Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Todd v. Bear Valley Village Apartmentsgreen1 sentence2018Apartments, 980 P.2d 973, 979 (Colo. 1999). ¶ 89 Here, given the late addition of the LSI claim, and the parameters of the claim set forth in the plaintiffs’ written notice, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exclude Exhibit 1093 as a sanction for defendants’ failure to supplement their mandatory disclosures at a late point in litigation. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Yodergreen1 sentence2017See, e.g., People v. Yoder, 2016 COA 50, ¶ 10 (finding waiver where counsel objected to certain protective order provisions, but stated that he had no objection to others); Rail, ¶¶ 36-37 (finding instructional error claim waived by “affirmative conduct”); Rediger, ¶¶ 59-61. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rickstrewgreen2 sentences2011There, the division held that "when a criminal defendant dies during the pendency of an appeal directed only at a sentence entered after a guilty plea, abatement of the underlying conviction is not warranted." Id. at 1141 . 2011A division of this court further refined the parameters of the doctrine of abatement ab initio in People v. Rickstrew, 961 P.2d 1139, 1140-41 (Colo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
City of Colorado Springs v. Whitegreen1 sentence2010That common law privilege covers materials that are "predecisional" and "deliberative" if " 'disclosure would be harmful to the public interest.' " City of Colorado Springs v. White, 967 P.2d 1042, 1049-51 (Colo. 1998) (discussing the parameters of the privilege) (quoting in part Martinelli v. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
Alden v. Mainegreen2 sentences2002See Alden, 527 U.S. at 758 , 119 S.Ct. 2240 ; Fritz v. Regents of the Univ. of Colo., 196 Colo. 335, 339 , 586 P.2d 23, 26 (1978). 2002See Alden, 527 U.S. at 758 , 119 S.Ct. 2240 ; Fritz v. Regents of the Univ. of Colo., 196 Colo. 335, 339 , 586 P.2d 23, 26 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
Fritz v. Regents of the University of Coloradogreen2 sentences2002See Alden, 527 U.S. at 758 , 119 S.Ct. 2240 ; Fritz v. Regents of the Univ. of Colo., 196 Colo. 335, 339 , 586 P.2d 23, 26 (1978). 2002See Alden, 527 U.S. at 758 , 119 S.Ct. 2240 ; Fritz v. Regents of the Univ. of Colo., 196 Colo. 335, 339 , 586 P.2d 23, 26 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rail
green
1 sentence2017Although divisions of this court have recently clarified the parameters of waiver, see People v. Rail, 2016 COA 24, ¶¶ 27-41 ; Rediger, ¶¶ 51-60, the precise contours of the waiver doctrine in Colorado are not yet clearly settled.1 Each division of this court that has analyzed the waiver issue, however, has held that waiver requires some “affirmative conduct,” albeit to varying degrees. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.
green
2 sentences2010Court, 199 Colo. 163, 169 , 612 P.2d 1083 , 1088 (1980)); see also § 24-72-204(3)(a) (XIII) (materials must be "so candid or personal that public disclosure is likely to stifle honest and frank discussion within the government"). 5 . 2010Court, 199 Colo. 163, 169 , 612 P.2d 1083 , 1088 (1980)); see also § 24-72-204(3)(a) (XIII) (materials must be "so candid or personal that public disclosure is likely to stifle honest and frank discussion within the government"). 5 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Upjohn Co. v. United States
green
1 sentence2002Id. at 395-96, 101 S.Ct. 677 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
People v. Marez
green
1 sentence1999The court of appeals first addressed the application of the independent source exception to out-of-court identifications in People v. Marez, 916 P.2d 543 (Colo.App.1995). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Uhlrig v. Harder
green
2 sentences1997The court did not precisely define the type of conduct that shocks the conscience, but stated that the parameters of the requirement "must necessarily evolve over time from judgments as to the constitutionality of specific government conduct." Id. 1997The court did not precisely define the type of conduct that shocks the conscience, but stated that the parameters of the requirement “must necessarily evolve over time from judgments as to the constitutionality of specific government conduct.” Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.