preferred claim (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

preferred claim in Ohio

10 Ohio opinions name it 4 courts 1905–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Speckman v. Speckmangreen
ohioctapp · 1954 · cited in 2 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
2 sentences

1990See, e.g., Speckman v. Speckman (App. 1954), 70 Ohio Law Abs. 506 , and Elford v. Elford (App. 1942), 36 Ohio Law Abs. 397 .

1990See, e.g., Clark v. Bayer (1877), 32 Ohio St. 299 , and Speckman v. Speckman (App.1954), 70 Ohio Law Abs. 506 , 128 N.E.2d 761 .

22
State v. Phillips, Unpublished Decision (9-3-2004)green
ohioctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026The client’s preferred defense strategies do not necessarily govern his counsel’s decisions.” State v. Phillips, 2004-Ohio-4688, ¶ 41 (2d Dist.).

2026The client’s preferred defense strategies do not necessarily govern his counsel’s decisions.” State v. Phillips, 2004-Ohio-4688, ¶ 41 (2d Dist.).

11
Elford v. Elfordgreen
ohioctapp · 1942 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990See, e.g., Speckman v. Speckman (App. 1954), 70 Ohio Law Abs. 506 , and Elford v. Elford (App. 1942), 36 Ohio Law Abs. 397 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Bickham v. Bickham neutral
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2019The Tenth District Court then determined that because “cohabitation has been established pursuant to the Moell factors in the instant case, any citation in the court below to McGlothan was harmless error.” Id. at ¶ 54. {¶36} Accordingly, we find McGlothan does not supply the preferred test in Ohio to determine “cohabitation” for questions of termination of spousal support, and we reject appellant’s proposition that this Court, in Bickham v. Bickham, supra, “adopted” the Delaware County, Case No. 18 CAF 07 0052 12 definition of that term from the domestic violence context for utilization in spo

12019–2019
McDonald v. McDonald neutral
ohioctapp · 1936
1 sentence

1952McDonald v. McDonald, 20 Abs 421 (1936).

11952–1952
Division of Aid v. Hogan green
· 1944
1 sentence

1951Division of Aid for Aged v. Hogan, Admr., 143 Ohio St., 186 , 54 N. E. (2d), 781.

11951–1951
Scobey v. Fair, Admr. neutral
ohioctapp · 1942
1 sentence

1943The case of Scobey v. Fair, Admr., 70 Ohio App., 51 , 45 N. E. (2d), 139, upon which appellant relies’to secure a reversal of the judgment of the trial court, is distinguished from the case at bar by the fact that amended Section 1359-7, General Code, construed there was not in effect when deceased died five days before its effective date.

11943–1943
Johnson v. Farmers Bank neutral
moctapp · 1928
2 sentences

1936Conceding that there was a divergence of judicial authority upon the legal question involved, the Court *441 of Appeals rested its decision upon decisions of the Missouri courts, and notably upon the case of Johnson v. Farmers Bank of Clarksdale, 223 Mo. App., 513 , 11 S. W. (2d), 1090 .

1936Conceding that there was a divergence of judicial authority upon the legal question involved, the Court *441 of Appeals rested its decision upon decisions of the Missouri courts, and notably upon the case of Johnson v. Farmers Bank of Clarksdale, 223 Mo. App., 513 , 11 S. W. (2d), 1090 .

11936–1936
Lamb v. Fulton, Supt. of Banks neutral
ohioctapp · 1932
1 sentence

1933We have had before us the case of Chase v Fulton, which involved a deposit by an administrator, and Lamb v Fulton, which involved a deposit by a testamentary trustee, and both of these cases are discussed in the ease of Lamb v Fulton, 44 Oh Ap, 366, ( 13 Abs 560 ).

11933–1933
City Bank of Hopkinsville v. Blackmore neutral
ca6 · 1896
1 sentence

1905All the cases referred to by the counsel for complainant are consistent with this -distinction, and the case of Bank v. Blackmore, 21 C.

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

IL 36 (1892–2024) PA 28 (1893–2008) KS 27 (1922–2022) NY 26 (1892–1992) CA 23 (1898–2015) IA 22 (1893–2023) IN 21 (1882–2005) MO 16 (1898–1986) NE 12 (1894–2008) FL 11 (1928–1992) TX 11 (1874–2015) CO 11 (1896–2019) MT 10 (1925–1979) OH 10 (1905–2026) MN 9 (1925–2024) AR 8 (1925–2014) MD 8 (1907–2015) NJ 8 (1918–2025) OK 7 (1906–1966) SD 7 (1926–1998) AZ 7 (1932–2019) MA 7 (1935–2017) AL 7 (1933–1959) VA 6 (1934–2013) ND 6 (1913–2003) TN 6 (1895–1980) OR 6 (1899–1984) WA 5 (1916–2024) GA 5 (1935–2022) LA 4 (1931–2001) MI 4 (1931–2023) WI 3 (1934–1936) HI 3 (2005–2025) NM 3 (1924–2005) NC 3 (1950–1986) NV 2 (1952–2007) UT 2 (1962–2025) WV 2 (1935–2023) SC 2 (1932–1938) KY 2 (1918–1930) CT 2 (1900–1984) ID 2 (1897–1927) WY 2 (1934–1936)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check