9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Karnes Enterprises, Inc. v. Quangreen1 sentence2020See Quan, 221 Kan. at 601 (actions for specific performance equitable in nature). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.
green
2 sentences2019Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 Kan. 942, 960 , 327 P.3d 430 (2014) (quoting Haz-Mat Response, Inc., 259 Kan. 166 , Syl. ¶ 5). 2014Nelson v. Nelson, 288 Kan. 570, 580 , 205 P.3d 715 (2009); Haz-Mat Response, Inc., 259 Kan. 166 , Syl. ¶ 6. | 3 | 2014–2019 |
Nelson v. Nelson
green
2 sentences2024Nelson v. Nelson, 288 Kan. 570, 580 , 205 P.3d 715 (2009). 2024Nelson v. Nelson, 288 Kan. 570, 580 , 205 P.3d 715 (2009). | 2 | 2014–2024 |
Marion Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corporation Disability Income Plan
green
2 sentences2010In support of Robinson’s argument, she cites Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Disability, 341 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2003), which is representative of one line of cases. 2010In support of Robinson's argument, she cites Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Disability, 341 F.3d 696 (8th Cir.2003), which is representative of one line of cases. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
University of Kansas Hospital Authority v. Board of Commissioners
green
2 sentences2019Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 Kan. 942, 960 , 327 P.3d 430 (2014) (quoting Haz-Mat Response, Inc., 259 Kan. 166 , Syl. ¶ 5). 2019Auth. v. Board of Wabaunsee County Comm'rs, 299 Kan. 942, 960 , 327 P.3d 430 (2014) (quoting Haz-Mat Response, Inc., 259 Kan. 166 , Syl. ¶ 5). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Security Benefit Life Insurance v. Fleming Companies, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998App. 2d 833 , 908 P.2d 1315 (1995), rev. denied 259 Kan. 928 (1996), this court evaluated an unjust enrichment claim. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
J. W. Thompson Co. v. Welles Products Corp.
green
1 sentence1996Thompson, 243 Kan. at 512 : “There simply are no special circumstances to justify its [unjust enrichment] application.” Both cases cited with approval the annotation in 62 A.L.R.3d 288 , entitled “Subcontractor s Recovery Against Owner.” We may conclude from our past decisions and from a close examination of this annotation that the circumstances under which an unjust enrichment claim may be brought by a subcontractor against an owner, absent privity, are indeed limited. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.
green
1 sentence1996Haz-Mat Response, Inc., v. Certified Waste Services, Ltd., 21 Kan. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.