Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Joswiak v. Northern Michigan Hospitals, Inc.green2 sentences2022See Jozwiak v Northern Mich Hosps, Inc, 207 Mich App 161, 166 ; 524 NW2d 250 (1994) (“Evidence of fraud or mistake could rebut the statutory presumption of validity” and a factual dispute regarding fraud or mistake “bears directly on the validity of the arbitration agreement.”). -4- We conclude that a question of fact remains as to whether defendant has the right to invoke arbitration and that the trial court erred when it granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition. 2022See Jozwiak v Northern Mich Hosps, Inc, 207 Mich App 161, 166 ; 524 NW2d 250 (1994) (“Evidence of fraud or mistake could rebut the statutory presumption of validity” and a factual dispute regarding fraud or mistake “bears directly on the validity of the arbitration agreement.”). -4- We conclude that a question of fact remains as to whether defendant has the right to invoke arbitration and that the trial court erred when it granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Cartergreen2 sentences2025See People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 215 ; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). -8- In the body of the website, defendant asserted that the victim’s claims against SK were provably false, and she further claimed that the victim set in motion the vicious attack on SK that nearly caused his death. 2025See People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 215 ; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). -8- In the body of the website, defendant asserted that the victim’s claims against SK were provably false, and she further claimed that the victim set in motion the vicious attack on SK that nearly caused his death. | 1 | 1 |
Village of Edmore v. Crystal Automation Systems Incgreen2 sentences2024From the above, and reading the contract as a whole, Village of Edmore, 322 Mich App at 262 , we cannot conclude that the first sentence of Section 5.1 contains a typographical error, and instead believe, like the trial court,1 that the Operating Agreement is ambiguous, and we must look to extrinsic evidence for its interpretation.2 Again, “[t]he primary goal in interpreting contracts is to determine and enforce the parties’ intent.” Village of Edmore, 322 Mich App at 262 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2024From the above, and reading the contract as a whole, Village of Edmore, 322 Mich App at 262 , we cannot conclude that the first sentence of Section 5.1 contains a typographical error, and instead believe, like the trial court,1 that the Operating Agreement is ambiguous, and we must look to extrinsic evidence for its interpretation.2 Again, “[t]he primary goal in interpreting contracts is to determine and enforce the parties’ intent.” Village of Edmore, 322 Mich App at 262 (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Wakergreen1 sentence2021See id. | 1 | 1 |
Abela v. General Motors Corp.green1 sentence2019See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hampton
green
2 sentences2021The prosecution relies, in part, on People v Hampton, 237 Mich App 143 ; 603 NW2d 270 (1999), in which the defendant challenged the validity of a search warrant on the basis of a typographical error that resulted in a different description of the target premises than that provided by the affidavit. 2021The prosecution relies, in part, on People v Hampton, 237 Mich App 143 ; 603 NW2d 270 (1999), in which the defendant challenged the validity of a search warrant on the basis of a typographical error that resulted in a different description of the target premises than that provided by the affidavit. | 2 | 2019–2021 |
Federated Publications, Inc v. Michigan State University Board of Trustees
green
2 sentences2026Instead, Const 1963, art 8, § 5 concerns the controlling boards of public universities, including the University of Michigan. -5- This provision “limit[s] the Legislature’s power[,]” because it “may not interfere with the management and control of universities.” Federated Publications, Inc v Bd of Trustees of Mich State Univ, 460 Mich 75, 86-87 ; 594 NW2d 491 (1999) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2026Instead, Const 1963, art 8, § 5 concerns the controlling boards of public universities, including the University of Michigan. -5- This provision “limit[s] the Legislature’s power[,]” because it “may not interfere with the management and control of universities.” Federated Publications, Inc v Bd of Trustees of Mich State Univ, 460 Mich 75, 86-87 ; 594 NW2d 491 (1999) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Tiedman v. Tiedman
green
2 sentences2023Tiedman v Tiedman, 400 Mich 571, 576 ; 255 NW2d 632 (1977). 2023Tiedman v Tiedman, 400 Mich 571, 576 ; 255 NW2d 632 (1977). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Contempt of Henry
green
2 sentences2019This appears to have been a typographical error because the written order states that termination was ordered under MCL 712A.19b(3)(j). “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.” In re Contempt of Henry, 282 Mich App 656, 678 ; 765 NW2d 44 (2009). -1- trial court ordered a treatment plan for all three parents. 2019This appears to have been a typographical error because the written order states that termination was ordered under MCL 712A.19b(3)(j). “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.” In re Contempt of Henry, 282 Mich App 656, 678 ; 765 NW2d 44 (2009). -1- trial court ordered a treatment plan for all three parents. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Hardy; People v. Glenn
green
1 sentence2019If the statute’s language is clear and unambiguous, we assume that the Legislature intended its plain meaning and we enforce the statute as written.” People v Hardy, 494 Mich 430, 439 ; 835 NW2d 340 (2013) (cleaned up).2 1 A typographical error on the SIR lists Dumback’s OV Level as IV. 2 This opinion uses the parenthetical (cleaned up) to improve readability without altering the substance of the quotation. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Danto
green
1 sentence2018Generally, for “an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must be raised, addressed, and decided by the lower court.” People v Danto, 294 Mich App 596, 605 ; 822 NW2d 600 (2011) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Draggoo v. Draggoo
green
1 sentence2016Thus, although an error is noted regarding the facts found, the disposition does not appear to have been relied upon by the trial court, and this Court is not left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Draggoo, 223 Mich App at 429 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Stow v. Common Council of Grand Rapids
neutral
1 sentence2002Board of Control, supra. Also nonsubstantative was the second alleged error in the bill in Stow, supra, because it involved a typographical error wrongly describing the act to be amended as an act from 1887, instead of 1877. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Board of Control v. Auditor General
neutral
1 sentence2002Board of Control, supra. Also nonsubstantative was the second alleged error in the bill in Stow, supra, because it involved a typographical error wrongly describing the act to be amended as an act from 1887, instead of 1877. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Meadowlanes Limited Dividend Housing Ass'n v. City of Holland
green
2 sentences1991The error was repeated by the Court of Appeals in 156 Mich App 238 ; 401 NW2d 620 (1986) (Meadowlanes I). 1991The error was repeated by the Court of Appeals in 156 Mich App 238 ; 401 NW2d 620 (1986) (Meadowlanes I). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Village of Kingsford v. Cudlip
green
1 sentence1986Village of Kingsford v Cudlip, 258 Mich 144 [ 241 NW 893 (1932)]; 37 Am Jur [Municipal Corporations, §§ 16, 23, 28, 29,] pp 633, 639, 645, 646 [56 Am Jur 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§41-43, 55, 57-62, 65, 68, 70]. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hetchler v. American Life Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1978The circuit court stated in its opinion: “There is nothing in the record * * * to indicate that the deceased was aware of the fact that his certificate obviously contained a typographical error.” A similar question arose in the case of Hetchler v. American Life Insurance Co. (1934), 266 Mich 608 , where the insurance company made a mistake in the computation of extended insurance. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.