6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
California v. Greenred1 sentence2001See id. (citing California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Marianna v. Arkansas Municipal League
green
2 sentences1994Municipal League, 291 Ark. 74 , 722 S.W.2d 578 (1987), the court cited the analysis in West, but found the determinative factor was whether there was a lack of profit motive. 1994Municipal League, 291 Ark. 74 , 722 S.W.2d 578 (1987), the court cited the analysis in West, but found the determinative factor was whether there was a lack of profit motive. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Harris v. State
green
2 sentences1994This is just plain common sense as well as good law. 273 Ark. at 357 , 620 S.W.2d at 290 . 1994This is just plain common sense as well as good law. 273 Ark. at 357 , 620 S.W.2d at 290 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
James Dean Walker v. O. E. Bishop, Superintendent of Arkansas State Penitentiary
green
1 sentence1994The court cited the test set out in Walker v. Bishop, 408 F.2d 1378 (8th Cir. 1969). [Tjhe only way to ascertain the true meaning or import of any isolated remark is to consider it in the light and context in which it is uttered. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Acme Brick Co. v. ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N
green
2 sentences1988The only cited exception to this general rule that we do not evaluate.methods occurred in Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Comm’n, 227 Ark. 436 , 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957). 1988The only cited exception to this general rule that we do not evaluate.methods occurred in Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Comm’n, 227 Ark. 436 , 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Arkansas Fuel Oil Company v. Downs
neutral
2 sentences1964In Arkansas Fuel Oil Company v. Downs, 205 Ark. 281 , 168 S. W. 2d 419 , this court cited the rule as follows: “ ‘The right of the public to use a highway extends to the whole breadth thereof, and not merely to the part which is worked or actually traveled; and consequently, an obstruction upon the untraveled part is a proper subject of complaint by the public or persons specially injured,’ and in American Jurisprudence, Vol. 25, p. 809, § 527, we find this language: ‘Even though the entire width of a highway is not prepared for travel, or although a bridge or culvert does not extend to its en 1964In Arkansas Fuel Oil Company v. Downs, 205 Ark. 281 , 168 S. W. 2d 419 , this court cited the rule as follows: “ ‘The right of the public to use a highway extends to the whole breadth thereof, and not merely to the part which is worked or actually traveled; and consequently, an obstruction upon the untraveled part is a proper subject of complaint by the public or persons specially injured,’ and in American Jurisprudence, Vol. 25, p. 809, § 527, we find this language: ‘Even though the entire width of a highway is not prepared for travel, or although a bridge or culvert does not extend to its en | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Bizzell v. Hamiter
green
2 sentences1938In the decision of that case the court cited the rule announced in Healey v. Cockrill, supra, and in Biszell v. Hamiter, 168 Ark. 476 , 270 S. W. 602 , and Keller v. White, 173 Ark. 885 , 293 S. W. 1017 , in all of which announcements the same principle of law is adhered to with such faithfulness no controversy remains to justify further discussion. 1938In the decision of that case the court cited the rule announced in Healey v. Cockrill, supra, and in Biszell v. Hamiter, 168 Ark. 476 , 270 S. W. 602 , and Keller v. White, 173 Ark. 885 , 293 S. W. 1017 , in all of which announcements the same principle of law is adhered to with such faithfulness no controversy remains to justify further discussion. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Keller v. White
neutral
2 sentences1938In the decision of that case the court cited the rule announced in Healey v. Cockrill, supra, and in Biszell v. Hamiter, 168 Ark. 476 , 270 S. W. 602 , and Keller v. White, 173 Ark. 885 , 293 S. W. 1017 , in all of which announcements the same principle of law is adhered to with such faithfulness no controversy remains to justify further discussion. 1938In the decision of that case the court cited the rule announced in Healey v. Cockrill, supra, and in Biszell v. Hamiter, 168 Ark. 476 , 270 S. W. 602 , and Keller v. White, 173 Ark. 885 , 293 S. W. 1017 , in all of which announcements the same principle of law is adhered to with such faithfulness no controversy remains to justify further discussion. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.