7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lahr v. Stategreen2 sentences1998See Lahr , 615 N.E.2d at 153 (citing Barker , 407 U.S. at 532 ). 1997See Lahr, 615 N.E.2d at 153 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ). | 2 | 2 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences1998See Lahr , 615 N.E.2d at 153 (citing Barker , 407 U.S. at 532 ). 1997See Lahr, 615 N.E.2d at 153 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ). | 2 | 2 |
Price v. Stategreen2 sentences2015“If the expression, viewed in context, is ambiguous, it is not political speech, and we evaluate the constitutionality of the impairment under standard rationality review.” Id. (quoting Whittington, 669 N.E.2d at 1370 ). 2013Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d at 805 (quoting Whittington, 669 N.E.2d at 1370 ) (emphasis added); see also Price, 622 N.E.2d at 964 (“[T]reating as abuse political speech which does not harm any particular individual (‘public nuisance’) does amount to a material burden, but holding that sanctioning expression which inflicts upon determinable parties harm of a gravity analogous to that required under tort law does not.”). 18 “Thus, determining whether a statute imposes a material burden . . . may involve two components: ‘magnitude of the impairment’ analysis and ‘particularized harm’ analysis.” Econ | 1 | 2 |
Barnes v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Barnes v. State, 946 N.E.2d 572, 577 (Ind. 2011), adhered to on reh’g, 953 N.E.2d 473 (Ind. 2011). [23] At the bench trial, Officer Jellison testified that during the arrest, Murphy challenged the validity of the warrant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Whittington v. State
green
2 sentences2015“If the expression, viewed in context, is ambiguous, it is not political speech, and we evaluate the constitutionality of the impairment under standard rationality review.” Id. (quoting Whittington, 669 N.E.2d at 1370 ). 2013Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d at 805 (quoting Whittington, 669 N.E.2d at 1370 ) (emphasis added); see also Price, 622 N.E.2d at 964 (“[T]reating as abuse political speech which does not harm any particular individual (‘public nuisance’) does amount to a material burden, but holding that sanctioning expression which inflicts upon determinable parties harm of a gravity analogous to that required under tort law does not.”). 18 “Thus, determining whether a statute imposes a material burden . . . may involve two components: ‘magnitude of the impairment’ analysis and ‘particularized harm’ analysis.” Econ | 2 | 2013–2015 |
Barnes v. State
green
1 sentence2019Barnes v. State, 946 N.E.2d 572, 577 (Ind. 2011), adhered to on reh’g, 953 N.E.2d 473 (Ind. 2011). [23] At the bench trial, Officer Jellison testified that during the arrest, Murphy challenged the validity of the warrant. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Economic Freedom Fund
green
2 sentences2013Freedom, Fund, 959 N.E.2d at 806 . 2013Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d at 805 (quoting Whittington, 669 N.E.2d at 1370 ) (emphasis added); see also Price, 622 N.E.2d at 964 (“[T]reating as abuse political speech which does not harm any particular individual (‘public nuisance’) does amount to a material burden, but holding that sanctioning expression which inflicts upon determinable parties harm of a gravity analogous to that required under tort law does not.”). 18 “Thus, determining whether a statute imposes a material burden . . . may involve two components: ‘magnitude of the impairment’ analysis and ‘particularized harm’ analysis.” Econ | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Harrell v. State
green
1 sentence1998Defendant contends that he suffered a “presumptive prejudice” as described in Harrell v. State, 614 N.E.2d 959 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), or at least a palpable prejudice. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bronson v. Kinzie
green
2 sentences1937This doctrine, beginning with Bronson v. Kizie, 1 How. 311 , 11 L. 1937This doctrine, beginning with Bronson v. Kizie, 1 How. 311 , 11 L. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.