self-incrimination privilege (Vermont) · Go Syfert
← Vermont issues

self-incrimination privilege in Vermont

8 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Minnesota v. Murphygreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016As in Murphy, there is no direct evidence that defendant confessed “because he feared that his probation would be revoked if he remained silent.” Id. at 437. ¶ 19.

2016As in Murphy, there is 9 no direct evidence that defendant confessed “because he feared that his probation would be revoked if he remained silent.” Id. at 437 . ¶ 19.

11
Maness v. Meyersgreen
scotus · 1975 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997See Maness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449, 464-65 (1975); 12 V.S.A. § 1662.

11
Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.green
vt · 1990 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996We have observed that “on remand the trial court is constrained to follow ‘our specific directions as interpreted in light of the opinion.’” State v. Higgins, 156 Vt. 192, 193 , 588 A.2d 1062, 1062 (1991) (quoting C oty v. Ramsey Assocs., 154 Vt. 168, 171 , 573 A.2d 694, 696 (1990)).

1996We have observed that “on remand the trial court is constrained to follow ‘our specific directions as interpreted in light of the opinion.’” State v. Higgins, 156 Vt. 192, 193 , 588 A.2d 1062, 1062 (1991) (quoting C oty v. Ramsey Assocs., 154 Vt. 168, 171 , 573 A.2d 694, 696 (1990)).

11
State v. Higginsgreen
vt · 1991 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996We have observed that “on remand the trial court is constrained to follow ‘our specific directions as interpreted in light of the opinion.’” State v. Higgins, 156 Vt. 192, 193 , 588 A.2d 1062, 1062 (1991) (quoting C oty v. Ramsey Assocs., 154 Vt. 168, 171 , 573 A.2d 694, 696 (1990)).

1996We have observed that “on remand the trial court is constrained to follow ‘our specific directions as interpreted in light of the opinion.’” State v. Higgins, 156 Vt. 192, 193 , 588 A.2d 1062, 1062 (1991) (quoting C oty v. Ramsey Assocs., 154 Vt. 168, 171 , 573 A.2d 694, 696 (1990)).

11
State v. Couturegreen
vt · 1985 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995State v. Couture, 146 Vt. 268, 273-74 , 502 A.2d 846, 850 (1985).

1995State v. Couture, 146 Vt. 268, 273-74 , 502 A.2d 846, 850 (1985).

11
State v. Breangreen
vt · 1978 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987State v. Brean, 136 Vt. 147, 151 , 385 A.2d 1085, 1088 (1978).

1987State v. Brean, 136 Vt. 147, 151 , 385 A.2d 1085, 1088 (1978).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In Re the Welfare of J.G.W. green
minn · 1989
2 sentences

1989The court found that the specific requirement violated the father’s self-incrimination privilege but added “that the privilege does not protect the parent from the consequences of any failure to succeed in a court-ordered treatment plan merits equal emphasis.” Id. at 886 .

1989The court found that the specific requirement violated the father's self-incrimination privilege but added "that the privilege does not protect the parent from the consequences of any failure to succeed in a court-ordered treatment plan merits equal emphasis." Id. at 886 .

21989–1989
State v. Steinhour green
vt · 1992
2 sentences

2016Id. at 300 , 607 A.2d at 889 .

2016Id. at 300 , 607 A.2d at 889 .

12016–2016
People v. Mattson green
cal · 1990
2 sentences

1991Despite this ruling, the court affirmed the introduction of the confession at the second trial because the State offered new evidence at a pretrial hearing to show that defendant initiated the interviews at which he confessed. 50 Cal. 3d at 852 , 789 P.2d at 1001 , 268 Cal. Rptr. at 820 .

1991Despite this ruling, the court affirmed the introduction of the confession at the second trial because the State offered new evidence at a pretrial hearing to show that defendant initiated the interviews at which he confessed. 50 Cal. 3d at 852 , 789 P.2d at 1001 , 268 Cal. Rptr. at 820 .

11991–1991

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1965–2025) IL 48 (1968–2026) TX 41 (1969–2024) FL 25 (1956–2021) OH 21 (1968–2025) NY 16 (1959–2004) AZ 15 (1963–2023) IA 15 (1965–2021) MD 13 (1968–2025) GA 12 (1977–2019) MA 11 (1977–2024) IN 11 (1990–2020) OR 11 (1977–2021) PA 9 (1967–2026) MI 9 (1977–2019) CT 9 (1968–2021) VT 8 (1987–2016) VA 8 (1990–2016) LA 8 (1964–2013) MO 7 (1976–2017) TN 7 (1976–2017) NJ 7 (1968–2020) WI 7 (1989–2023) HI 6 (1980–2022) CO 5 (1978–1999) ID 4 (1975–2007) MS 4 (1973–1992) RI 4 (1991–2018) ND 4 (1967–2009) UT 4 (1969–2023) DC 4 (1976–2006) NC 3 (1968–2010) NE 3 (1987–2020) AK 3 (1970–2000) NV 3 (1970–1997) AL 3 (1980–1998) MN 3 (1986–1991) AR 3 (1978–1984) KS 2 (1999–2003) SD 2 (1985–1985) SC 2 (1977–2008) NM 2 (1978–2011) OK 2 (1974–1989) ME 2 (1974–1986) KY 2 (1972–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check