Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1892–1984 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roe v. Wade
red
2 sentences1984The usual rule as stated by the majority is "that declaratory judgment proceedings will not lie for an anticipated controversy." However, the conflict presented in this case comes within the exception to the general rule for cases that are "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113 , 126 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 713 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Murphy v. Hunt , 455 U.S. 478 , 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 1183 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982). 1984The usual rule as stated by the majority is "that declaratory judgment proceedings will not lie for an anticipated controversy." However, the conflict presented in this case comes within the exception to the general rule for cases that are "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113 , 126 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 713 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Murphy v. Hunt , 455 U.S. 478 , 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 1183 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Murphy v. Hunt
green
2 sentences1984The usual rule as stated by the majority is "that declaratory judgment proceedings will not lie for an anticipated controversy." However, the conflict presented in this case comes within the exception to the general rule for cases that are "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113 , 126 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 713 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Murphy v. Hunt , 455 U.S. 478 , 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 1183 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982). 1984The usual rule as stated by the majority is "that declaratory judgment proceedings will not lie for an anticipated controversy." However, the conflict presented in this case comes within the exception to the general rule for cases that are "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade , 410 U.S. 113 , 126 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 713 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Murphy v. Hunt , 455 U.S. 478 , 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 1183 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Atlanta Mut. Ins. Co. v. Price
neutral
2 sentences1930Co. v. Price, 210 Ala. 334 , 97 So. 826 . 1930Co. v. Price, 210 Ala. 334 , 97 So. 826 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. Hackworth
green
2 sentences1920Defendant insists that this case comes within the rule laid down in the Hackworth Case, 200 Ala. 87 , 75 So. 463 . 1920Defendant insists that this case comes within the rule laid down in the Hackworth Case, 200 Ala. 87 , 75 So. 463 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. Allen
green
1 sentence1898Co. v. Allen, 99 Ala. 359 , (reaffirming Eureka Co. v. Bass, 81 Ala. 201 ); L. & N. R. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Phillips v. State
green
1 sentence1892In the ease of Phillips v. The State, 68 Ala. 469 , the juror claimed to be exempt from jury duty under the provisions of a special statute, and the trial court so held. | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Fariss v. State
neutral
1 sentence1892The case comes within the rule declared in Fariss v. State, 85 Ala. 1, and Maxwell v. State, 89 Ala. 150 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Maxwell v. State
green
1 sentence1892The case comes within the rule declared in Fariss v. State, 85 Ala. 1, and Maxwell v. State, 89 Ala. 150 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.