9 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Curtisgreen2 sentences1995Curtis, 787 P.2d at 315 (citations omitted). 1990Curtis, 787 P.2d at 315 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Fosheegreen1 sentence1997See, e.g., Foshee, 938 P.2d at 605-07 ; Lane, 927 P.2d at 993 ; Tweedy, 922 P.2d at 1139 ; Matthews, 894 P.2d at 288-89 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences1991Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 . 1991Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 . | 2 | 1990–1991 |
State v. Spang
green
2 sentences2026State v. Spang, 2007 MT 54, ¶ 12 , 336 Mont. 184 , 153 P.3d 646 (internal citations omitted). 20 a. oppressive pretrial incarceration ¶59 To determine whether the pretrial incarceration was oppressive we must consider the duration of the incarceration, the complexity of the charged offenses, any misconduct related to the pretrial incarceration, and the conditions of the incarceration. 2026State v. Spang, 2007 MT 54, ¶ 12 , 336 Mont. 184 , 153 P.3d 646 (internal citations omitted). 20 a. oppressive pretrial incarceration ¶59 To determine whether the pretrial incarceration was oppressive we must consider the duration of the incarceration, the complexity of the charged offenses, any misconduct related to the pretrial incarceration, and the conditions of the incarceration. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Lane
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Foshee, 938 P.2d at 605-07 ; Lane, 927 P.2d at 993 ; Tweedy, 922 P.2d at 1139 ; Matthews, 894 P.2d at 288-89 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Matthews
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Foshee, 938 P.2d at 605-07 ; Lane, 927 P.2d at 993 ; Tweedy, 922 P.2d at 1139 ; Matthews, 894 P.2d at 288-89 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Tweedy
green
1 sentence1997See, e.g., Foshee, 938 P.2d at 605-07 ; Lane, 927 P.2d at 993 ; Tweedy, 922 P.2d at 1139 ; Matthews, 894 P.2d at 288-89 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Brymerski v. City of Great Falls
green
2 sentences1990In Brymerski, 195 Mont. at 432 , 636 P.2d at 849 , we held that the defendant had not been prejudiced since most of the witnesses were still available to testify and records and files continued to be available as evidence. 1990In Brymerski, 195 Mont. at 432 , 636 P.2d at 849 , we held that the defendant had not been prejudiced since most of the witnesses were still available to testify and records and files continued to be available as evidence. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Morris
green
2 sentences1990Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 118 ; State v. Morris (1988), 230 Mont. 311, 316 , 749 P.2d 1379, 1382 . 1990Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 118 ; State v. Morris (1988), 230 Mont. 311, 316 , 749 P.2d 1379, 1382 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1984Stolze (1981), 195 Mont. 263 , 637 P.2d 10 , give rise to an impairment claim that is not a class as contemplated by Section 39-71-737, MCA? (2) Does Part 10 of the Workers’ Compensation Act give rise to a separate rehabilitation benefit that is not a class as contemplated by Section 39-71-737, MCA? (3) Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in awarding part of the partial disability payments in a lump sum? (4) Should appellant-employer be required to pay the 20% penalty as provided for in Section 39-71-2907, MCA, for dilatory payment of workers’ compensation benefits? 1984Stolze (1981), 195 Mont. 263 , 637 P.2d 10 , give rise to an impairment claim that is not a class as contemplated by Section 39-71-737, MCA? (2) Does Part 10 of the Workers’ Compensation Act give rise to a separate rehabilitation benefit that is not a class as contemplated by Section 39-71-737, MCA? (3) Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in awarding part of the partial disability payments in a lump sum? (4) Should appellant-employer be required to pay the 20% penalty as provided for in Section 39-71-2907, MCA, for dilatory payment of workers’ compensation benefits? | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.