indemnity claim (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

indemnity claim in Maryland

8 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1949–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc.green
mdctspecapp · 1976 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc., 33 Md.App. 372, 393 , 365 A.2d 325 (1976) (maritime law); Frasca v. S/S Safina E.

1996See Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc., 33 Md.App. 372, 393 , 365 A.2d 325 (1976) (maritime law); Frasca v. S/S Safina E.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
Sergeant Co. v. Pickettgreen
md · 1979 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979But see Sergeant Company v. Pickett. 285 Md. 186 (1979). —exclusivity— Shell contends, and we agree, that if Judge Sklar granted summary judgment because the indemnity clause was *6 statutorily void, he was wrong.

11

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Board of Trustees v. RTKL Associates, Inc. green
mdctspecapp · 1989
2 sentences

2006Id. at 56-57 , 559 A.2d 805 .

1996“If the [plaintiffs] complaint alleges conduct that constitutes active [wrongdoing] on the part of the party seeking indemnification, or if it is clear from circumstances revealed in the complaint that liability would only arise from proof of active [wrongdoing], there is no basis for an indemnity claim.” Id.

21996–2006
Boatel Industries, Inc. v. Hester green
mdctspecapp · 1988
2 sentences

2006With respect to the indemnity claim, it appears the court relied heavily on this Court’s decision in Boatel Industries, Inc. v. Hester, 77 Md.

2006App. 284 , 550 A.2d 389 (1988).

12006–2006
Franklin v. Morrison green
md · 1998
2 sentences

2006In most of the Maryland cases addressing the active-passive negligence distinction, the Courts either concluded that there was no right to indemnity on the facts before it, see Franklin, 350 Md. 144 , 711 A.2d 177 , or the issue of recovery for attorney’s fees and costs, as distinguished from damages, was not presented.

2006In most of the Maryland cases addressing the active-passive negligence distinction, the Courts either concluded that there was no right to indemnity on the facts before it, see Franklin, 350 Md. 144 , 711 A.2d 177 , or the issue of recovery for attorney’s fees and costs, as distinguished from damages, was not presented.

12006–2006
Mass Transit Administration v. CSX Transportation, Inc. green
md · 1998
2 sentences

1999Rather, it was a service contract that contained an indemnity clause, which “was intended ... to serve as liability insurance for CSXT.” Id. at 310 , 708 A.2d 298 .

1999Rather, it was a service contract that contained an indemnity clause, which “was intended ... to serve as liability insurance for CSXT.” Id. at 310 , 708 A.2d 298 .

11999–1999
Lynch v. United States green
scotus · 1934
1 sentence

1997In general, when a government "enters into contract relations, its rights and duties therein are governed generally by the law applicable to contracts between private individuals." Lynch v. United States , 292 U.S. 571 , 579 (1934). *Page 111

11997–1997
Cotham and Maldonado v. Board of County Commissioners green
md · 1971
2 sentences

1989Valk refers to Cotham and Maldonado v. Board, 260 Md. 556 , 273 A.2d 115 (1971), where we held that failure to issue notice within 180 days to a municipal entity does not bar a third party defendant’s indemnity claim against a defendant.

1989Valk refers to Cotham and Maldonado v. Board, 260 Md. 556 , 273 A.2d 115 (1971), where we held that failure to issue notice within 180 days to a municipal entity does not bar a third party defendant’s indemnity claim against a defendant.

11989–1989
Pyramid Condominium Ass'n. v. Morgan green
mdd · 1985
1 sentence

1989Pyramid, 606 F.Supp. at 596 .

11989–1989
American Stevedores, Inc. v. Porello green
scotus · 1947
1 sentence

1949The Court said [ 330 U. S. 446 , 67 S. Ct. 854 ] : “From the record it is not clear whether the District Court made any finding as to the meaning of the contract.

11949–1949

Where else courts name it

CA 194 (1956–2026) NY 107 (1926–2025) TX 100 (1922–2026) IL 84 (1899–2026) FL 48 (1964–2025) LA 48 (1970–2024) MA 45 (1976–2014) PA 44 (1943–2025) IN 42 (1940–2025) CT 38 (1925–2016) WA 33 (1922–2025) OR 28 (1959–2024) AK 26 (1976–2023) GA 25 (1977–2025) AL 25 (1932–2017) MN 24 (1958–2026) MI 24 (1978–2022) IA 20 (1963–2023) NJ 19 (1958–2025) DE 16 (1973–2024) MS 15 (1991–2010) AZ 14 (1975–2017) NM 13 (1959–2021) CO 12 (1973–2025) WV 11 (1985–2024) NC 11 (1982–2026) MO 11 (1961–2024) OH 11 (1992–2026) SC 10 (1927–2026) KY 10 (1958–2025) VT 9 (1991–2026) MT 9 (1973–2017) MD 8 (1949–2006) NV 8 (1997–2013) TN 8 (1934–2018) DC 8 (1984–2011) WI 7 (1942–2019) RI 7 (1995–2015) VA 7 (1967–2005) KS 7 (1979–2022) OK 6 (1935–2006) AR 6 (1991–2026) ID 6 (1923–2021) UT 6 (1989–2019) ND 6 (1979–2002) ME 5 (1985–2003) NH 5 (1974–2010) SD 3 (1990–2016) WY 3 (1987–1992) NE 3 (1997–2022) VI 2 (2002–2017) HI 2 (1985–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check