Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1913–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shuck Ex Rel. Shuck v. Shuckgreen2 sentences2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). 2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). | 3 | 3 |
Dennison v. North Dakota Department of Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2003See Dennison , 2002 ND 39, ¶ 16 , 640 N.W.2d 447 . 2003See Dennison , 2002 ND 39, ¶ 16 , 640 N.W.2d 447 . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Whitver
green
2 sentences2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). 2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). | 3 | 2002–2003 |
State v. Wehe
neutral
2 sentences2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). 2003See also Shuck v. Shuck , 77 N.D. 628 , 44 N.W.2d 767 (1950); State v. Wehe , 72 N.D. 186 , 5 N.W.2d 311 (1942); State v. Whitver , 71 N.D. 664 , 3 N.W.2d 457 (1942). | 3 | 2002–2003 |
Department of Social Welfare of State of California v. Stauffer
green
2 sentences1960Department of Social Welfare of State of California v. Stauffer, 56 Cal.App.2d 699 , 133 P.2d 692, 693 , involved an action to recover from the estate of a deceased recipient of old age security payments, who possessed property or income in excess of the amount allowed by law and thus was not entitled to receive such payments under a statute providing that: “ ‘If, on the death of a recipient of aid under this chapter, it is found that he was possessed of property or income in excess of the amount allowed under the provisions of this chapter and that he has not disclosed the same to the board o 1960Department of Social Welfare of State of California v. Stauffer, 56 Cal.App.2d 699 , 133 P.2d 692, 693 , involved an action to recover from the estate of a deceased recipient of old age security payments, who possessed property or income in excess of the amount allowed by law and thus was not entitled to receive such payments under a statute providing that: “ ‘If, on the death of a recipient of aid under this chapter, it is found that he was possessed of property or income in excess of the amount allowed under the provisions of this chapter and that he has not disclosed the same to the board o | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Cooper v. Marsh
neutral
1 sentence1934The plaintiff’s right to exemptions as a widow “is not in the nature of an interest in the property, but is a preferred claim against the estate of the decedent which may or may not be available to claimant according to the circumstances.” Fisher v. Fisher, 53 N. D. 631, 635 , 207 N. W. 403 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Fisher v. Fisher
neutral
1 sentence1934The plaintiff’s right to exemptions as a widow “is not in the nature of an interest in the property, but is a preferred claim against the estate of the decedent which may or may not be available to claimant according to the circumstances.” Fisher v. Fisher, 53 N. D. 631, 635 , 207 N. W. 403 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Grand District Lodge of District No. 41 of the Grand United Order of Odd Fellows in America v. Víctor Rojas Lodge, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1913In the case of Parks v. Soldiers’ & Sailors’ Home Comrs. 22 Colo. 86 , 48 Pac. 542 , it was. held that “every officer of this state who holds his position by election, or appointment, . . . and whose duties are defined by statute, and are in their nature continuous and relate to the administration of the affairs of the state government, and whose salary is paid out of the public funds, is a public officer of either the legislative, executive, or judicial department of the government,” and that his salary is therefore a preferred claim against the state. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Parks v. Commissioners of Soldiers' & Sailors' Home
green
1 sentence1913In the case of Parks v. Soldiers’ & Sailors’ Home Comrs. 22 Colo. 86 , 48 Pac. 542 , it was. held that “every officer of this state who holds his position by election, or appointment, . . . and whose duties are defined by statute, and are in their nature continuous and relate to the administration of the affairs of the state government, and whose salary is paid out of the public funds, is a public officer of either the legislative, executive, or judicial department of the government,” and that his salary is therefore a preferred claim against the state. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.