unjust enrichment claim (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

unjust enrichment claim in Nebraska

9 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2024 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Kanne v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.green
neb · 2006 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015See Kanne v. Visa U.S.A., 272 Neb. 489 , 723 N.W.2d 293 (2006).

2015See Kanne v. Visa U.S.A., 272 Neb. 489 , 723 N.W.2d 293 (2006).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
D&M Roofing & Siding v. Distribution, Inc. green
neb · 2024
1 sentence

2024Cite as 316 Neb. 952 the unjust enrichment claim and denying the necessary ele- ment of damages in its breach of contract action, the breach of contract action remained pending because the district court did not grant or deny relief.

12024–2024
Abc Electric, Inc., - Appellee/ Cross v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd., - Appellant/ Cross green
ca8 · 2001
1 sentence

2024In its brief on appeal, Dolton Electric directs out attention to ABC Elec., Inc. v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd., 249 F.3d 762 (8th Cir. 2001).

12024–2024
Schaeffer v. Frakes green
neb · 2023
2 sentences

2023Rather, they dispute only whether the quiet title suit and Boone River’s present claim for unjust enrichment involved the same “cause of action.” See Schaeffer, 313 Neb. at 346 , 984 N.W.2d at 298 .

2023Rather, they dispute only whether the quiet title suit and Boone River’s present claim for unjust enrichment involved the same “cause of action.” See Schaeffer, 313 Neb. at 346 , 984 N.W.2d at 298 .

12023–2023
In Re Estate of Soule green
neb · 1995
2 sentences

2022Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not commit plain error in granting summary judgment in favor of Barbara on Smith’s counterclaim. 28 Diamond v. State, 302 Neb. 892 , 926 N.W.2d 71 (2019). 29 In re Estate of Soule, 248 Neb. 878 , 540 N.W.2d 118 (1995). 30 Great Northern Ins.

2022Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not commit plain error in granting summary judgment in favor of Barbara on Smith’s counterclaim. 28 Diamond v. State, 302 Neb. 892 , 926 N.W.2d 71 (2019). 29 In re Estate of Soule, 248 Neb. 878 , 540 N.W.2d 118 (1995). 30 Great Northern Ins.

12022–2022
Diamond v. Department of Insurance green
neb · 2019
2 sentences

2022Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not commit plain error in granting summary judgment in favor of Barbara on Smith’s counterclaim. 28 Diamond v. State, 302 Neb. 892 , 926 N.W.2d 71 (2019). 29 In re Estate of Soule, 248 Neb. 878 , 540 N.W.2d 118 (1995). 30 Great Northern Ins.

2022Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not commit plain error in granting summary judgment in favor of Barbara on Smith’s counterclaim. 28 Diamond v. State, 302 Neb. 892 , 926 N.W.2d 71 (2019). 29 In re Estate of Soule, 248 Neb. 878 , 540 N.W.2d 118 (1995). 30 Great Northern Ins.

12022–2022
John Franklin Trickett v. John Spann and Sally Spann green
arkctapp · 2020
1 sentence

2022The district court relied heavily upon an opinion of the Arkansas Court of Appeals, Trickett v. Spann, 2020 Ark.

12022–2022
Aurora Technology v. Labedz green
nebctapp · 2021
1 sentence

2021We therefore do not address the unjust enrichment claim. - 42 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 30 Nebraska Appellate Reports AURORA TECHNOLOGY v. LABEDZ Cite as 30 Neb.

12021–2021
Washa v. Miller green
neb · 1996
2 sentences

2020Washa v. Miller, 249 Neb. 941 , 546 N.W.2d 813 (1996).

2020Washa v. Miller, 249 Neb. 941 , 546 N.W.2d 813 (1996).

12020–2020
Walker v. Probandt green
nebctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2017We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant a default judgment on the unjust enrichment claim, but that it should have granted a default judgment against Probandt on the - 37 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 25 Nebraska A ppellate R eports WALKER v. PROBANDT Cite as 25 Neb.

12017–2017

Where else courts name it

NY 265 (1942–2026) OH 143 (1986–2026) DE 101 (2001–2026) TX 76 (1991–2026) IL 75 (1957–2026) PA 69 (1956–2026) MI 65 (1975–2026) CT 61 (1968–2026) NC 53 (1952–2026) WA 53 (1941–2026) ME 49 (1974–2024) CA 46 (1950–2026) WI 44 (1975–2026) CO 42 (1989–2026) LA 39 (1965–2023) VT 36 (1914–2026) MD 35 (1958–2025) FL 34 (1953–2025) AZ 33 (1989–2026) UT 31 (1999–2025) MO 30 (1998–2023) MN 29 (1989–2026) TN 29 (1975–2026) GA 28 (1987–2026) NJ 27 (1984–2026) ID 23 (1984–2026) OR 23 (1977–2025) AL 22 (2000–2025) AR 21 (1955–2023) MT 19 (1967–2024) NM 19 (1990–2024) IA 18 (1939–2025) ND 16 (1974–2026) MA 14 (2010–2026) WY 14 (1989–2026) NV 12 (2014–2022) OK 10 (1935–2024) IN 10 (1971–2026) RI 10 (1969–2016) KS 9 (1996–2024) NE 9 (2015–2024) DC 8 (2005–2025) SC 7 (2002–2025) MS 7 (1998–2013) VA 7 (1992–2024) KY 7 (1929–2023) WV 6 (1988–2020) NH 6 (1982–2018) SD 5 (1991–2025) HI 4 (2013–2025) VI 3 (2013–2014) AK 2 (1996–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check