Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Busick v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Busick v. State, 906 So.2d 846, 861 (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (“For the presumption to arise, the evidence must establish a reasonable likelihood of vindictiveness.”). 2011See Busick v. State, 906 So. 2d 846, 861 (Miss. | 2 | 2 |
Russell v. Stategreen2 sentences2013“The doctrine of prosecutorial vindictiveness ‘precludes action by a prosecutor that is designed to penalize a defendant for invoking any legally protected right available to a defendant during a criminal prosecution.’” Russell v. State, 79 So.3d 529, 539 (Miss.Ct.App.2011) (quoting Garlotte v. State, 915 So.2d 460, 467 (Miss.Ct.App.2005)). 2011“The doctrine of prosecutorial vindictiveness ‘precludes action by a prosecutor that is designed to penalize a defendant for invoking any legally protected right available to a defendant during a criminal prosecution.’” Russell v. State, 79 So. 3d 529, 539 (Miss. | 2 | 2 |
Pierce v. Cookgreen2 sentences2010This Court has recently stated, “[ojrdinary jurors possess the requisite knowledge and lay expertise to determine if an adulterous affair between an attorney and his client’s wife is a breach of a duty owed by an attorney to his client.” Pierce v. Cook, 992 So.2d 612, 618 (Miss.2008). 2010This Court has recently stated, "[o]rdinary jurors possess the requisite knowledge and lay expertise to determine if an adulterous affair between an attorney and his client's wife is a breach of a duty owed by an attorney to his client." Pierce v. Cook, 992 So.2d 612, 618 (Miss.2008). | 2 | 2 |
Garlotte v. Stategreen1 sentence2013“The doctrine of prosecutorial vindictiveness ‘precludes action by a prosecutor that is designed to penalize a defendant for invoking any legally protected right available to a defendant during a criminal prosecution.’” Russell v. State, 79 So.3d 529, 539 (Miss.Ct.App.2011) (quoting Garlotte v. State, 915 So.2d 460, 467 (Miss.Ct.App.2005)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Marcelino Saavedragreen2 sentences2004United States v. Saavedra, 223 F.3d 85, 89 (2nd Cir.2000). 1 In its analysis, the Second Circuit explained that when the elements of a crime occur wholly within a jurisdiction other than the one where prosecution is sought, the court must then determine whether the crime may properly be defined as a continuing offense. 2004Id. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Bin Ladengreen2 sentences2004“There is nothing in Reed which says that the effects of a crime alone may ever serve as an independent basis for venue when all other considerations properly point to another judicial district.” United States v. Bin Laden, 146 F.Supp.2d 373, 378 (S.D.N.Y.2001). 2004“There is nothing in Reed which says that the effects of a crime alone may ever serve as an independent basis for venue when all other considerations properly point to another judicial district.” United States v. Bin Laden, 146 F.Supp.2d 373, 378 (S.D.N.Y.2001). | 1 | 1 |
Stringer v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Reed’s claim is addressed under a two-part test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and followed by the Mississippi Supreme Court in Stringer v. State, 454 So.2d 468, 476 (Miss.1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Spencer Bowens, A/K/A Scooter, A/K/A Clyde, A/K/A Melvin McCurdy A/K/A Doc Johnson
green
1 sentence2004The Fourth Circuit cogently analyzed the import of these two cases as well as the status of the Reed test in United States v. Boivens, 224 F.3d 302 (4th Cir. 2000). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2002Reed’s claim is addressed under a two-part test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and followed by the Mississippi Supreme Court in Stringer v. State, 454 So.2d 468, 476 (Miss.1984). 2002Reed’s claim is addressed under a two-part test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and followed by the Mississippi Supreme Court in Stringer v. State, 454 So.2d 468, 476 (Miss.1984). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence2001Id.; Brown, 533 So.2d at 1124 . ¶ 14. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Gaskin v. State
green
1 sentence1999Gaskin, 618 So.2d at 107 . ¶ 15. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Walker Mfg. Co. v. Cantrell
green
1 sentence1992Walker Manufacturing, 577 So.2d at 1248 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.