typographical error in Alaska

2024They argue the court failed to draw reasonable factual inferences in their favor and improperly relied on a typographical error in their offer. 31 See In re Est. of Maguire, 466 P.2d 358 (Kan. 1970), modified on reh’g, 476 P.2d 618 ; Chournos v. Evona Inv.

2024Co., 93 P.2d 450 (Utah 1939). 32 See In re Maguire, 466 P.2d at 359, 361-62 ; Chournos, 93 P.2d at 452-53 . -14- 7713 However, the court’s conclusion that Hahn could reject the offer without waiving the purchase option did not depend on the typographical error it identified; instead, after considering all the evidence, the court explained that the Joys’ offer was “poorly drafted and confusing — containing various mistakes throughout.” The offer also contained material terms that differed from the express terms of the parties’ original agreement, including provisions raising the monthly rent Ha

2024Co., 93 P.2d 450 (Utah 1939). 32 See In re Maguire, 466 P.2d at 359, 361-62 ; Chournos, 93 P.2d at 452-53 . -14- 7713 However, the court’s conclusion that Hahn could reject the offer without waiving the purchase option did not depend on the typographical error it identified; instead, after considering all the evidence, the court explained that the Joys’ offer was “poorly drafted and confusing — containing various mistakes throughout.” The offer also contained material terms that differed from the express terms of the parties’ original agreement, including provisions raising the monthly rent Ha

2012This error is harmless because, as explained further in the text, the superior court's property division was equitable. . 40 P.3d 800 (Alaska 2002). .

2008Servs., Div. of Family & Youth Servs., 74 P.3d 896 (Alaska 2003). [13] AS 47.10.088(b). [14] OCS had sought to apply the abandonment provision, AS 47.10.011(1), to Ana, which may have led to a typographical error in the trial court's written order.

2008The trial court's oral findings provide a much more thorough explanation of its analysis, however, and leave us with no doubt that it did not intend to rely on AS 47.10.011(1). [15] AS 47.10.011(10). [16] 74 P.3d at 902-03 . [17] Id. at 898-900 . [18] Id. at 899 . [19] Id. at 902-03 . [20] Id. at 903 . [21] Id. at 902 . [22] Martin N. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc.

2004A more striking application of this rule is found in United States v. Hall, 632 F.2d 500 (5th Cir.1980).

2003The decree does contain a typographical error concerning the year of mediation. 22 . 938 P.2d 1002 (Alaska 1997). 23 .

2003Id. at 1006 . 24 .

1970Cf. People v. Schmidt, 216 N.Y. 324 , 110 N.E. 945 (1915), per Cardozo, J. [11] Speculation persists in Alaska legal circles that the use of the conjunctive "and" in the instructions which were validated in Chase possibly came about through a typographical error by the secretary to the trial court judge.

1970Cf. People v. Schmidt, 216 N.Y. 324 , 110 N.E. 945 (1915), per Cardozo, J. [11] Speculation persists in Alaska legal circles that the use of the conjunctive "and" in the instructions which were validated in Chase possibly came about through a typographical error by the secretary to the trial court judge.

1968Supreme Ct.R. 0 roads: An appeal may bo taken to this court from a final judgment entered by the superior court or a judge thereof in any action or proceeding, civil or criminal, except that the state shall have a right to appeal in criminal eases only to tost the sufficiency of the indictment or information. 10 . 207 F.2d 47, 48 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 915 , 74 S.Ct. 274 , 98 L.Ed. 411 (1953). 11 .

1968Supreme Ct.R. 0 roads: An appeal may bo taken to this court from a final judgment entered by the superior court or a judge thereof in any action or proceeding, civil or criminal, except that the state shall have a right to appeal in criminal eases only to tost the sufficiency of the indictment or information. 10 . 207 F.2d 47, 48 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 915 , 74 S.Ct. 274 , 98 L.Ed. 411 (1953). 11 .

1968Supreme Ct.R. 0 roads: An appeal may bo taken to this court from a final judgment entered by the superior court or a judge thereof in any action or proceeding, civil or criminal, except that the state shall have a right to appeal in criminal eases only to tost the sufficiency of the indictment or information. 10 . 207 F.2d 47, 48 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 915 , 74 S.Ct. 274 , 98 L.Ed. 411 (1953). 11 .