Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Tommy Robertsgreen2 sentences2001It includes any threat to "`an accused's significant stakes—psychological, physical and financial—in the prompt termination of a proceeding which may ultimately deprive him of life, liberty or property.'" United States v. Dreyer, 533 F.2d 112, 115 (3d Cir.1976) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 515 F.2d 642, 645 (2d Cir. 1975)). 2001It includes any threat to “ ‘an accused’s significant stakes — psychological, physical and financial — in the prompt termination of a proceeding which may ultimately deprive him of life, liberty or property.’ ” United States v. Dreyer, 533 F.2d 112, 115 (3d Cir. 1976) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 515 F.2d 642, 645 (2d Cir. 1975)). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Joel P. Dreyer Appeal of Audrey Ellen Goldsmithgreen2 sentences2001It includes any threat to "`an accused's significant stakes—psychological, physical and financial—in the prompt termination of a proceeding which may ultimately deprive him of life, liberty or property.'" United States v. Dreyer, 533 F.2d 112, 115 (3d Cir.1976) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 515 F.2d 642, 645 (2d Cir. 1975)). 2001It includes any threat to “ ‘an accused’s significant stakes — psychological, physical and financial — in the prompt termination of a proceeding which may ultimately deprive him of life, liberty or property.’ ” United States v. Dreyer, 533 F.2d 112, 115 (3d Cir. 1976) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 515 F.2d 642, 645 (2d Cir. 1975)). | 2 | 2 |
Tyrpak v. Danielsgreen2 sentences2006Under our jurisprudence, as well as that of the Supreme Court, this is fatal to an impairment claim. [5] ś 21 In Tyrpak , for example, the trial court expressly found: "The value of outstanding G.O. bonds is reduced due to 1) the removal of part of the PORT OF VANCOUVER'S assessed territory by the proposed annexation, and 2) the uncertainty of further annexation in the future." Tyrpak, 124 Wash.2d at 151 , 874 P.2d 1374 (quoting Clerk's Papers at 75). 2006Under our jurisprudence, as well as that of the Supreme Court, this is fatal to an impairment claim. 27 ¶89 In Tyrpak , for example, the trial court expressly found: “The value of outstanding [general obligation] bonds is reduced due to 1) the removal of part of the PORT OF VANCOUVER’S assessed territory by the proposed annexation, and 2) the uncertainty of further annexation in the future.” Tyrpak, 124 Wn.2d at 151 (quoting Clerk’s Papers at 75). | 1 | 3 |
Doggett v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2020See Ollivier, 178 Wn.2d at 844 -45 (citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 112 S. Ct. 2686 , 120 L. 2020See Ollivier, 178 Wn.2d at 844 -45 (citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 112 S. Ct. 2686 , 120 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Olliviergreen1 sentence2020See Ollivier, 178 Wn.2d at 844 -45 (citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 112 S. Ct. 2686 , 120 L. | 1 | 1 |
State Bank of Hartland v. Arndtgreen2 sentences1991We are persuaded by these cases that the impairment analysis should begin with the essential inquiry of whether the creditor had any obligation or duty to protect the security interest for the benefit of the surety. *735 State Bank v. Arndt, 129 Wis.2d 411, 416-20 , 385 N.W.2d 219, 222-23 (Ct. App. 1986) is instructive. 1991We are persuaded by these cases that the impairment analysis should begin with the essential inquiry of whether the creditor had any obligation or duty to protect the security interest for the benefit of the surety. *735 State Bank v. Arndt, 129 Wis.2d 411, 416-20 , 385 N.W.2d 219, 222-23 (Ct. App. 1986) is instructive. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System
green
2 sentences2006But that fact needs to be proved, not just assumed, to sustain an impairment claim. [6] Haberman, relied upon by Tyrpak , expressly rejected a contract impairment claim because there was no proof that the legislative change at issue "diminished the value of their bonds, thus unconstitutionally impairing the force of their contracts." 109 Wash.2d at 146 , 744 P.2d 1032 . 2006Haberman, relied upon by Tyrpak , expressly rejected a contract impairment claim because there was no proof that the legislative change at issue “diminished the value of their bonds, thus unconstitutionally impairing the force of their contracts.” Haberman, 109 Wn.2d at 146 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
United States Trust Co. of NY v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2006Tyrpak, 124 Wash.2d at 156 , 874 P.2d 1374 (citing U.S. Trust Co. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1, 23-24 , 97 S.Ct. 1505 , 52 L.Ed.2d 92 (1977)). 2006Id. (citing U.S. Trust Co., 431 U.S. at 23-24 ). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Iniguez
green
1 sentence2025Iniguez, 167 Wn.2d at 295 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. O'Brien
green
2 sentences2006O'Brien , relied upon by Haberman as well as the majority, found a contract impairment was caused by the refusal of the state treasurer to remit to petitioner certain tax proceeds based upon a stipulation "that the bonds will be diminished in value from $30 to $60 per thousand dollars par value." O'Brien, 86 Wash.2d at 352 , 544 P.2d 729 . 2006O'Brien , relied upon by Haberman as well as the majority, found a contract impairment was caused by the refusal of the state treasurer to remit to petitioner certain tax proceeds based upon a stipulation "that the bonds will be diminished in value from $30 to $60 per thousand dollars par value." O'Brien, 86 Wash.2d at 352 , 544 P.2d 729 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
cluster 412099
green
1 sentence2006Id. (citing U.S. Trust Co., 431 U.S. at 23-24 ). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
green
2 sentences1994Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 412-13 , 74 L. 1994Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 412-13 , 74 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.