covered claim in Missouri

2021The association appealed, claiming “that the commission lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to determine whether the present case involves a covered claim.” Id. at 626 .

1995Louis Ship, 896 S.W.2d 624 (Mo. banc 1995), the only point the court determined was that Commission has jurisdiction to determine whether employee’s claim is a covered claim within the meaning of § 375.785.3(2).

1987Appellant relies on the statute and on two cases decided by the Eastern District, Qualls v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Association, 714 S.W.2d 732 (Mo.App.1986), and Hankins Construction Co. v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Association, 724 S.W.2d 583 (Mo.App.1986).

1986This point was dealt with in Qualls, supra, 714 S.W.2d at page 736 , where this court stated that “[b]y requiring MIGA to take over the ‘rights, duties, and obligations of the insolvent insurer’ [pursuant to § 375.785.-4(l)(b) ] the legislature clearly continued the insured’s protection under his policy of insurance.

2019Id. at 90-91 . landowner liable for a subcontractor’s failure to provide adequate medical services during a boxing match.

1995The court recognized that if it “were to hold that the filing of a contingent claim was sufficient for purposes of being deemed a covered claim, the statutory filing deadline would have no meaning.” Id. 138 Ill.Dec. at 24 , 546 N.E.2d at 1079 .

1995The court recognized that if it “were to hold that the filing of a contingent claim was sufficient for purposes of being deemed a covered claim, the statutory filing deadline would have no meaning.” Id. 138 Ill.Dec. at 24 , 546 N.E.2d at 1079 .

1987Appellant relies on the statute and on two cases decided by the Eastern District, Qualls v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Association, 714 S.W.2d 732 (Mo.App.1986), and Hankins Construction Co. v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Association, 724 S.W.2d 583 (Mo.App.1986).