Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2021 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marksbury v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Marksbury v. State, 322 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Iowa 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Jensen v. Sorensongreen2 sentences1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . 1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. George Charles Reicherter, George C. Reicherter
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 40–42, 108 S. Ct. at 1629– 30 (citing cases). 2021Id. at 40–42, 108 S. Ct. at 1629– 30 (citing cases). | 3 | 2021–2021 |
California v. Greenwood
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 40–42, 108 S. Ct. at 1629– 30 (citing cases). 2021Id. at 40–42, 108 S. Ct. at 1629– 30 (citing cases). | 3 | 2021–2021 |
Seibert v. Seibert
green
2 sentences1967In a statement made a part of the record at the time of the hearing on the motion for new trial the court stated “* * * [I] *517 can find no testimony of abandonment but only the testimony that the child and its whereabouts was secreted everytime he tried to determine where the child was.” We believe, like the trial court in In re Adoption of Alley, supra, 234 Iowa, at 936 , 14 N.W.2d, at 745 , the court’s announcement “* * * is contrary to the language of [Rubendall v. Bisterfelt, 227 Iowa 1388 , 291 N.W. 401 ], wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the 1944The trial court’s conclusion is contrary to the language of the Ruben-dall opinion, wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the requirement of consent to the adoption by both parents in addition to those mentioned in the statute, where there has been “conduct which amounts to an abandonment or to a waiver or forfeiture of custodial and other parental rights.” See, also, Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561, 567 , 153 N. W. 160 . | 3 | 1940–1967 |
In Re Adoption of Alley
green
2 sentences1967In a statement made a part of the record at the time of the hearing on the motion for new trial the court stated “* * * [I] *517 can find no testimony of abandonment but only the testimony that the child and its whereabouts was secreted everytime he tried to determine where the child was.” We believe, like the trial court in In re Adoption of Alley, supra, 234 Iowa, at 936 , 14 N.W.2d, at 745 , the court’s announcement “* * * is contrary to the language of [Rubendall v. Bisterfelt, 227 Iowa 1388 , 291 N.W. 401 ], wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the 1967In a statement made a part of the record at the time of the hearing on the motion for new trial the court stated “* * * [I] *517 can find no testimony of abandonment but only the testimony that the child and its whereabouts was secreted everytime he tried to determine where the child was.” We believe, like the trial court in In re Adoption of Alley, supra, 234 Iowa, at 936 , 14 N.W.2d, at 745 , the court’s announcement “* * * is contrary to the language of [Rubendall v. Bisterfelt, 227 Iowa 1388 , 291 N.W. 401 ], wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Rubendall v. Bisterfelt
neutral
2 sentences1967In a statement made a part of the record at the time of the hearing on the motion for new trial the court stated “* * * [I] *517 can find no testimony of abandonment but only the testimony that the child and its whereabouts was secreted everytime he tried to determine where the child was.” We believe, like the trial court in In re Adoption of Alley, supra, 234 Iowa, at 936 , 14 N.W.2d, at 745 , the court’s announcement “* * * is contrary to the language of [Rubendall v. Bisterfelt, 227 Iowa 1388 , 291 N.W. 401 ], wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the 1967In a statement made a part of the record at the time of the hearing on the motion for new trial the court stated “* * * [I] *517 can find no testimony of abandonment but only the testimony that the child and its whereabouts was secreted everytime he tried to determine where the child was.” We believe, like the trial court in In re Adoption of Alley, supra, 234 Iowa, at 936 , 14 N.W.2d, at 745 , the court’s announcement “* * * is contrary to the language of [Rubendall v. Bisterfelt, 227 Iowa 1388 , 291 N.W. 401 ], wherein we point out that some of our decisions have recognized exceptions to the | 1 | 1967–1967 |
In Re Adoption of Cannon
green
2 sentences1967In re Adoption of Cannon, 243 Iowa 828, 832 , 53 N.W.2d 877, 880 . 1967In re Adoption of Cannon, 243 Iowa 828, 832 , 53 N.W.2d 877, 880 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
In Re Guardianship of McFarland
green
2 sentences1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . 1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Pitzenberger v. Schnack
green
2 sentences1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . 1940See Jensen v. Sorenson, 211 Iowa 354 , 233 N. W. 717 ; Seibert v. Seibert, 170 Iowa 561 , 153 N. W. 160 ; In re McFarland’s Guardianship, 214 Iowa 417 , 239 N. W. 702 ; Pitzenberger v. Schnack, 215 Iowa 466 , 245 N. W. 713 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.