Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1890–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Badgergreen2 sentences2009See id. at 449 , 450 A.2d at 347 (“If our state constitution is to mean anything, it must be enforced where it is the only law capable of providing a final answer to a claim, and a party, such as this defendant, has invoked its protections.”). 2009See id. at 449 , 450 A.2d at 347 (“If our state constitution is to mean anything, it must be enforced where it is the only law capable of providing a final answer to a claim, and a party, such as this defendant, has invoked its protections.”). | 2 | 3 |
Monti v. Granite Savings Bank and Trust Co.green2 sentences2003Bank & Trust Co., 133 Vt. 204, 209 , 333 A.2d 106, 109 (1975), it was error for the court to raise the issue sua sponte and dismiss the complaint. 2003Bank & Trust Co., 133 Vt. 204, 209 , 333 A.2d 106, 109 (1975), it was error for the court to raise the issue sua sponte and dismiss the complaint. | 1 | 1 |
Lillicrap v. Martingreen2 sentences2003DaimlerChrysler contends that because V.R.C.P. 8(c) requires the statute of limitations defense to be affirmatively pled in the defendant’s answer or the defense is waived, Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165, 170 , 591 A.2d 41, 43 (1989), and because the defendant bears the burden to establish the defense, Monti v. Granite Sav. 2003DaimlerChrysler contends that because V.R.C.P. 8(c) requires the statute of limitations defense to be affirmatively pled in the defendant’s answer or the defense is waived, Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165, 170 , 591 A.2d 41, 43 (1989), and because the defendant bears the burden to establish the defense, Monti v. Granite Sav. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. Henderson and Smith
green
1 sentence1943Taylor v. Henderson, 112 Vt 107, 113, 22 A2d 318 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Mayor of Baltimore Ex Rel. Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1942R. 931; Baltimore v. Maryland Casualty Co., 171 Md. 667 , 190 Atl. 250 . *431 The plaintiff also stresses the provision in the building contract that: “The contractor shall furnish a surety bond for the faithful performance of the contract and payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection with the contract.” The answer to its claim on this score is obvious. 1942R. 931; Baltimore v. Maryland Casualty Co., 171 Md. 667 , 190 Atl. 250 . *431 The plaintiff also stresses the provision in the building contract that: “The contractor shall furnish a surety bond for the faithful performance of the contract and payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection with the contract.” The answer to its claim on this score is obvious. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati
green
2 sentences1940State v. Auclair, 110 Vt. 147, 160 , 4 Atl. 2d. 107; Hodge Drive-it-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U. S. 335 , 52 Sup. Ct. 144, 76 L. 1940State v. Auclair, 110 Vt. 147, 160 , 4 Atl. 2d. 107; Hodge Drive-it-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U. S. 335 , 52 Sup. Ct. 144, 76 L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
State v. Auclair
green
1 sentence1940State v. Auclair, 110 Vt. 147, 160 , 4 Atl. 2d. 107; Hodge Drive-it-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U. S. 335 , 52 Sup. Ct. 144, 76 L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Dawley v. Wheeler
neutral
1 sentence1890But, treating the notes for this purpose as ordinary promissory notes, the case of Dawley v. Wheeler, 52 Vt. 574 , is a full answer to this claim. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.