typographical error in Nebraska

2019As grounds for issuance of the search warrant, Orsi noted, inter alia, information obtained from Allison to the effect that - 412 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports STATE v. GARCIA Cite as 302 Neb. 406 she had taken Garcia to the bank and thereafter to his motel room.

2019As grounds for issuance of the search warrant, Orsi noted, inter alia, information obtained from Allison to the effect that - 412 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports STATE v. GARCIA Cite as 302 Neb. 406 she had taken Garcia to the bank and thereafter to his motel room.

2025ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH Cite as 319 Neb. 287 necessary money, or as much thereof as he is able to supply personally, by having a binding commitment for a loan.’” 20 The instruction should have read “‘unable.’” 21 In Tidd, we held that it was harmless error for an instruction to have the typographical error of stating “‘plaintiff’” instead of “‘defendant’” as follows: “‘That the plaintiff appeared as such attorney in said suits and performed certain legal services for and on behalf of the plaintiff.’” 22 We said that while the instruction was technically erroneous, in reading the whole instruc

2025The Hauxwells, on the other hand, argue that the district court’s reference to the 2021 hearing was merely a typographical error and that the record supports the district court’s finding that their due process rights were violated on this and other grounds. 44 Ronnfeldt Farms v. Arp, 317 Neb. 690 , 11 N.W.3d 371 (2024). - 21 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 319 Nebraska Reports HAUXWELL V.

2025MIDDLE REPUBLICAN NRD Cite as 319 Neb. 1 [13-17] A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. 45 A party appearing in an adjudication hearing before an agency or tribunal is entitled to due process protec- tions similar to those given litigants in a judicial proceed- ing; this includes the right to a hearing before an impartial, unbiased decisionmaker. 46 Rather than inquiring into whether the judge or adjudicator is actually, subjectively biased, the question is whether the average judge in his or her position is likely to be neutral, or whether there is an unconstit

2021The State further contends that the date on the mittimus was “clearly a typographical error.” Id.

1896(City of South Omaha v. Taxpayers’ League, 42 Neb., 671 .) The enrolled act on file in the office of the secretary of state has, however, been examined, and it is found that the act as passed by the legislature and approved by the governor properly repealed section 12 of the Criminal Code as theretofore existing, and not section 11, as the printed laws, through a typographical error, indicate.