9 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1938–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.green2 sentences2001See FTC v. Flotil [Flotill] Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967), cited in Mad Butcher, supra, 4 Ark. 1995See FTC v. Flotil Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967), cited in Mad Butcher, supra, 4 Ark. | 3 | 3 |
Mad Butcher, Inc. v. Parkergreen2 sentences2001See FTC v. Flotil [Flotill] Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967), cited in Mad Butcher, supra, 4 Ark. 1995See FTC v. Flotil Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967), cited in Mad Butcher, supra, 4 Ark. | 2 | 2 |
City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.green1 sentence1999See, e.g. , City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 51 Cal.App.4 th 1410, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 852 (1997) (at common law, when a public utility accepts franchise rights in public streets it assumes an implied obligation to pay for relocation of its facilities when necessary to make way for a proper governmental use); Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Dame Construction Company, Inc., 191 Cal.App.3d 233 , 236 Cal. Rptr.351 (1987) (according to the common law rule, in the absence of a provision to the contrary, a public utility's franchise rights in a public street are subject to an im | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Farr v. American National Property & Casualty Co.
neutral
1 sentence2015Farr v. American National Property & Casualty Co., 2015 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pine Belt Chevrolet, Inc. v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
green
2 sentences1999See, e.g. , City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 51 Cal.App.4 th 1410, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 852 (1997) (at common law, when a public utility accepts franchise rights in public streets it assumes an implied obligation to pay for relocation of its facilities when necessary to make way for a proper governmental use); Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Dame Construction Company, Inc., 191 Cal.App.3d 233 , 236 Cal. Rptr.351 (1987) (according to the common law rule, in the absence of a provision to the contrary, a public utility's franchise rights in a public street are subject to an im 1999See, e.g. , City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 51 Cal.App.4 th 1410, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 852 (1997) (at common law, when a public utility accepts franchise rights in public streets it assumes an implied obligation to pay for relocation of its facilities when necessary to make way for a proper governmental use); Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Dame Construction Company, Inc., 191 Cal.App.3d 233 , 236 Cal. Rptr.351 (1987) (according to the common law rule, in the absence of a provision to the contrary, a public utility's franchise rights in a public street are subject to an im | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Fayetteville
neutral
2 sentences1999The most recent discussion of the issue in Arkansas is embodied in Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. City of Fayetteville, 271 Ark. 630 , 609 S.W.2d 914 (1980). 1999The most recent discussion of the issue in Arkansas is embodied in Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. City of Fayetteville, 271 Ark. 630 , 609 S.W.2d 914 (1980). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Damé Construction Co.
neutral
1 sentence1999See, e.g. , City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 51 Cal.App.4 th 1410, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 852 (1997) (at common law, when a public utility accepts franchise rights in public streets it assumes an implied obligation to pay for relocation of its facilities when necessary to make way for a proper governmental use); Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Dame Construction Company, Inc., 191 Cal.App.3d 233 , 236 Cal. Rptr.351 (1987) (according to the common law rule, in the absence of a provision to the contrary, a public utility's franchise rights in a public street are subject to an im | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Superior Iron Works v. McMillan
green
2 sentences1989In recognition of this principle, our supreme court ruled in Superior Iron Works v. McMillan, 235 Ark. 207 , 357 S.W.2d 524 (1962) that one who purchases from a thief acquires no title as against the true owner absent exigent circumstances. 1989In recognition of this principle, our supreme court ruled in Superior Iron Works v. McMillan, 235 Ark. 207 , 357 S.W.2d 524 (1962) that one who purchases from a thief acquires no title as against the true owner absent exigent circumstances. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Equity Investors, Inc. v. Ammest Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence1987See F.T.C. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967); Equity Investors, Inc. v. Amvest [Ammest] Group, Inc., 1 Kan. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bonner v. Surman
neutral
2 sentences1961“The general common law rule is that a parent is not liable of a minor child’s tort unless there is some element of participation,” Bonner v. Surman, 215 Ark. 301 , 220 S. W. 2d 431 . 1961“The general common law rule is that a parent is not liable of a minor child’s tort unless there is some element of participation,” Bonner v. Surman, 215 Ark. 301 , 220 S. W. 2d 431 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
McCarthy v. Heiselman
neutral
1 sentence1949McCarthy v. Heiselman, 140 App. Div. 240 , 125 N. Y. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Whittaker v. Holmes
neutral
2 sentences1938This exception to the general common-law rule is recognized in the cases of Buerger v. Boyd, 25 Ark. 441 , and Whittaker v. Holmes, 165 Ark. 1 , 263 S. W. 788 . 1938This exception to the general common-law rule is recognized in the cases of Buerger v. Boyd, 25 Ark. 441 , and Whittaker v. Holmes, 165 Ark. 1 , 263 S. W. 788 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Buerger v. Boyd
neutral
1 sentence1938This exception to the general common-law rule is recognized in the cases of Buerger v. Boyd, 25 Ark. 441 , and Whittaker v. Holmes, 165 Ark. 1 , 263 S. W. 788 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.