Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1964–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Goldsborogreen2 sentences1991Atlantic Coast Line v. Goldsboro, 232 U.S. 548, 555 (1914). . 1991Atlantic Coast Line v. Goldsboro, 232 U.S. 548, 555 (1914). [6] The Opinion In Support Of Affirmance states without support therefor "[T]his Court has also held that unilateral, governmental action breaching employees' contractual rights is an unconstitutional impairment of contract — despite having as its purpose the economic enhancement of the Commonwealth." At 264 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. DeBlasegreen1 sentence1999The last consideration, impairment of or prejudice to the defense, represents the most serious of these three concerns, because the inability of a defendant adequately to properly prepare his case for *395 trial skews the fairness of the entire system. [[Image here]] In order to prove a case of specific prejudice to the defense, appellant must prove (1) impairment of witness’ memories; (2) loss of evidence; (3) loss of witnesses; or (4) other specifically articulable facts representing a substantial interference with his ability to conduct a defense. [[Image here]] The speedy trial guarantee i | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Glovergreen2 sentences1995Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ; Commonwealth v. Glover, 500 Pa. 524, 529 , 458 A.2d 935, 938 (1983). 1995Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ; Commonwealth v. Glover, 500 Pa. 524, 529 , 458 A.2d 935, 938 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences1995Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ; Commonwealth v. Glover, 500 Pa. 524, 529 , 458 A.2d 935, 938 (1983). 1995Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ; Commonwealth v. Glover, 500 Pa. 524, 529 , 458 A.2d 935, 938 (1983). | 2 | 1977–1995 |
Commonwealth v. Ware
green
2 sentences1977Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ; Ware, supra at 459 Pa. 348 , 329 A.2d at 265 . 1977Barker, supra, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ; Ware, supra at 459 Pa. 348 , 329 A.2d at 265 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Cool v. Curtis-Wright, Inc.
green
2 sentences1964In Cool v. Curtis-Wright, 362 Pa. 60 , 66 A. 2d 287 , cited by appellants, recovery was sought in trespass for an alleged impairment of hearing. 1964In Cool v. Curtis-Wright, 362 Pa. 60 , 66 A. 2d 287 , cited by appellants, recovery was sought in trespass for an alleged impairment of hearing. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.