7 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Murray v. Schillacegreen2 sentences2024See Murray v. Schillace, 658 A.2d 512, 514 (R.I. 1995) (concluding that a litigant received adequate notice, despite a typographical error, based on the fact that a failure to respond to that notice could result in the deprivation of property and the party could have overcome the defect with ordinary diligence). 2024See Murray v. Schillace, 658 A.2d 512, 514 (R.I. 1995) (concluding that a litigant received adequate notice, despite a typographical error, based on the fact that a failure to respond to that notice could result in the deprivation of property and the party could have overcome the defect with ordinary diligence). | 2 | 2 |
Kenneth L. Whitaker and Linda C. Whitaker v. Associated Credit Services, Inc., Trans Union Corporationgreen2 sentences2011Id. 2011See Whitaker , 946 F.2d at 1226 . | 1 | 1 |
Denomme v. Mowrygreen1 sentence2008See Denomme v. Mowry , 557 A.2d 1229 , 1231 (R.I. 1989) (stating that the Court must "resolve all doubts and ambiguities contained in the zoning laws in favor of the landowner because these regulations are in derogation of the property owner's common-law right to use her property as she wishes"). | 1 | 1 |
Burke v. Rhode Island Collegegreen1 sentence2006The date on the report for 1990 appears to be a typographical error and should probably read April 26, 1991. 4 "Whenever time is to be reckoned from any day, date, or act done, or the time of any act done, the day, date, or the day when the act is done shall not be included in the computation." G.L. 1956 § 43-3-13 ; see Burke v. Rhode Island College, 671 A.2d 803 , 804 (R.I. 1996) (describing how to compute time for a three year statute of limitations). 5 The Court will assume arguendo that if Plaintiff's agents discover the facts underlying his cause of action, that constitutes discovery by t | 1 | 1 |
Fay v. Parkergreen1 sentence1984In Fay v. Parker, 53 N.H. 342, 382 (1873), exemplary damages were denounced as "a monstrous heresy * * * an unhealthy excrescence, deforming the symmetry of the body of the law.” | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Opella v. Opella
green
1 sentence2011Opella , 896 A.2d at 720 ; see Whitaker , 946 F.2d at 1226 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Warner v. Board of Review
green
1 sentence2007When a landowner's use is pursuant to a special use permit, it is not necessary to apply for a further special use permit where the expanded use "is of the same character as that granted in the prior exception but would not substantially intensify the use." Warner v. Board of Review of the City of Newport , 104 R.I. 207 , 211 , 243 A.2d 92 , 94 (1968). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Warner v. BD. OF REVIEW OF NEWPORT
green
1 sentence2007When a landowner's use is pursuant to a special use permit, it is not necessary to apply for a further special use permit where the expanded use "is of the same character as that granted in the prior exception but would not substantially intensify the use." Warner v. Board of Review of the City of Newport , 104 R.I. 207 , 211 , 243 A.2d 92 , 94 (1968). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.