State, 81 Miss. 700 , 33 So. 491 ; and Caldwell v. State, 85 Miss. 383 , 37 So. 816 .

11922–1922
City of Meridian v. Hudson neutral
· 1916
2 sentences

1920The only question before us on this appeal is whether this case comes within the rule announced in City of Meridian v. Hudson, 111 Miss. 339 , 71 So. 574 , which case was followed in Oliver v. City of Macon, 111 Miss. 349 , 71 So. 575 .

1920The only question before us on this appeal is whether this case comes within the rule announced in City of Meridian v. Hudson, 111 Miss. 339 , 71 So. 574 , which case was followed in Oliver v. City of Macon, 111 Miss. 349 , 71 So. 575 .

11920–1920
Oliver v. City of Macon neutral
· 1916
2 sentences

1920The only question before us on this appeal is whether this case comes within the rule announced in City of Meridian v. Hudson, 111 Miss. 339 , 71 So. 574 , which case was followed in Oliver v. City of Macon, 111 Miss. 349 , 71 So. 575 .

1920The only question before us on this appeal is whether this case comes within the rule announced in City of Meridian v. Hudson, 111 Miss. 339 , 71 So. 574 , which case was followed in Oliver v. City of Macon, 111 Miss. 349 , 71 So. 575 .

11920–1920
Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Ford neutral
miss · 1910
2 sentences

1916This case comes within the rule announced in Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Ford, 97 Miss. 198 , 52 So. 208 .

1916This case comes within the rule announced in Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Ford, 97 Miss. 198 , 52 So. 208 .

11916–1916
Echols v. State neutral
miss · 1915
1 sentence

1916This case comes within the rule announced in Echols v. State, 70 So. 694 .

11916–1916
Cocke v. Kuykendall neutral
· 1866
1 sentence

1877If, in suing out the writ, he acted on the statement of Morgan, and the jury so believed, the case comes within the principle of Cocke v. Kuy kendall, 41 Miss. 65 , and the verdict should be upheld.

11877–1877

Where else courts name it

NY 73 (1823–1976) TX 56 (1873–1975) CA 51 (1875–2021) IL 36 (1870–1994) OK 33 (1902–1966) MI 33 (1871–1975) MN 32 (1876–1957) IA 28 (1876–1988) MO 28 (1867–1995) MA 26 (1830–2003) PA 23 (1891–1979) GA 20 (1877–2012) KY 20 (1905–1977) OR 17 (1885–2005) KS 16 (1883–1940) WA 14 (1906–2012) AR 13 (1893–1985) LA 13 (1903–1982) NC 13 (1890–1976) MS 10 (1877–1968) WI 10 (1872–1979) NE 9 (1905–1959) OH 8 (1875–1932) SD 7 (1895–1936) FL 7 (1918–1969) NM 7 (1933–1965) TN 7 (1906–1983) UT 6 (1901–1926) SC 6 (1903–1936) IN 6 (1846–1963) CT 6 (1862–1983) VT 6 (1837–1923) CO 5 (1877–1931) NJ 5 (1924–1947) AL 5 (1892–1984) MT 4 (1894–1959) WV 4 (1950–1988) VA 4 (1917–1940) DC 3 (1891–2004) ID 3 (1909–1929) ND 3 (1923–1951) DE 3 (1911–1981) MD 3 (1923–1998) RI 2 (1949–1977)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check