Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maine opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pinkham v. Morrillgreen2 sentences2007Member insurers “are assessed fees which make up the assets of the Association.” Pinkham v. Morrill, 622 A.2d 90, 93 (Me.1993). 2007Member insurers "are assessed fees which make up the assets of the Association." Pinkham v. Morrill, 622 A.2d 90, 93 (Me.1993). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kelley v. North East Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2019Id. [¶11] “Standard liability insurance policies provide that the insurer has a duty to indemnify the insured for those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages for a covered claim.” Harlor v. Amica Mut. 2019Id. [¶11] “Standard liability insurance policies provide that the insurer has a duty to indemnify the insured for those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages for a covered claim.” Harlor v. Amica Mut. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences2016Corp., 948 P.2d at 919 . 2016Corp., 70 Cal. Rptr.2d 118 , 948 P.2d at 919 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2004The JBI trustee counters that the weight of authority, public policy, and the statute’s purpose all require that exhaustion does not mean that there must be full payment of pobey limits. *656 We have not yet interpreted what constitutes exhaustion pursuant to the statute. [¶ 8] Title 24-A M.R.S.A. § 4443(1) states in relevant part: Any person having a claim against an insurer under any provision in an insurance policy, other than that of an insolvent insurer, which is also a covered claim, shall be required to exhaust first the person’s right under the policy.... [¶ 9] “When interpreting a sta 2004The JBI trustee counters that the weight of authority, public policy, and the statute’s purpose all require that exhaustion does not mean that there must be full payment of pobey limits. *656 We have not yet interpreted what constitutes exhaustion pursuant to the statute. [¶ 8] Title 24-A M.R.S.A. § 4443(1) states in relevant part: Any person having a claim against an insurer under any provision in an insurance policy, other than that of an insolvent insurer, which is also a covered claim, shall be required to exhaust first the person’s right under the policy.... [¶ 9] “When interpreting a sta | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.