Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jacoby v. Jacobygreen2 sentences2022Jacoby v. Jacoby, 2004 WY 140, ¶ 12 , 100 P.3d 852, 856 (Wyo. 2004); see also Nuhome Invs., LLC v. Weller, 2003 WY 171, ¶ 22 , 81 P.3d 940, 948 (Wyo. 2003); Elec. 2022Jacoby v. Jacoby, 2004 WY 140, ¶ 12 , 100 P.3d 852, 856 (Wyo. 2004); see also Nuhome Invs., LLC v. Weller, 2003 WY 171, ¶ 22 , 81 P.3d 940, 948 (Wyo. 2003); Elec. | 2 | 2 |
Pancratz Co. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc.green2 sentences1998Without such payment, the party would be unjustly enriched.” Pancratz Company, Inc. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc., 720 P.2d 906, 908 (Wyo.1986) (quoting Montes v. Naismith and Trevino Construction Company, 459 S.W.2d 691, 694 (Tex.Ct.App.1970)). 1989Pancratz Company, Inc. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc., 720 P.2d 906, 908-09 (Wyo.1986). | 2 | 2 |
Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.green2 sentences2022Id. (quoting Bowles, 847 P.2d at 1004 ). 4 [¶14] The fourth element of an unjust enrichment claim includes two separate requirements. 2022Id. (quoting Bowles, 847 P.2d at 1004 ). 4 [¶14] The fourth element of an unjust enrichment claim includes two separate requirements. | 1 | 2 |
Samuel Robinson and Kari L. Winfield v. Vernon Blackgreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., Robinson, ¶ 13, 564 P.3d at 1036 (discussing how the defendant had a history of paying plaintiff for the work she performed on defendant’s ranch). 2026See, e.g., Robinson, ¶ 13, 564 P.3d at 1036 (discussing how the defendant had a history of paying plaintiff for the work she performed on defendant’s ranch). | 1 | 1 |
Delores M. Statzer v. Lonnie D. Statzergreen2 sentences2026Statzer, ¶¶ 14-15, 517 P.3d at 579-80. 2026Statzer, ¶¶ 14-15, 517 P.3d at 579-80 . | 1 | 1 |
Nuhome Investments, LLC v. Wellergreen2 sentences2022Jacoby v. Jacoby, 2004 WY 140, ¶ 12 , 100 P.3d 852, 856 (Wyo. 2004); see also Nuhome Invs., LLC v. Weller, 2003 WY 171, ¶ 22 , 81 P.3d 940, 948 (Wyo. 2003); Elec. 2022Jacoby v. Jacoby, 2004 WY 140, ¶ 12 , 100 P.3d 852, 856 (Wyo. 2004); see also Nuhome Invs., LLC v. Weller, 2003 WY 171, ¶ 22 , 81 P.3d 940, 948 (Wyo. 2003); Elec. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Krohngreen2 sentences2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 | 1 | 1 |
Silver Dollar Motel, Inc. v. Taylor Electric Co.green1 sentence2003See Silver Dollar Motel, Inc. v. Taylor Elec Co., 761 P.2d 1006, 1009 (Wyo.1988). | 1 | 1 |
World Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Amerus Bankgreen2 sentences2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 | 1 | 1 |
Adkins v. Lawsongreen1 sentence2002Therefore, we will address the unjust enrichment claim as it was filed and presented to the district court, that being a claim for the loss of the good will of the business. [136] We set forth the elements of an unjust enrichment claim in Adkins v. Lawson, 892 P.2d 128, 131 (Wyo.1995), by holding that a party who is seeking damages on the basis of unjust enrichment must prove four elements: (1) Valuable services were rendered, or materials furnished, (2) to the party to be charged, (8) which services or materials were accepted, used and enjoyed by the party, and, (4) under such cireumstances w | 1 | 1 |
Eisele v. Ricegreen1 sentence1998Eisele v. Rice, 948 P.2d 1360, 1364 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Montes v. Naismith and Trevino Construction Co.green1 sentence1998Without such payment, the party would be unjustly enriched.” Pancratz Company, Inc. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc., 720 P.2d 906, 908 (Wyo.1986) (quoting Montes v. Naismith and Trevino Construction Company, 459 S.W.2d 691, 694 (Tex.Ct.App.1970)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc.green1 sentence1993State v. BHP Petroleum Co., 804 P.2d 671, 673 (Wyo.1991). | 1 | 1 |
O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc.green1 sentence1991See also Independent Producers Marketing Corp. v. Cobb, 721 P.2d 1106 (Wyo. 1986). [2] The State demanded seven percent interest per annum for the period of time prior to June 1, 1982, on the basis of our decisions in O's Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673 (Wyo. 1988), and Rissler & McMurry Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 559 P.2d 25 (Wyo. 1977). [3] The doctrine of unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit, provides for recovery of damages on a contract implied in equity." Johnson v. Anderson, 768 P.2d 18, 25 (Wyo. 1989). [4] The Rissler & McMur | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Andersongreen2 sentences1991See also Independent Producers Marketing Corp. v. Cobb, 721 P.2d 1106 (Wyo. 1986). [2] The State demanded seven percent interest per annum for the period of time prior to June 1, 1982, on the basis of our decisions in O's Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673 (Wyo. 1988), and Rissler & McMurry Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 559 P.2d 25 (Wyo. 1977). [3] The doctrine of unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit, provides for recovery of damages on a contract implied in equity." Johnson v. Anderson, 768 P.2d 18, 25 (Wyo. 1989). [4] The Rissler & McMur 1991"The doctrine of unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit, provides for recovery of damages on a contract implied in equity.” Johnson v. Anderson, 768 P.2d 18, 25 (Wyo.1989). . | 1 | 1 |
Independent Producers Marketing Corp. v. Cobbgreen1 sentence1991See also Independent Producers Marketing Corp. v. Cobb, 721 P.2d 1106 (Wyo. 1986). [2] The State demanded seven percent interest per annum for the period of time prior to June 1, 1982, on the basis of our decisions in O's Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673 (Wyo. 1988), and Rissler & McMurry Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 559 P.2d 25 (Wyo. 1977). [3] The doctrine of unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit, provides for recovery of damages on a contract implied in equity." Johnson v. Anderson, 768 P.2d 18, 25 (Wyo. 1989). [4] The Rissler & McMur | 1 | 1 |
Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.green2 sentences1991The State principally relies upon the unjust enrichment analysis utilized in Rissler & McMurry Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 559 P.2d 25 (Wyo. 1977). 1991See also Independent Producers Marketing Corp. v. Cobb, 721 P.2d 1106 (Wyo. 1986). [2] The State demanded seven percent interest per annum for the period of time prior to June 1, 1982, on the basis of our decisions in O's Gold Seed Company v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc., 761 P.2d 673 (Wyo. 1988), and Rissler & McMurry Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 559 P.2d 25 (Wyo. 1977). [3] The doctrine of unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit, provides for recovery of damages on a contract implied in equity." Johnson v. Anderson, 768 P.2d 18, 25 (Wyo. 1989). [4] The Rissler & McMur | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Redland v. Redland
green
2 sentences2022Redland, ¶ 146, 288 P.3d at 1205–06 (quoting Jacoby, ¶ 13, 100 P.3d at 856 ). 2022Wholesale Supply Co., 2015 WY 105, ¶ 29 , 356 P.3d at 261–62; Redland, 2012 WY 148, ¶ 138 , 288 P.3d at 1203 ; Roussalis, 979 P.2d at 496 . [¶51] To succeed on her unjust enrichment claim, Ms. Eaton was required to show that the Estate would be unjustly enriched if it did not pay her for the services she rendered to Mr. Iversen. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLC
green
1 sentence2024We need not decide, however, whether Summit established those elements because we cannot find that the district court abused its discretion when it concluded Summit had failed to prove its damages. [¶26] In general, “a plaintiff has the burden of producing evidence to prove his damages to a reasonable degree of certainty.” Gill, ¶ 34, 512 P.3d at 981 (citing Mantle, ¶ 78, 437 P.3d at 786 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Roussalis v. Apollo Electric Co.
green
1 sentence2022Wholesale Supply Co., 2015 WY 105, ¶ 29 , 356 P.3d at 261–62; Redland, 2012 WY 148, ¶ 138 , 288 P.3d at 1203 ; Roussalis, 979 P.2d at 496 . [¶51] To succeed on her unjust enrichment claim, Ms. Eaton was required to show that the Estate would be unjustly enriched if it did not pay her for the services she rendered to Mr. Iversen. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Electrical Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. v. Alane Fraser and M.J. Bishop Concrete & Construction, Inc.
green
2 sentences2022Wholesale Supply Co., 2015 WY 105, ¶ 29 , 356 P.3d at 261–62; Redland, 2012 WY 148, ¶ 138 , 288 P.3d at 1203 ; Roussalis, 979 P.2d at 496 . [¶51] To succeed on her unjust enrichment claim, Ms. Eaton was required to show that the Estate would be unjustly enriched if it did not pay her for the services she rendered to Mr. Iversen. 2022Wholesale Supply Co., 2015 WY 105, ¶ 29 , 356 P.3d at 261–62; Redland, 2012 WY 148, ¶ 138 , 288 P.3d at 1203 ; Roussalis, 979 P.2d at 496 . [¶51] To succeed on her unjust enrichment claim, Ms. Eaton was required to show that the Estate would be unjustly enriched if it did not pay her for the services she rendered to Mr. Iversen. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Robinson v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2004Ms. Jacoby "expected to be paid" for her efforts in building the home by being allowed to live in the home. [¶ 26] In Robinson v. Robinson, 100 Ill.App.3d 437 , 57 Ill.Dec. 532 , 429 N.E.2d 183 (1981), the court affirmed imposition of an equitable lien in a case brought by a woman against her former parents-in-law to establish her interest in property belonging to them to which she voluntarily and without their consent made substantial improvements. 2004Ms. Jacoby "expected to be paid" for her efforts in building the home by being allowed to live in the home. [¶ 26] In Robinson v. Robinson, 100 Ill.App.3d 437 , 57 Ill.Dec. 532 , 429 N.E.2d 183 (1981), the court affirmed imposition of an equitable lien in a case brought by a woman against her former parents-in-law to establish her interest in property belonging to them to which she voluntarily and without their consent made substantial improvements. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation
green
2 sentences2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 2003“There is no requirement that foreclosed property be sold for its appraised value, which may or may not reflect the price that could be obtained upon sale of the property.” World Savings and Loan Association v. Amerus Bank, 317 Ill.App.3d 772 , 251 Ill.Dec. 385 , 740 N.E.2d 466, 474 (2000). “ ‘[F]air market value’ presumes market conditions that, by definition, simply do not obtain in the context of a forced sale.” BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 511 U.S. 531, 538 , 114 S.Ct. 1757 , 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994); see also Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd., 203 Ariz. 205 , 52 P.3d 774, 780 (20 | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Zitterkopf v. Bradbury
green
2 sentences1991In Zitterkopf v. Bradbury, 783 P.2d 1142 (Wyo. 1989), we reiterated that our standard of review in the unjust enrichment/quantum meruit cases places the burden of proof upon the party asserting that theory. 1991In Zitterkopf v. Bradbury, 783 P.2d 1142 (Wyo.1989), we reiterated that our standard of review in the unjust enrichment/quantum meruit cases places the burden of proof upon the party asserting that theory. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.