8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Winston v. Millaudgreen1 sentence2022App. 4 Cir. 4/12/06), 930 So.2d 144, 150 (citations omitted). 3 Ms. Taylor’s brief concerning the motion for new trial does not raise any issue outside of those pertaining to the underlying judgment. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2014See id., 12-0114, pp. 12-13, 104 So.3d at 687-688 . 2014See id., 12-0114, p. 11, 104 So.3d at 687 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McQun
neutral
2 sentences2011While the failure to rule on a motion to reconsider sentence would preclude review of a defendant’s sentence, see State v. McQun, 2002-0259 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/19/02) , 828 So.2d 598 , the defendant does not seek preview of his sentence. 2011While the failure to rule on a motion to reconsider sentence would preclude review of a defendant’s sentence, see State v. McQun, 2002-0259 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/19/02) , 828 So.2d 598 , the defendant does not seek preview of his sentence. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010The supreme court set out the criteria for the reviewing court’s evaluation of the trial court’s grant or rejection of a JNOV in Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), 772 So.2d 94, 99 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Mims
green
1 sentence2005State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 (La.1993). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club
green
1 sentence2003The ruling of the trial court was reversed and remanded by this court in Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club, 95-388 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/04/95) , 663 So.2d 379 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, supra ; Nowlin v. Breck Const. Co., supra . [1] The WCJ imposed penalties and fees because she found that Columbian made "not one shred of investigation" to assess the validity of Ms. Taylor's claim of a knee injury. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1999Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, supra ; Nowlin v. Breck Const. Co., supra . [1] The WCJ imposed penalties and fees because she found that Columbian made "not one shred of investigation" to assess the validity of Ms. Taylor's claim of a knee injury. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Daniel v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1975However, in Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct. *635 704, 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975), the U. S. Supreme Court held that the Taylor rule was to operate prospectively only. 1975However, in Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct. *635 704, 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975), the U. S. Supreme Court held that the Taylor rule was to operate prospectively only. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. Rester
green
2 sentences1975This Court applied the Daniel holding in State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975). 1975This Court applied the Daniel holding in State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.