8 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dave Brundage v. Cumberland Countygreen1 sentence2017The trial court cited the principle that “the Court should look to the substance rather than the form and try to reach the merits of a case.” See, e.g., Brundage v. Cumberland Cnty., 357 S.W.3d 361, 371 (Tenn. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Hillgreen1 sentence2013“Doubt as to credibility of a witness for this purpose does not arise from the mere fact that the witness is a party or otherwise interested in the result.” Lewis v. Hill, 770 S.W.2d 751, 754 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).13 “The opponent to the motion for summary judgment must raise a genuine doubt as to witness credibility.” Bailey Tool & Mfg. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Poseygreen1 sentence2005The cited factors are "merely instructive and not exclusive considerations." Id.; see also Posey, 99 S.W.3d at 149 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen1 sentence1998We commented that “virtually every time one is charged 7 with a felony by way of criminal responsibility for the conduct of another, facilitation of the felony should be a lesser included offense.” Lewis, 919 S.W.2d at 67 (italics in original). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aaron v. Aaron
green
2 sentences2009Among the cited factors, the “real need of the [disadvantaged] spouse seeking the support is the single most important factor . . . [and next] the courts most often consider the ability of the obligor spouse to provide support.” Aaron v. Aaron, 909 S.W.2d at 410 . 2009Among the cited factors, the “real need of the [disadvantaged] spouse seeking the support is the single most important factor ... [and next] the courts most often consider the ability of the obligor spouse to provide support.” Aaron v. Aaron, 909 S.W.2d at 410 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Blair v. Campbell
green
1 sentence2013In Blair v. Campbell, 924 S.W.2d 75 (Tenn. 1996), the court cited the rule enunciated in Shell Oil v. Blanks and applied it to affirm a summary judgment for the defendant landowner. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State Ex Rel. Guy v. Foster
neutral
1 sentence1966Guy v. Foster, 160 Tenn. 285 , 24 S.W.(2d) 897 , said: "Such remandment must be based upon the record alone, and not upon matter outside of the record, such as affidavits, etc., for the remandment upon matter outside of the record would require the exercise of original and not appellate jurisdiction.” (cases cited) In view of the above cited rule to remand the cause to permit the introduction of this covenant not to sue, we would be going outside the record. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.