8 West Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2023See id. 2023See id. | 2 | 2 |
North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Century Indemnity Co.green2 sentences2006Once the claimant or insured has exhausted all other sources of solvent insurance which collaterally insure the covered claim or where there exists no other solvent insurance which provides coverage for the covered claim, he/she is entitled to enforce his/her covered claim against the West Virginia Insurance Guaranty Association, to the extent allowed by W.Va.Code § 33-26-8(1)(a) (1985) (Repl.Vol.1996). [5] See, e.g., North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association v. Century Indemnity Company, 115 N.C.App. 175 , 444 S.E.2d 464 (1994); Metropolitan Leasing, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Ins. 2006Once the claimant or insured has exhausted all other sources of solvent insurance which collaterally insure the covered claim or where there exists no other solvent insurance which provides coverage for the covered claim, he/she is entitled to enforce his/her covered claim against the West Virginia Insurance Guaranty Association, to the extent allowed by W.Va.Code § 33-26-8(1)(a) (1985) (Repl.Vol.1996). [5] See, e.g., North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association v. Century Indemnity Company, 115 N.C.App. 175 , 444 S.E.2d 464 (1994); Metropolitan Leasing, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Metropolitan Leasing, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance
green
2 sentences2006Co., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 536 , 633 N.E.2d 434 (1994); Louisiana Ins. 2006Co., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 536 , 633 N.E.2d 434 (1994); Louisiana Ins. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
DeVane v. Kennedy
green
2 sentences2006As we slated in Syllabus Point 2 of DeVane v. Kennedy, 205 W.Va. 519 , 519 S.E.2d 622 (1999): When a claimant or an insured wishes to enforce a covered claim, as defined by W.Va. 2006As we slated in Syllabus Point 2 of DeVane v. Kennedy, 205 W.Va. 519 , 519 S.E.2d 622 (1999): When a claimant or an insured wishes to enforce a covered claim, as defined by W.Va. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Smith v. Animal Urgent Care, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003See American Motorists Insurance Company, Commercial General Liability Policy, Policy Number 3MG 769 951-03, p. 13, §§ V.13.a-e; Smith, 208 W.Va. at 668 , 542 S.E.2d at 831 . 2003See American Motorists Insurance Company, Commercial General Liability Policy, Policy Number 3MG 769 951-03, p. 13, §§ V.13.a-e; Smith, 208 W.Va. at 668 , 542 S.E.2d at 831 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
West Virginia Insurance Guaranty v. Potts
green
2 sentences2003This Court thus reversed the determination of the lower court and remanded the matter for entry of an order consistent with the conclusion that each of the five Potts family members could maintain a separate covered claim for which the WVIGA would be obligated up to the statutory limits. 209 W.Va. at 688 , 550 S.E.2d at 666 . 2003This Court thus reversed the determination of the lower court and remanded the matter for entry of an order consistent with the conclusion that each of the five Potts family members could maintain a separate covered claim for which the WVIGA would be obligated up to the statutory limits. 209 W.Va. at 688 , 550 S.E.2d at 666 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Igwilo v. Property & Casualty Ins. Guaranty Corp.
green
2 sentences2001Ass’n, 508 N.W.2d 536 (Minn.App.1993) (assertion of automobile accident victim’s covered claim under the primary policy issued by an insolvent insurer precluded victim’s mother from asserting a covered claim against MIGA as the primary policy had a single, per-aceident limit and, thus, there was only one covered claim); Igwilo v. Property Insurance, 131 Md.App. 629 , 750 A.2d 646 (2000) (parents’ claims for child’s pre-birth injury and for economic and non-economic damages resulting from medical malpractice were a single covered claim for purposes of the PCIGC’s liability; also, all claims der 2001Ass’n, 508 N.W.2d 536 (Minn.App.1993) (assertion of automobile accident victim’s covered claim under the primary policy issued by an insolvent insurer precluded victim’s mother from asserting a covered claim against MIGA as the primary policy had a single, per-aceident limit and, thus, there was only one covered claim); Igwilo v. Property Insurance, 131 Md.App. 629 , 750 A.2d 646 (2000) (parents’ claims for child’s pre-birth injury and for economic and non-economic damages resulting from medical malpractice were a single covered claim for purposes of the PCIGC’s liability; also, all claims der | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2001Co., 832 P.2d 834 (Okla.1992) (Guaranty Association is obligated to pay individual claims of each beneficiary up to the statutory maximum of $150,000 upon insolvency of insurer in wrongful death action rather than an aggregated total of $150,000 to all victims); Dickerson v. Thompson, 89 Ohio App.3d 399 , 624 N.E.2d 784 (1993) (decedent’s wife and two minor children each had a separate covered claim on which the state insurance guaranty association was obligated to pay; decedent’s personal injury action is distinct from the wrongful death action); Cooper v. Huddy, 581 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cox v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
green
1 sentence2001Ass’n, 508 N.W.2d 536 (Minn.App.1993) (assertion of automobile accident victim’s covered claim under the primary policy issued by an insolvent insurer precluded victim’s mother from asserting a covered claim against MIGA as the primary policy had a single, per-aceident limit and, thus, there was only one covered claim); Igwilo v. Property Insurance, 131 Md.App. 629 , 750 A.2d 646 (2000) (parents’ claims for child’s pre-birth injury and for economic and non-economic damages resulting from medical malpractice were a single covered claim for purposes of the PCIGC’s liability; also, all claims der | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Dickerson v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2001Co., 832 P.2d 834 (Okla.1992) (Guaranty Association is obligated to pay individual claims of each beneficiary up to the statutory maximum of $150,000 upon insolvency of insurer in wrongful death action rather than an aggregated total of $150,000 to all victims); Dickerson v. Thompson, 89 Ohio App.3d 399 , 624 N.E.2d 784 (1993) (decedent’s wife and two minor children each had a separate covered claim on which the state insurance guaranty association was obligated to pay; decedent’s personal injury action is distinct from the wrongful death action); Cooper v. Huddy, 581 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2001Co., 832 P.2d 834 (Okla.1992) (Guaranty Association is obligated to pay individual claims of each beneficiary up to the statutory maximum of $150,000 upon insolvency of insurer in wrongful death action rather than an aggregated total of $150,000 to all victims); Dickerson v. Thompson, 89 Ohio App.3d 399 , 624 N.E.2d 784 (1993) (decedent’s wife and two minor children each had a separate covered claim on which the state insurance guaranty association was obligated to pay; decedent’s personal injury action is distinct from the wrongful death action); Cooper v. Huddy, 581 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cooper v. Huddy
green
1 sentence2001Co., 832 P.2d 834 (Okla.1992) (Guaranty Association is obligated to pay individual claims of each beneficiary up to the statutory maximum of $150,000 upon insolvency of insurer in wrongful death action rather than an aggregated total of $150,000 to all victims); Dickerson v. Thompson, 89 Ohio App.3d 399 , 624 N.E.2d 784 (1993) (decedent’s wife and two minor children each had a separate covered claim on which the state insurance guaranty association was obligated to pay; decedent’s personal injury action is distinct from the wrongful death action); Cooper v. Huddy, 581 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cannelton Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of America
green
2 sentences1995Relying on West Virginia Code § 33-26-8(1)(a) which mandates that “ ‘a covered claim shall not include any claim filed with the guaranty fund after the final date set by the court for the filing of claims against the liquidator or receiver of an insolvent insurer[,]’” we found that “Cannelton received timely notice of the insolvencies, Cannelton did not become aware of the claims in question until after the expiration of the bar dates for filing proofs of claims ..., [and] [u]nder the language of the statute ... the claims would clearly not have been covered.” 194 W.Va. at 209 -10 and n. 14, 4 1995Relying on West Virginia Code § 33-26-8(1)(a) which mandates that “ ‘a covered claim shall not include any claim filed with the guaranty fund after the final date set by the court for the filing of claims against the liquidator or receiver of an insolvent insurer[,]’” we found that “Cannelton received timely notice of the insolvencies, Cannelton did not become aware of the claims in question until after the expiration of the bar dates for filing proofs of claims ..., [and] [u]nder the language of the statute ... the claims would clearly not have been covered.” 194 W.Va. at 209 -10 and n. 14, 4 | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n
green
2 sentences1994A Michigan court, in Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Mich. Property & Casualty Guaranty Association, 165 Mich.App. 768 , 419 N.W.2d 460 (1988), determined that a claim must be timely filed in order to be a covered claim under that state’s statute. 1994A Michigan court, in Satellite Bowl, Inc. v. Mich. Property & Casualty Guaranty Association, 165 Mich.App. 768 , 419 N.W.2d 460 (1988), determined that a claim must be timely filed in order to be a covered claim under that state’s statute. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.