Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wideman v. Stategreen2 sentences1986See, e.g., Wideman v. State, 269 Ala. 49 , 110 So.2d 298 (1959); Taylor v. State, 47 Ala.App. 285 , 253 So.2d 354 (1971)...." See also Driskill v. State, 376 So.2d 678 (Ala.1979) (an adjudication of delinquency must be reversed if there is a material variance between the allegations of the delinquency petition and the proof introduced at trial). 1986See, e.g., Wideman v. State, 269 Ala. 49 , 110 So.2d 298 (1959); Taylor v. State, 47 Ala.App. 285 , 253 So.2d 354 (1971)...." See also Driskill v. State, 376 So.2d 678 (Ala.1979) (an adjudication of delinquency must be reversed if there is a material variance between the allegations of the delinquency petition and the proof introduced at trial). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte City of Huntsville Hospital Bd.
green
2 sentences2018Bd. , 366 So.2d 684 , 686 (Ala. 1978). 2018Bd. , 366 So.2d 684 , 686 (Ala. 1978). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Taylor v. State
neutral
2 sentences1986See, e.g., Wideman v. State, 269 Ala. 49 , 110 So.2d 298 (1959); Taylor v. State, 47 Ala.App. 285 , 253 So.2d 354 (1971)...." See also Driskill v. State, 376 So.2d 678 (Ala.1979) (an adjudication of delinquency must be reversed if there is a material variance between the allegations of the delinquency petition and the proof introduced at trial). 1986See, e.g., Wideman v. State, 269 Ala. 49 , 110 So.2d 298 (1959); Taylor v. State, 47 Ala.App. 285 , 253 So.2d 354 (1971)...." See also Driskill v. State, 376 So.2d 678 (Ala.1979) (an adjudication of delinquency must be reversed if there is a material variance between the allegations of the delinquency petition and the proof introduced at trial). | 2 | 1979–1986 |
Derico v. Duncan
green
1 sentence1995Therefore, in Derico v. Duncan, 410 So.2d 27 (Ala.1982), this Court applied in a Mini-Code case the general common law rule that contracts made in derogation of a regulatory licensing statute are void and, thus, unenforceable. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
White v. Chelsea Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence1987Courts faced with claims similar to that in the instant case in which employees contended that a handbook rose to the level of a contract of employment support our conclusion and have held that the handbook does not vary the general common law rule that an employee is terminable at will...." 425 So.2d at 1090 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Driskill v. State
green
1 sentence1986See, e.g., Wideman v. State, 269 Ala. 49 , 110 So.2d 298 (1959); Taylor v. State, 47 Ala.App. 285 , 253 So.2d 354 (1971)...." See also Driskill v. State, 376 So.2d 678 (Ala.1979) (an adjudication of delinquency must be reversed if there is a material variance between the allegations of the delinquency petition and the proof introduced at trial). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
WHITE DAIRY COMPANY v. Davidson
green
2 sentences1986White Dairy Co. v. Davidson , 283 Ala. 63 , 214 So.2d 416 (1968). 1986White Dairy Co. v. Davidson , 283 Ala. 63 , 214 So.2d 416 (1968). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hill v. Rice
green
2 sentences1986This exception is subject to the general common law rule that contracts restraining employment are looked upon with disfavor, Hill v. Rice , 259 Ala. 587 , 67 So.2d 789 (1953), and are subject to a test of reasonableness. 1986This exception is subject to the general common law rule that contracts restraining employment are looked upon with disfavor, Hill v. Rice , 259 Ala. 587 , 67 So.2d 789 (1953), and are subject to a test of reasonableness. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
green
1 sentence1968Co., 7 Cir., 333 F.2d 705 , the court said: “The general common law rule of damages in cases of unreasonable delay and damage to goods in shipment is the difference in the market value of the goods at the date and in the condition they were contracted to arrive at their destination and the date on and the condition in which they actually arrived. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.